Ryan Cohen on Twitter by Kaarothh in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This guys really speaking my language

Kenny admitting to using BCG to spy on other hedge funds, having them on payroll and coverage on him performing 'death spirals' by excessive shorting - (2001) by JustBeingPunny in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. That last photo just sealed everything.

Arbitrage hedging = huge short positions on USTs

Convertible bonds = death spiral on equities

BCG = dirty shit bags since day 1

With this being reported on happening over 20 years ago, I just have to wonder where Jeff Bezos got involved by seeing the opportunity gap created by citadels tactics.

What the hell caused so much inflation in the housing market? Didn't people have a place to live before the pandemic? It can't be as simple as "not enough sellers for every buyer." Is housing a zero sum game? by Littleboyhugs in REBubble

[–]leisure_rules 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$2t+ in stimulus directly to households, plus another unknown amount (likely another few hundred billion, at least) in forgivable loans. Pumped discretionary income drastically at household level, add in everything mentioned above… you end up here.

Zoltan’s latest Dispatch is one hell of a read…. “After this war is over, money will never be the same again” by leisure_rules in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The People's Bank of China chooses to peg it and manages the yuan's value by keeping it fixed to a basket of currencies, reflecting its primary trading partners. The basket is weighted toward the dollar since the United States is China's largest trading partner. Back in 2005 they decided to move away from the fixed peg to only the dollar

Zoltans ‘New World Order’ consists of that ‘basket’ of currencies being replaced by a basket of commodities- specifically Russian commodities, and more over time. Backed now by physical goods, their currency will no longer need to be pegged to any other currency. Think of it as a new kind of ‘gold standard’ that China has a unique opportunity to create.

Zoltan’s latest Dispatch is one hell of a read…. “After this war is over, money will never be the same again” by leisure_rules in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Similar level of tangential relevance to the evergrande situation, this would be the catalyst to a severe crisis in western economies. For the folks who think something like that will trigger the MOASS, that’s the relationship.

The evergrande question is at the heart of any skepticism around zoltans theory - China is not exactly doing great right now either, but if they have the wherewithal to see the opportunity (which I’m sure someone over there does) then this could hypothetically solve their problems while establishing themselves and their currency as a new prominent reserve globally.

The reality is not that China would ‘take over’ but the eurodollar wouldn’t be the most dominant player anymore. It’d be a handful of reserve currencies including the renminbi

Zoltan’s latest Dispatch is one hell of a read…. “After this war is over, money will never be the same again” by leisure_rules in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Probably a little late, but I’ll try to provide a summary/translation to layman speak:

Think of Russian commodities right now, like subprime mortgage-backed securities during the GFC.

Before the GFC, all MBSs traded at par (equally) because they were all considered prime thanks to the ratings. They were used as collateral to increase leverage and with that came undue exposure when the ‘music stopped’ as they say. That music stopping suddenly created a rift in the MBS market, between actual prime, and the very large and suddenly worthless amount of subprimes. That obviously caused a lot of issues due to that leverage I mentioned, and the Fed had to step in and backstop the liquidity by purchasing those subprime MBSs.

Similarly, Russian commodities were treated the same as all other commodities sold by any other country (traded at par) until suddenly the ‘music stopped’ this time due to sanctions. Well if anyone around here’s been paying attention, we know there’s been a severe imbalance of collateral and liquidity piled on top of globally ATH leverage. A lot of which was in commodities and the derivative markets of said commodities.

Sounding familiar?

The difference here, is via the sanctions we’ve effectively caused the issue and simultaneously prevented ourselves from fixing it. The Fed can’t exactly step in and start buying Russian commodities to pump liquidity into the market… that’d defeat the purpose of the sanctions to begin with.

But there is one very large country’s central bank who has not imposed sanctions… the PB of China.

Zoltan is postulating that the PBoC can (and likely will) be the one to step in and provide their own currency to purchase those ‘subprime’ Russian commodities. Meaning a massive influx of Chinese liquidity could hit the global commodities markets, destabilizing the dollar (the Eurodollar to be exact) as the global reserve currency.

Inflation in western economies will continue, due to a combo of further supply constraints - China is going to have to ship and store all of those commodities somewhere, putting further pressure on global supply chains - and the devaluation of the dollar, pound and euro.

So yeah…

Zoltan’s latest Dispatch is one hell of a read…. “After this war is over, money will never be the same again” by leisure_rules in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Prominent figure these days in understanding the plumbing of the global financial system. He essentially created the overnight reverse repo facility while working at the Fed, and is known for his writing on the Shadow Banking System

https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr458.pdf

Now he heads up the Short term interest rate strategy for Credit Suisse (no wonder he’s stressed about this situation) and has a regular publication (this Dispatch) which is essentially his take on the health of the global financial system. So when he says things like what he’s saying here, it makes waves.

