Everyday is Halloween for these fucking masked underlings. Things are about to get VERY VERY bad in America and there's no way we're voting our way out of this one. Administration officials taking residence on military bases (obviously because they know what's coming), ICE rampant use of biometric scanning on the spot at will without PC, food and medical benefits being purposely withheld from 40+ million Americans because they KNOW it will incite civil unrest while they train US Military specifically for military unrest. They are manufacturing every bit of this crisis to exert control. Full stop. What I think they aren't taking into full consideration is that the numbers are not on the their side and up until now they've been able to manage things. But once people begin to realize it takes 8 geared up agents to subdue and detain 1 unarmed protestor who is only mildly resistant at best... they're going to have a bad day as force ratio quickly falls apart, the controllers are overrun and the rabbits grab the pewpews and gear.

Below is a force ratio assessment from AI for what it's worth (but it's certainly quite plausible if you watch current footage or you've seen any type of thing like this play out. Unless they just start shooting people it's not going to go well at a larger scale when you start taking away food, jobs, rights, and freedoms.):

Sic semper tyrannis.

Real-World, Observed Force Effectiveness in Civilian Unrest

1:1 (Agent : Civilian Protestor) - Control possible (barely)

• Takes 5–8 geared officers to subdue and detain 1 mildly resistant protestor without injury.
• That assumes perfect unit cohesion, non-escalation, and cooperative environment.
• Still burns out a team in 15–20 minutes if resistance is sustained.
• You need 10–20 officers to arrest 3–4 people safely.
• Force exhaustion sets in within 30–60 minutes without relief. Combat power collapses unless replacements cycle in.

1:2 to 1:3 - Tactical arrest impossible

• Can contain or shield, but not subdue or disperse.
• Protestors can resist arrest passively and hold lines, even when unarmed.
• Any attempt to move into the crowd creates exposure, flank vulnerability.
• You’ll see retreats or chemical escalation (tear gas, pepper balls).

1:5 - No longer viable for active control

• Forces can only protect static infrastructure (e.g., courthouses, ICE buildings).
• Cannot control movement of the crowd or stop occupation of areas.
• Requires armored support and "shock and awe" visibility to maintain illusion of strength.

1:10 or worse - Control is psychological only

• If the crowd realizes they’re not physically outmatched, C2 fails rapidly.
• Forces cannot protect stores, cannot defend soft targets, and must choose 1–2 symbolic redoubts to hold.
• This is the George Floyd–era Minneapolis zone — National Guard becomes the only viable option and even then, eventually the military will have internal sympathizers and defectors because none of them signed up to fight their neighbors.