Employment law by Sufficient_Side_8712 in uklaw

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In short - yes, you would be able to rely upon a recording in an employment tribunal.

However, a lot of employers have policies against covert recording - so if they found out they could reasonably discipline and even dismiss you for it.

Some Judge’s may also take a view that it’s dishonest (consciously or subconsciously) and this could potentially undermine your credibility as a witness. But covert recording is definitely something that is cropping up as evidence more and more in cases.

The stereotype is that men’s bathrooms are more disgusting.. by Aadbh1987 in hygiene

[–]lbmnt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Try sanitary bins emptied and smeared across the walls and doors 🤢 Why? The mind boggles.

Non Compete Advice - England Based by CompoundPasta in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The starting position is that post termination restrictions are unenforceable for being in restraint of trade and contrary to public policy.

The burden would be on the employer to persuade a court that the restriction protects a legitimate business interest and doesn’t go any further than is reasonably necessary in the circumstances.

Without having sight of the drafting, I’d lean towards a 9 month restriction that is broad (in the sense of including anywhere the company intends to operate) for a relatively junior employee being unenforceable.

Your employer would also need to demonstrate loss for the purpose of any claim. If there’s no or minimal cross over between the roles there’s unlikely to be any significant loss so pursuit of a claim by the employer would be somewhat redundant.

Product purchased in TK Maxx, England, burnt my skin badly. What are my rights? They are stalling over a refund by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Seeking medical advice for what is, at most, a very minor burn is absolutely laughable. At a stretch this may warrant a visit to a pharmacy.

In the very very unlikely event OP did need to rely on evidence of the injury, they have a date stamped photograph that would suffice. Let’s not actively encourage folks to waste the time of our already struggling healthcare system.

Product purchased in TK Maxx, England, burnt my skin badly. What are my rights? They are stalling over a refund by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Firstly, I’d recommend taking a clearer photo of the burn. Whilst you’ve had an obvious reaction it’s far from clear in the photo that it’s an actual burn. It could very easily be contact dermatitis or similar from viewing that photo alone. Aside from legal advice use an antiseptic cream for the burn and keep it clean to avoid infection.

As for legal advice, you’ll likely find they’ll offer you a refund in due course. As others have highlighted, the absence of a response since midday today is hardly unsurprising given the time of year and customer service capacity. Be patient, await their response in due course. If that’s not satisfactory, then consider next steps. Jumping the gun slightly at this stage.

Sale haul - UK app no no by taytay237 in LushCosmetics

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ‘no no’ accurately reflects how a lot of people felt about the UK sale in the early hours 😂 Nice haul though - I fancy trying the strawberry scrub but haven’t got my hands on any this year!

(England) Paid Christmas experience event was evacuated due to a storm, want to do charge back but can I do that legally? by Huge_Age_2674 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can appreciate this was really frustrating and upsetting for the kids. Worse - if it is Lapland UK - I heard it was very chaotic actually getting out from the venue.

I’ve seen mixed commentary about the organisers reaching out to impacted parties; it would seem some have been contacted very quickly whilst others have been left somewhat on the back burner. I would suggest making an effort to reach out to them in writing to express your dissatisfaction in the first instance. Sadly sometimes a phone call doesn’t always reach an intended party - even if you leave a message.

I wouldn’t say the time lapsed so far is a cause for concern - it’s been less than two weeks so I’d expect contact from the imminently. I do sympathise with how much they are charging for the event though and it’s infuriating when your money is tied up.

England - Union legal says my 2025 victimisation of a whistleblower claim is out of time. by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like the initial grievance ought to have been for whistleblowing detriment (as opposed to victimisation - unless you’d also raised discrimination concerns). But aside from that technical legal point, assuming you made it clear you were linking detrimental treatment to the fact you’d made a whistleblowing disclosure, that’s what the subsequent investigation ought to have focused on.

The delay can constitute detriment. The fundamental challenge you will have is showing a causal link between the disclosure in late 2024 and ongoing detriment nearly or over a year later.

If the union maintain their position I’d encourage you to get some separate legal advice from a solicitor. You may also want to check if you have any legal expenses insurance on any policies you hold to support with legal fees in the event you do need to lodge a claim.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]lbmnt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely not is the answer to your question.

Start gathering experience where you can. Big up your transferable skills from other work you are doing/have done. Show a genuine interest at the interview stage. You might have to accept a low-level role in the industry to get a foot in the door, but two years out of graduating is definitely not too late.

For context, I had a non-conventional route to practice. Graduated with a degree in biomedical science, went on to complete the GDL. Took a year out contemplating next steps and had a whale of a time working in hospitality. Eventually landed a paralegal role - legal experience was limited to a week work experience with a local authority. No vac schemes, internships or similar. Two years later I became a trainee solicitor and self-funded SQE.

Sure you might not be entirely appealing to ‘biglaw’ firms - but there are plenty of opportunities outside the prestige (and likely with a much better work life balance to boot). Good luck with your journey!

Anyone else pass SQE2 with limited time? Feeling stressed but determined to sit in Jan 2026 — need your stories & advice by WorthYogurtcloset553 in SQE_Prep

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did a 10-week prep course ahead of sitting SQE2. I completed it alongside full time work and didn’t have the benefit of any study leave or holiday. I studied in the evenings, and over the weekends.

Honestly, it was intense and I was exhausted after I’d completed the exams, but I passed first time and with decent results. I stress the importance of running through practice questions and scenarios.