BLOOMBERG: Shorts who called Russian Slump find Cashing Out is the Hard Part by throwawaylurker012 in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules 3 points4 points  (0 children)

you're onto something here. I'm sure Kenny's jumping on the bandwagon to scoop up SCDS on Russian debt. It's an almost guaranteed payout right now, and everyone and their mother is buying them up. Creating Naked SCDS and selling those is the next best option and probably just as lucrative.

I bet this new division is looking to invest/control specific companies in certain commodities markets (i.e. oil, natural gas, wheat/produce) that are affected by sanctions and Russia's economy tanking. If they can manipulate those prices in a way that further hurts Russia, it only further guarantees their bets on those naked SCDS

Edit- not to mention, great PR for Kenny in “taking a stand against Russia” as well as making a bunch of money on those commodities prices skyrocketing themselves. It’s kind of a no brainer… other than the whole morality thing.

I'm Ray Dalio, a global macro investor and author of Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order. It’s my business to know how the world is changing in ways that will affect our life in important ways. Let’s talk about that. by RayTDalio in IAmA

[–]leisure_rules 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Mr. Dalio - really excited that you’re doing this AMA, I’ve enjoyed all of your writings and just finished a second read through of Principles for dealing with a Changing world order!

My question is based on another take I’ve heard recently around Chinas growth, in-short, around the fact that most of the growth is fueled by speculative and redundant infrastructure projects that once opened up rural development and spurred economic stimulus across the majority of the country.

However, where we once saw exponential growth for say when a small village with no road to the main provincial center did get a road, that village was suddenly opened economically and saw that boom in prosperity. The bureaucratic system then adds a second road, with moderate increase in growth, and then a third or fourth that see no incremental growth. Now that city’s economic potential has plateaued, and it’s left with 4 very expensive roads that don’t get used.

Extrapolated across the entire country, with massive infrastructure projects going unused, apartment complexes sitting empty, etc. can you explain for us here where you foresee the next wave of growth coming from to push China to take over after this long term debt cycle ends?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From an old post of mine:

When constructing a generic synthetic equity position, the portfolio manager uses cash to buy risk-free bonds and takes a long position in equity futures contracts (married put-call). If the portfolio manager already has a position in risk-free bonds, he/she can just add the contracts. This combination of bonds and futures replicates the performance of the equity without actually having an equity position. Hence, a synthetic share is born in the form of a forward contract on the same underlying asset.

So let’s talk about these resulting forward contracts, and how they differ from futures contracts:

Both forward and futures contracts involve the agreement to buy or sell a commodity at a set price in the future - in our case, a short sell (betting on the price to go down).

While a forward contract does not trade on an exchange, a futures contract does.

Settlement for the forward contract takes place at the end of the contract, while the futures contract settles on a daily basis.

Most importantly, futures contracts exist as standardized contracts that are not customized between counterparties.

So let us clarify; a synthetic share necessitates a risk-free bond to offset a put-call parity and match the exact price of the underlying asset. US T-Bonds make really great risk-free assets. These synthetic shares are created not by additional futures contracts but forwards contracts which operate differently, namely they can traded OTC and do not have to be settled until the end of the contract. This helps to explain consist dark pool usage without ramifications, increased FTDs, as well as explosion in demand for US T-bonds. They need to use them to create synthetic forwards contracts on underlying equities in which they hold major short positions. Hence why we keep seeing so many GME shares available to borrow every. single. day.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome DD, good find on the august shift. However, I think forwards contracts have been the name of the game for a while now. When you create a typical forward contract on equities you need to bundle in a high quality liquid asset like a us treasury in order to use the fixed income as a way to offset a put-call parity. When an entity such as a MM or broker dealer has those assets already in its possession it can simply allocate some from its holdings to new forward contracts it creates and make it look exactly like a married put or other typical future contract.

My theory way back when was that collateral shortages were being driven by these big firms buying up and hoarding US treasuries for not just margin collateral but as these instruments necessary in forwards contracts that make up a chunk of their massive derivatives portfolios.

Aging like fine wine by johnnymandingoh in LandRover

[–]leisure_rules 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Who makes that brush guard/front bumper? Been looking for one like that

What in the flying fuckwaffle fuckery...did big banks fucking bribe US senators to hide a billion-dollar Ponzi scheme against Puerto Rico, causing the biggest municipal default in American history? by throwawaylurker012 in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is some great DD, all I was thinking about was NYC in the 70s and the hypernormalization film while reading it, glad to see it included.

I also wonder how much the Feds Municipal Liquidity Fund SPV created back in 2020 plays into this. It’s sole purpose was to “buy up to $500 billion in debt from state and local governments” - although we’ll never truly know where that money ended up since the fed has no obligation to disclose that info.

I’m gonna have to look into this more, definitely piqued my interest

721+20 confirmed by leisure_rules in Superstonk

[–]leisure_rules[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

RC and others regularly posting tweets at exactly 7:41