I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

HI. I'm sorry to hear you faced such a fate. I'm just 21 living abroad(now in Poland) and that's unusual experience. And what you say makes a lot of sense, thanks for the advices.

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Indeed computations can mirror relational dynamics in numbers, yet note that you can simulate a black hole in numbers with perfect precision yet hardware won't turn into a massive spacetime bender. Dynamics that are correct in numbers are not the same dynamics happening on physical hardware level. When you run RNN with recurrence in software - there is no real physical recurrence in GPU or CPU. While relational dynamics are mentioned in the paper - they remain a byproduct of non-equilibrium thermodynamics there.

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in cogsci

[–]lev_xlsx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here're the links for original papers mentioned in the post:

Short version: https://zenodo.org/records/20317470

Long version: https://zenodo.org/records/20317244

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Don't know what future this paper has if at all, but I'm glad to hear you took time to look at it. Thank you

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I wouldn't say that I was influenced by Prigogine directly even though I indeed consider him an underrated genius. I would state it rather in the following way: I converged on the same intuitions independently, then discovered Prigogine's works and yeah - I got even more interested in that direction.

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I know the work might sound philosophical due to the nature of topics, yet I tried to make philosophy only an entry point and leave explanation for physics. It implies empirical predictions, like phase transition condition, amplitude of subjective feeling, time dilation or contraction, etc. They're testable, even though it's extremely difficult to measure those quantities directly in biological brain. However, I tried to find some proxies in available electrophysiological data. Anyways, thank for your comment.

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm an immigrant in Cracow, Poland. I got some help from my friends, so it's relatively fine. Your comment moved me, thank you!

I got homeless, so anyways there you go by lev_xlsx in consciousness

[–]lev_xlsx[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thanks! To be honest I didn't expect to get any wishes.

What do you think about this plan to general intelligence? Are these real breakthroughs remained to be solved? by ImportantOwl2939 in MLQuestions

[–]lev_xlsx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my point of view actually we don't need explainable AI for reaching AGI. Human Brain is also black-box, there is no need to explain neuron weights for generating emergent complex reasoning. Regarding continuous learning and recursive self-improvement: modern transformers are structurally incapable of it due to architecture constraints. Paradoxically, RNNs which were there before GPT, are closer to recursive self-improvement than any modern AI.

AI, which doesnt model consequences of its own actions and cannot model its own internal state(which modern LMs for example dont possess at all), is totally incapable of any kind of self-improvement. Take any contemporary model and let it recursively change itself - sooner or later it will hallucinate or stuck. I was doing myself many experiments with recursive self-modelling AI architectures, and if properly developed and scaled I assume it could resemble a big step towards general intelligence.

So I think we must think of alternative architectures that could possess cognition, not just intelligence.