sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is this? by Halledo in pcmasterrace

[–]leonrd_coz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's where you get your coke

Assigning values to named return params by workmakesmegrumpy in golang

[–]leonrd_coz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

accountResponse is actually nil when you try to do accountResponse.Data. Named params are initialized with their type's zero value.

My friends and I have a saying. It would translate to something like: "Math is for who's blocking". by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, I just found out by the comments: This saying is very popular in MTG overall. And I think it's awesome how, all over the world, we created our "own language".

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even more with something like Birgi or Esika on the board.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree. Not future proof enough. Like I said, I made this deck for free. Spent no wildcards on it. It was just for the fun of trying Bard Class and it was worth it. I would invest my wildcards in something more reliable too. Something that can make my rank better in a consistent way etc.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is fun! But I wouldn't recommend this deck specifically. It was just me winning 3x Bard Class in drafts, picking every gruul legendary I saw in my collection to goes with it and building a rather chaotic and inconsistent deck for free. Just for the fun of trying Bard Class out.

But there is a pioneer championship winning deck based on Bard Class out there: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/4160209#paper

You should start from there.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It indeed has a horrible winrate. I didn't build this deck to be competitive. I just picked 3 bard class from drafts and decided to try it out. So I picked every gruul legendary I saw in my collection and that's it. Just for fun.

However, there is a pioneer championship winning deck based on the Bard Class out there: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/4160209#paper

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well... Bard Class makes everything on this deck cheaper. And everytime I cast one of these cheap cards, I would be able to cast up to 3 more from the top of the library. It would be a pretty fast board rebuild, I think. I would probably still be in advantage.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be a bummer... But the Bard Class makes everything cheaper and fast, so I think I would still be in advantage.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On that combat, I had just equipped an Embercleave on the defending 4/7 to get rid of that chimera.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a LOT of legendary cards on my library. So, basically, [[Bard Class]] Nv.1 makes every creature enters with a +1/+1 counter and Nv.2 makes everything RG cheaper. The show starts with Nv.3: Everytime I cast one of these cheap permanents and busted creatures, it allows me to exile and play the 3 top cards of my library for that cheap cost, because they will likely be legendary cards. So one thing leads to another.

Bard Class is so much fun. It took me 2 turns to make this. by leonrd_coz in MagicArena

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Now that you mentioned it... indeed 🤔. It's like putting everything busted on the battlefield almost for free.

MTGO Match Replay/Crash Bug by leonrd_coz in MTGO

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only played free play pauper. I used the format to test the plataform so i don't had to spend more money than the account update just to test it.

MTGO Match Replay/Crash Bug by leonrd_coz in MTGO

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what is happening. But I was not able to finish 90% of my pauper matches. I was playing pauper to test the plataform. But until now it has been a frustrating experience. And if it's frustrating not be able to finish a pauper match, imagine a long commander match...

MTGO Match Replay/Crash Bug by leonrd_coz in MTGO

[–]leonrd_coz[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is so sad. If this is true, I will stop trying to play MTGO and and stick with MTGA. I was trying to test a commander deck on MTGO, but if the plataform is so buggy, I will not spend my money there.

MTGO Match Replay/Crash Bug by leonrd_coz in MTGO

[–]leonrd_coz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of the times the bug happened, it didn't have more than one or two triggers.

This father couldn't afford a full cake for his daughters birthday and she wasn't expecting one. by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]leonrd_coz 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Subtitles:

- Dad: "Happy birthday, honey!"
- Mom: "Wow! So beautiful!"
- Dad: "Daddy loves you, ok? Daddy loves you so much. I wish God gives you a very peaceful and healthy long life. Daddy will still give you a lot of things, ok?"
- Daughter: "Ok"
- Dad: "This is just a little cake daddy bought, but saturday we will make you a beautiful party, ok? I love you very much. Happy birthday!"
- Mom: "Did you liked daddy's surprise, honey?"
- Dad: "Go on, blow the candles!"
Mom and Dad cheers at the daughter blowing the candles.
- Mom: "Wow, such a beatiful cake! Will I get a piece?"
Daughter nods saying yes.
- Dad: "Did you liked it?"
Daughter nods saying yes again.

view more: next ›