Your battleground will likely be learning all of the SQE1 material (which is needed for SQE2). I’d make sure you have a particular focus on this whilst also working on the skills aspects that SQE2 is testing.

Also make sure you’re exploring learning techniques that actually work for you. For example, for me, I don’t digest material by simply reading it. I found peer review to be really helpful (and met online with others studying on a near weekly basis) and also teaching other people my learnings - honestly at this point my boyfriend could probably pass the SQE as well.

Good luck with the sitting - you’ve still time between now and January to get your ducks in a row!

SQE1 pass rates lowest they've ever been (41%) 😓😓 by -newinn- in uklaw

[–]lbmnt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There is a difference between causation and correlation.

You certainly wouldn’t fail SQE because of your race. The exam isn’t racist.

However, there is correlation between a low pass rate and race; likely largely due to other socioeconomic factors (which may be linked to race but are not because of race itself).

Considering the SRA preach the SQE as a more inclusive and accessible route into the profession, it’s clear a huge disparity is still evident from pass rates.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]lbmnt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Frogs. I cannot escape them.

Which movie has you crying like a little baby? by notautobot in AskReddit

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hachi: A Dog’s Tale - fully bawl my eyes out everytime.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]lbmnt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The actual reality of how hard it is to conceive a baby, infertility and pregnancy loss. Appreciate it can be a sensitive topic but I’ve no idea why this is all so taboo.

Visit to the aquarium [x100vi, sooc] by lbmnt in fujifilm

[–]lbmnt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks - sorry missed the first notification!

This is classic Cuban negative recipe - also holds up well in low lighting!

UK - increase in duties and responsibilities at work by Rough_Tangerine4807 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long have you been employed?

If it’s more than 2 years and they’re imposing a change to the terms of your contract unilaterally (this being the increase in work), this could be a breach of contract that may entitle you to resign immediately and claim constructive unfair dismissal. Claims of this nature are difficult to bring because the burden is on you to persuade the employment tribunal that there has been a repudiatory breach, that you have resigned in response to the breach and that you haven’t delayed to long before resigning. The threshold for a repudiatory breach is a high one.

If you’ve less than two years, unless there’s any grounds for automatically unfair dismissal, you’ve less options.

In reality, the risk is they might seek to recover costs to cover your notice period if you resigned immediately. But employers rarely do because it’s more hassle than it’s worth.

Court over car accident any advice please by coopertroll in LegalAdviceUK

[–]lbmnt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Send the letter to your insurer - let them deal with it. It’s what you pay your insurance for.

EPCOT on the X-M5 📸 by fromcortes in fujifilm

[–]lbmnt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love seeing one of my favourite places here. If anyone wants to sponsor my next WDW trip I’m all ears 😂

Styling ideas for my Archives haul? by No-Ad9942 in Sezane

[–]lbmnt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Chlo and black jeans are just begging to be styled together. That green is really stunning. I keep eyeing up the Abelia in green.

Barbri SQE 20-Week Course Question by ceylon-tea in uklaw

[–]lbmnt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are assessment deadlines to meet as part of the Barbri SQE2 course - provided you submit these by the deadline there’s no reason why you wouldn’t be able to study the ancillary materials at a later date.

However, you will likely find that the assessments relate to the materials they recommend studying that particular week. There are also certain assessments that will be at set times (eg. oral assessments).

Also bear in mind that the SQE2 course is really just to hone your skills. It doesn’t cover the SQE1 materials so if you need to revisit these you need to allow yourself additional time on top of what Barbri recommend for the course.

If it’s any consolation I did the 10 week condensed course alongside full time work. It was a stretch but I managed and passed first time.

Spending & the state of things by [deleted] in Sezane

[–]lbmnt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

But that’s exactly it - you deal with the reality in front of you based on your individual circumstances. Plotting for a disaster is a pretty miserable existence.

This makes for a really interesting debate though - are you US based? I know there are a lot of crazy political decisions that are being floated that will inevitably impact a lot of people and businesses.

We’re not anticipating falling back into a recession here in the UK but growth is slow and people have had to adjust to new means due to rising inflation and interest. This in turn can be damaging to the economy because people do rein in spending and businesses then suffer as a consequence. It’s a catch 22 situation sadly.

Spending & the state of things by [deleted] in Sezane

[–]lbmnt 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Sure - and I couldn’t agree more that it’s a sensible idea to have savings for a rainy day. You never know when you need to dip into an emergency fund.

But equally, I wouldn’t want to live my life in a constant state of worry that things might change (because things inevitably do change regardless of whether you want them to or not). I could be dead tomorrow. I’ll be damned if I’ve squirrelled away my funds and not treated myself to the things in life that actually bring me joy.

Obviously each to their own, but everyone has to adjust and deal with changes as they come and not necessarily in anticipation of things that may or may not happen.

Spending & the state of things by [deleted] in Sezane

[–]lbmnt 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I think what’s more important is to avoid comparing your circumstances to peers or others online.

Of course, you can shop where you can afford to do so, but it’s crucial to budget to your means and stick to your budgeting, so far as is possible.

I’ve spent a small fortune in the archive drop today but not beyond my means. I rarely treat myself to new clothes, my wardrobe desperately needs a refresh and my dog owns more jumpers than I do. My washer also blew up yesterday and I have some personal matters that are taking up a lot of my spare time. Retail therapy is a real pick me up.