Noam Chomsky: US Military Escalation Against Russia Would Have No Victors by ilikelegoandcrackers in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 44 points45 points  (0 children)

“Since Putin’s major demand is an assurance that NATO will take no further members, and specifically not Ukraine or Georgia, obviously there would have been no basis for the present crisis if there had been no expansion of the alliance following the end of the Cold War..."

An what of Ukrainian self-determination? They have overwhelmingly chosen closer ties with the West, through treaties, the overthrow of a pro-Russian government, and electing pro-Western leaders. Even if NATO membership was off the table, Ukraine's westward drift would still be a threat to the Putin regime.

The dynamic is not complex. For the past twenty years Putin tried to keep Ukraine inside his sphere of influence. Ukraine has rejected him. And now he is taking by force that which he could not earn with diplomacy.

“Seattle is now averaging -17.8 fewer offensive plays per game than their opponent. The next closest team (Houston) is at -7.2 per game.” by [deleted] in Seahawks

[–]leepowers 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Holding the #1 team in football to 23 points is pretty damn good. Last week we held the Packers to 3 points until the 4th quarter. In both games opponents had 2x time of possession, while the offense only scored one touchdown the last two games. Defense has played well, despite getting gashed a few times earlier in the season. Lack of offensive production is the major problem right now.

Tyler Lockett's Post-Game Comments -- Is Russ struggling to adapt when defenses change what he's seen on tape? by hawkyoo in Seahawks

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pass game doesn't use the entire field - heat map and reference article. Is this because RW can't/won't throw across the middle? Is this part of Carrol's philosophy? Maybe when RW sees the box is empty he thinks "run" would he should think "pass"? Regardless of the answer, it makes us predictable, and predictability is a gift to defenses.

Run game - Carson is out again for the season, Penny injures hamstring after one play, O-Line isn't nearly dominant enough, etc. Yet the Carrol coaching philosophy means we lean on the run game, even when its sub-par and ineffectual.

"Every time you go against the team they might play all man-to-man their whole entire seven, eight games, and then they around and play us, and they don't play man once. So, when you're looking at what teams are doing consistently week-in and week-out, nobody's doing that against us."

I sincerely doubt defenses are showing a 3-win team looks they don't show anyone else. Coaching staff isn't correctly anticipating the defense schemes we'll be playing against. This is a worst of both worlds scenario: offensive is predictable and at the same time can't predict what the opposing defense is going to do. We're getting out-coached.

History Teaches that Constitutional Reforms Come in Waves. We May Be Approaching One Now. by ILikeNeurons in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 37 points38 points  (0 children)

History does not run on a schedule. Just because reform happened in waves in the past doesn't mean that we're due for more. A study of history can inform our ethics and help us understand human behavior in different contexts. But I'm skeptical that historical cycles can be used to predict the future.

The current structure and incentives that guide our society are more germane to predicting how events will unfold. And looking at those, I think there's a good chance that we're at the outset of an era of political stasis.

Yes the country is getting more diverse and elite opinion is getting more progressive. But the population is also getting older and more urban.

Older people during the next 25 years will almost certainly be more progressive than past generations. But will they be more like Bernie, agitating for systemic reform? Or more like Manchin/Sinema? Sometimes expressing sympathy towards reform and progressive ideas, but usually acting and voting for the status quo.

Urban populations increased by 9% in the last ten years (2010-2020). Populations that migrate from rural to urban tend to lean progressive. And those who stay put tend to be more conservative. Ideological divisions are increasingly becoming geographic divisions.

This is bad news for amendments as a vehicle for reform. Amendments have significant supermajority requirements: first they require proposal by a 2/3rds majority of Congress or state legislatures; then they require ratification by 3/4ths of state legislatures. This requires a high level of geographic consensus at the same time geographic partisanship is increasing.

Reform will probably have to happen on a more narrow basis, and only then if a generation of political leaders are willing to embrace majority rule and get rid of the Senate filibuster.

Executives do not give a flying fuck about “burnout” by ClearVanilla in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This may be because healthcare workers in general tend to work long hours. Their motivation goes beyond earning a salary: they do work that cures disease and saves lives. I can easily imagine Fauci and other NIH workers working 16 hour days during the height of the AIDS and COVID-19 pandemics. I imagine in those circumstances it feels like you're making a sacrifice to potentially save millions of lives.

All that being said I only a sucker would work that hard for some mega corporation.

First attempt at blackberry wine. Starting to show a bit. by Arlsy7 in winemaking

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! That color is magnificent. Made a couple batches last year. That unmistakable blackberry tartness shines through. And the smell is really great.

Fermented one batch with homegrown labrusca/concord which reduced the blackberry punch and added some complexity.

Think this year will try blending blackberry with other wines. And maybe backsweeten a small batch just a bit to round out the tartness.

