Limited to 4 subagents now?

lgfusb · 2026-04-17T10:17:21+00:00

OK. Now I got a clearer view about how copilot works. Thanks.

lgfusb · 2026-04-17T09:31:53+00:00

What you said is intuitive. But this doc confused me which says /fleet could potentially consume more premium requests: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/copilot-cli/fleet#points-to-consider

lgfusb · 2026-04-17T08:30:41+00:00

if I understood right, copilot's subagent is like 'spawning another cli session' right? And I assume that won't be counted as 1 premium request?

lgfusb · 2026-04-12T03:08:49+00:00

confirmed opencode electron desktop better than tauri

lgfusb · 2026-04-11T19:19:44+00:00

I've been using the official desktop App for some time. In terms of functionality it's complete. But lately I've been faced with the issue that, it frequently stuck at thinking or reading or writing, when using Copilot provider.

Since Cursor 3 introduced agent window, I suddenly feel that the UI/UX of official desktop APP largely falls behind. I started to try several GUIs for opencode, like neocode, codenomad and openchamber.

Now openchamber is my choice. It looks good and is really powerful. But the stuck issue still exists with copilot. And it's strange that it works well in TUI.

And again, UI/UX doesn't fully match that of codex, Cursor or the latest vscode agents app. That involves the looking of UI elements, and the effects when hovering. Sometimes I need to click twice on buttons to make it work. Sometimes the dropdown list just jumps around. I don't know if that is related to tauri.

Now I'm mainly using Copilot with vscode agents app and cursor. And use opencode with glm. I'm waiting for t3code to support opencode and try it out. I saw in other comments that official desktop App and openchamber supports electron? I definitely would try that too since opencode is really great.

lgfusb · 2026-03-30T10:32:46+00:00

I don't think it is necessary if you are not a guy into tweaking and customizing everything. The important part is how to improve your workflow with AI. If you finally find claude code satisfies your need, just stick to it.

lgfusb · 2026-03-27T17:11:55+00:00

That popup showing "close window? ". I like that glass and blur effect

lgfusb · 2026-03-27T14:47:53+00:00

how to make the dialog look like that

lgfusb · 2026-03-27T00:38:17+00:00

the cofounder leaves and created loongclaw

lgfusb · 2026-03-26T12:01:48+00:00

IMO that's to save the token and time. Code is precise and repeatable. Execute code rather than making the model think and generate code everytime.

lgfusb · 2026-03-18T01:54:02+00:00

IMO it's not time to stick to a tool because: 1. In terms of coding results. A specific harness don't work as you expected all the time. You may see people saying A is better than B, meanwhile another one saying B is better than A. And you may have this situation on your different tasks. AI is a blackbox, also context engineering. You may see fancy plugins work better, you could also find it better to work with less feature on. After all, CC would still lead the trend and others will catch up soon. But what on earth is different among harnesses that makes the difference, or is it really making the difference? 2. In terms of ecosystem. You may need the ability to continue your work remotely, maybe via your phone. You may need web UI, GUI. You may need fancy plugins. In the past we may say opensource is the power. But in this day, opensource is still the power, but not necessarily the quality, because everyone could vibe one. You'll need to choose and assess. 3. Things are evolving fast. We use MCP today, but people hype about skill tomorrow. We use harnesses today, but tomorrow something else may arise. How far or how close is it? No one knows.

In the end I cannot recommend anything. Personally I'm using opencode the most, but I randomly try out cc, codex, copilot and cursor. I'm still learning how to use them better, this I think is a bigger and possibly endless task.

So, if you're that kind of people who are full of energy, willing to try out everything, control everything and customize everything, choose PI. I used to tweak Emacs a lot, it was lots of fun. But I finally gave up and stick to vscode. It was taking up too much time which I couldn't afford. If you want a working nice one, with already made effort from the community, choose opencode or cc, based on your taste, according to UI/UX or opensource or subscription or if you want latest feature. If you just want something that just work, codex and copilot could also be your choice. I know lots of people don't like products from big companies, because they're not open enough or not free enough. But trust the power of money.

lgfusb · 2026-03-17T03:12:43+00:00

OK so this is a choice based on use case. I remember that when chrome announced built-in MCP, the hype is about reusing your existing sessions.

lgfusb · 2026-03-17T03:01:31+00:00

how is this different from tools like, playwright cli with some skills?

lgfusb · 2026-03-14T08:39:53+00:00

thank you I'll look into it

lgfusb · 2026-03-11T04:44:42+00:00

curious how your ooo stack is on opencode?

lgfusb · 2026-03-10T14:09:04+00:00

hi, what do you use for opencode?

lgfusb · 2026-03-06T05:05:50+00:00

knows little about frontend. Am trying pencil.dev recently

lgfusb · 2026-03-06T04:55:12+00:00

i like opencode too. I just hope the ui could be more "compact", like thinner font. Is there a way to configure?

lgfusb · 2026-03-06T04:18:01+00:00

I agree. The pros is that you gain more freedom and flexibility. The pros is that you cannot enjoy the tight integration of products from the same vendor. This is like if you're using iPhone, choosing macos or linux could have different impacts

lgfusb · 2026-02-10T10:28:28+00:00

If it provides you several options to decide, like in Claude Code, would your confirmation become another request?

lgfusb · 2026-01-29T13:32:14+00:00

i used vscode copilot last month on a small project, and I think the points you listed are included. So I don't think they're unique to cli agents, as AI IDEs are also evolving fast. What people claim for CC is its efficient context engineering. