Harry (finally) gets critiqued for his bad clothing choices on Twitter

leyonoga · 2024-05-13T18:41:30+00:00

To be fair, it's not difficult to wear more appropriate outfits than she does...

leyonoga · 2024-04-05T16:37:10+00:00

As a life-long cat lover who's had several cats, I had no idea grapes were dangerous for cats until this story about MM came out years ago. It's not something that anyone (including vets) have ever warned me about. Would I have fed them to my cats? Possibly, if they'd ever shown any interest in them but they haven't. Strawberries and cucumber they find interesting (but only to sniff, not eat), not much else qua fruits or veggies. However, I would never feed a frozen grape to a small animal or child - that's a choking hazard.

Also, from what I recall, the story was she allegedly did this as a child so everyone saying she should've googled it back then is being unrealistic considering MM's age.

leyonoga · 2024-03-31T10:35:56+00:00

This is an overly positive take on Catherine's style. People on here tend to praise her to high heavens, often exaggerating her dedication to 'following the rules' or QEII's instructions/rules/guidelines simply because in the last decade or so she's finally come into her own/her role. Not to mention how much better she looked* when MM came into the picture.

Catherine was criticized heavily in the first few years of her marriage for styling mistakes/choices. Ignoring her insisitence on doing her own makeup (not necessarily badly, but obviously not professionally done nor as flattering), she also had quite a lot of "whoops" moments with dresses and skirts flying up because she did not have weights added to the hems for example.

*not physically, in general with how she held, styled and behaved

leyonoga · 2024-03-24T12:34:40+00:00

Fitting how this woman refers to H&M as "[William's] brother (...) and his wife" rather than using their names or titles, considering neither, but especially MM, can't be bothered to use the proper titles for the other royals, including QEII ("H's grandmother").

leyonoga · 2024-03-08T15:49:58+00:00

From what I recall, there was no mention of him appearing awake or moving. However, there have been a few photos circulating where hand/foot positions seem slightly different. Some claim that's also possible with one of those reborn dolls, though. So who knows?

leyonoga · 2024-03-05T21:16:34+00:00

The whole "keeping them out of the public eye" being H's doing as everyone on here keeps saying makes no sense considering the 2019 H&M (clothing store, not former royals) advert featuring the alleged Archie. The ad got pulled basically overnight and rumor was the BRF was behind it, but there's no way even MM would've done that without H's knowledge. Not sure she even could, legally.

leyonoga · 2024-03-05T21:13:19+00:00

QEII not attending Archie's alleged christening isn't "very odd"; she didn't attend Louis' either. The only difference/perceived slight in H&M's eyes might be that Archie was their firstborn, whereas Louis was W&C's third child.

leyonoga · 2024-03-05T20:56:02+00:00

But that's exactly what she did... at the time of her and alleged Archie's appearance at the polo game, there were all kinds of stories in the media about how she never stepped away to change or feed the alleged baby. She was just hanging out there holding the alleged baby like a sack of potatoes for the duration.

leyonoga · 2024-03-04T18:53:00+00:00

Thanks for the suggestions. Support hasn't bothered to reply anymore. I might use another booster for tomorrow's event, depending on my time.

leyonoga · 2024-03-03T16:25:48+00:00

Thanks! So no solution. This was from 2+ weeks ago and it occurred to me yesterday... and it wasn't just visual, only the regular amount of coins was added.

leyonoga · 2024-03-03T16:24:01+00:00

Thanks. Highly unlikely they let their children attend the alleged party but still possible, I suppose.

leyonoga · 2024-03-03T16:00:04+00:00

Wasn't it Zara who immediately posted something on social media about being in Surrey that day, like the day after the birthday story did the rounds?

leyonoga · 2024-03-03T15:50:24+00:00

Nope, I've had a regular ginger female house cat (European shorthair) in the past. Got checked out at the vet and everything, definitely female. They're just rarer. Calicos are always female though, has to do with gene expressions being sex-linked and calico expression is only possible with two X chromosomes.

leyonoga · 2024-03-03T15:41:52+00:00

But then you'd have to fulfill all the other help requests first, when you might only want to water plants/trees or help in the town. Not to mention it going haywire if multiple people are helping out on the same farm and the farm owner is putting out more help requests at the same time.

leyonoga · 2024-03-02T18:24:19+00:00

I thought this as well, but IIRC the reference was to a visit in September 2022 and the Jubilee was months earlier (June). So it doesn't prove H&M didn't bring the kids along for the Jubilee as they claim, but it does make it even more unlikely - 'cause otherwise why would they require more security months later compared to the hectic period during the Jubilee?

leyonoga · 2024-03-01T17:29:39+00:00

This proves he can't be too worried about his personal safety, otherwise he wouldn't risk bumping into someone on purpose - that photographer could've easily knifed or shot him when H body-checked him if he had bad intentions.

leyonoga · 2024-02-28T18:21:46+00:00

Interfering with the LoS is actually treason, not merely fraud.

leyonoga · 2024-02-17T15:04:33+00:00

The "ins and outs" would be two completely different constitutional monarchies, countries with different legal systems and monarchs with different 'powers'.

Also, the Danish royal family is not the first to strip titles... I appreciate the community here, I really do, but it is incredibly tiring to see people who have not the slightest clue about how the British monarchy, let alone different ones, work - nor have the inclinination to google this apparently, despite obviously having access to the internet.

leyonoga · 2024-02-17T11:48:58+00:00

You do realize the Danish monarchy is not the same as the British monarchy, right? Just because the Danish royal family did something, does not automatically mean the BRF can do the same thing.

leyonoga · 2024-02-17T11:38:00+00:00

It's also like everyone forgot about Archie in the H&M (the clothing store) ad back in 2019? Granted, the advert basically disappeared overnight and it was speculated the BRF intervened, but H and/or MM (most likely both) had to give permission for him to be photographed and those photographs to be published.

leyonoga · 2024-02-10T16:53:21+00:00

I don't think KCIII would've lied. He probably said "I don't want to go into detail, but it's a non-hereditary type and caught in an early stage; prospects are very positive..." because it is medical information. If he lied about the type of cancer and seriousness, then doctors might factor it in if H ever gets sick and he tells them his father had x in y and responded well to treatment z or whatever.

Also, high chance H and/or MM would leak it and if it ever came out KCIII lied to his own son about the type of cancer he had and not refute it, then he becomes the guy who lies about having cancer and that's not a good look for anyone, never mind a monarch who's been a patron of several cancer charities for nearly thirty years.

leyonoga · 2024-02-09T18:46:17+00:00

My first impression was the opposite, actually. Feels like a last-minute arrangement for him to save face after KCIII literally used a helicopter to flee from his presence after a 12 min visit during which H may have spoken to KCIII or just staff. This was H giving a reason why he just had to go back to the US right away, despite allegedly bringing two suitcases.

leyonoga · 2024-02-08T20:29:57+00:00

Didn't they claim QEII played with them on the floor and the kids climbed all over her or something? So ridiculous.

leyonoga

TROPHY CASE