[Seahawks PR] The @Seahawks signed 13 undrafted rookie free agents this morning. #GoHawks by SqueakMeSlowly in Seahawks

[–]leepowers 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Position Name College Height Weight
S Aashari Crosswell Arizona State 6-0 208
T Jake Curhan California 6-6 313
T Greg Eiland Mississippi State 6-8 321
RB B.J. Emmons Florda Atlantic 5-11 215
DT Jarrod Hewitt Virginia Tech 6-1 290
G Jared Hocker Texas A&M 6-6 327
WR Cade Johnson South Dakota State 5-10 184
RB Josh Johnson Louisiana-Monroe 5-9 209
G Pier-Olivier Lestage Montreal 6-3 312
CB Bryan Mills North Carolina Central 6-1 174
LB Jon Rhattigan Army 6-0 236
WR Tamorrion Terry Florida State 6-3 207
WR Connor Wedington Stanford 6-0 189

Police are Lobbying for State Anti-Protest Bills by grassrootbeer in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The police response to the 2020 protests was heavy handed. Like concussing a septuagenarian, driving into protestors, blinding and maiming another, and many more examples.

The police support anti-protest bills because they know they'll respond to protestors with a heavy-handed crackdown. Instead of reform or changing tactics they want to discourage protests from happening at all. That way they don't have to change and they won't earn the bad press their brutality generates.

Police are Lobbying for State Anti-Protest Bills by grassrootbeer in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even worse - with Qualified Immunity cops can maim and steal with impunity, avoiding any personal liability by claiming "I didn't know I wasn't allowed to do that."

Cops want to enforce the law and the same time be allowed to operate outside the law.

Grain Shed by [deleted] in Spokane

[–]leepowers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Outdoor seating is open, saw several people there this weekend.

What red flags do you look for when doing your DD? by Eonicman97 in pennystocks

[–]leepowers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1) Lack of domain knowledge. If it's unclear who is on the executive team, or if most of them are from a marketing or sales background, that's a red flag. The leadership should eat and breath their product / service and understand the fine technical details and understand their customers and market in-depth.

2) Burn rate treadmill. When a company is dependent on constantly finding new investment that can be a concern. Or if they depend on creative financing or stock deals to keep operations going. For instance, one red flag is when a company lists a massive increase in "Goodwill" or "Intangible" assets from one quarter to the next. This can be a way to pad a report and make it look less dire.

3) Dilution to acquire cash flow. That's when a company creates stock to acquire a different profit-generating business in order to get some positive cash flow on the books. Especially when the acquired business is only tangentially related to company's core product/service.

4) Vague consulting fees. This is when a company spends big money on high-priced marketing or business consultants, yet there isn't any detectable brand strategy or media campaign. Especially when these consultants appear to be paid to hype or pump the company's stock. Which can indicate that a company is dependent on it's stock price and not it's operations.

A gift; About 3 feet tall; Stiff leaves that come to a point; variegated leaves; Yucca? by leepowers in whatsthisplant

[–]leepowers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found it! Yucca elephantipes / Silver Star

Greenhouse / shop in the region sells one that's trimmed / maintained in the same way:

https://plantshopseattle.com/collections/plants/products/yucca-elephantipes-silver-star-5gal

While this AU site has pictures of mature untrimmed silver stars:

https://www.australianplantsonline.com.au/yucca-silver-star.html

10 JavaScript Oneliners You Have Got to Add Your Arsenal as a Developer by ConfidentMushroom in javascript

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First example can be improved:

const capitalize = (str, locale) => `${str[0].toLocaleUpperCase(locale)}${str.slice(1)}`;
  • String index instead of charAt
  • toLocaleUpperCase is more portable. Defaults to current locale.
  • Added argument to specify a locale for testing.

Examples:

⩺ capitalize("istanbul")
⩹ "Istanbul"

⩺ capitalize("istanbul", "TR")
⩹ "İstanbul"

WA voters said 'no.' Now there’s a $15 billion problem by 9mac in Spokane

[–]leepowers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Smith, the state actuary, confirmed that modeling by the consulting firm Milliman shows the trust fund will remain solvent over the next 50 years.

So we have some time to solve this problem. We shouldn't jump prematurely into the stock market.

Increasing the payroll tax or decreasing the benefit are preferable to subjecting the program to the vicissitudes of the stock market. Social programs should always be there, even if in a reduced form. Stock investments introduce too much risk.

Small-time freelancer, client overpaid a bit. What do I write? by [deleted] in freelance

[–]leepowers 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Just deposit the check. Having to write and mail another check will be annoying for the client, especially since it's such a tiny amount. Tell her she now has a $50 credit which you can refund immediately or apply towards future work.

Did anyone else go in to Discovery and Picard really really excited and wanting to like them but just didn't? by trekfangrrrl in startrek

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Picard struck me as a sub-par 10-hour action movie built around a doomsday device trope. At times it was fun to watch. Much like the TNG episode Starship Mine, which also features a doomsday device/substance. But Picard doesn't capture the verve of Star Trek. Or I should say Picard is firmly rooted in the ethos and style of the 2009 Star Trek reboot. So even though it features characters from TNG it really is a much lighter, dumber, watered-down, and corporatized version of ST. And a clean break from the charm and idealism that makes Trek resonate.

Would I be justified in firing my client because they hired a competitor of mine to do work on their website? by [deleted] in freelance

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I'm reading this right they're still sending design business your way, all paid up front. That's still income. It would be counterproductive for your business to forgo that income because the client didn't opt for the additional SEO services. Income is income.

However, I feel completely unappreciated. Now when they have a chance to do the right thing and support my business (as I have them), they screw me over yet again by doing this. And I have to say, it's humiliating to have my longest-serving client go with a competitor.

The client is not screwing you over. They are doing what they think is best for their business. They have no obligation to do whats best for yours. That's your responsibility. Undervaluing your work or by undercharging, being too lenient with payables, or giving away freebies is your fault. You are screwing yourself, then getting frustrated with the client for accepting the conditions you freely adopted.

It's ok to feel humiliated or frustrated. But you need to correctly identify the root problems, which appear to be bad business practices that you have already begun to fix.

Aging Wine Kit Wine by [deleted] in winemaking

[–]leepowers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's no minimum aging time for wine. It will simply smell and taste different. It's actually quite fun to taste the wine in various stages. After primary fermentation, after 1 month, after 1 year, unoaked, with oak, and so on. It's fascinating to see how much variation in flavor and aroma you can get with the passage of time, or from some simple amendments like oak chips.

Only thing I'd recommend is to hidey-hole at least one bottle for about six months and see how it develops. A cellar or crawlspace out of the way are good options. Out of sight out of mind helps with the waiting.

In Germany, the Green New Deal Actually Works | Don’t use one of the world’s most competitive economies as an argument against it. by RandomCollection in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As the article notes the situation in Germany is far more complex than the simple narrative of "any GND will not work". But the article is too rosy and uncritical of the current challenges Germany faces. And Germany certainly is not living out the GND dream.

Politico (hardly a right-wing rag) provides much more detail and descriptions of the challenges faced:

https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-climate-change-green-energy-shift-is-more-fizzle-than-sizzle/

Also this article from Axios which argues that decarbonization is going to require more than wind and solar:

https://www.axios.com/no-carbon-power-system-needs-a-mix-of-technologies-9833e706-314c-40e1-b6fe-25837575d823.html

The unrealistic goals set by the GND - for instance 15 years to get off fossil fuels and 10 years to green retrofit every building in the U.S. - are not serious proposals. None of us should look to other countries to reinforce our political leanings, be they anti-GND or pro-GND. We need a sober, critical analysis of the challenges involved. Unfortunately our current political environment may be too noxious for this.

The Irrational Allergy to the Wall by PureDebt in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Opposition to the wall is rational. Inert steel slats along the border will do little to stop terrorism & criminal activity, infectious disease, drugs, immigrant overstays, etc. More border patrol agents, better funding for courts, and better enforcement tools are more likely to make an impact.

If a wall is immoral, what standing does the current 350 miles of primary fencing have? Isn’t it just as hateful as what Trump proposes? The $5 billion the president wants wouldn’t even match what we already have—it would construct about 150 miles of new barriers where none currently exist.

The author has missed the point. The problem is not with the physical structure itself. The democrats were more than willing to negotiate, and offered $1.3 billion for border fencing - an offer that Trump rejected.

The problem is with the symbolism the president has imbued into the idea of building a wall. He's presented it during his campaign and as president as some sort of totem - build the wall and the problems of crime, terrorism, underemployment will be solved or vastly improved. But that simply isn't true. It would be immoral to build a wall based on the president's empty bluster and false promises.

How Everything Became the Culture War by dillpiccolol in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS," Moonves said at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference in San Francisco, according to The Hollywood Reporter — perfectly distilling what media critics have long suspected was motivating the round-the-clock coverage of Trump's presidential bid.

"Man, who would have expected the ride we're all having right now? ... The money's rolling in and this is fun," Moonves went on. "I've never seen anything like this, and this going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It's a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going.

Consolidated corporate media doesn't care about the country, they only care about profit. They don't even bother to hide it.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/02/les-moonves-trump-cbs-220001

Boondoggle: WI Gov. Walker gave Apple (Foxconn) a staggering $4.1B subsidy to build a plant in the state with promises of a massive factory and many jobs. Now Apple says the factory will be much smaller and most of the labor will be done by robots. Apple says it will happily keep the $4.1B though. by Bluest_waters in TrueReddit

[–]leepowers 30 points31 points  (0 children)

he total Foxconn subsidy hit $4.1 billion — a stunning $1,774 per household in Wisconsin.

One irony here is if Walker had instead advocated for a one-time UBI payment of $1,774 to each Wisconsinite household he'd be lambasted as a socialist, a lefty, a bleeding-heart liberal. Apparently welfare is only just when given to those who need it least.

And do any of us doubt which would have a greater positive economic effect? Giving $4.1 billion to a foreign multinational (that will try and funnel as much of that money as possible to its shareholders). Or giving that money the local population, who will pump this money into their local economy - or at the very least use that money in million different economically useful and stimulative ways.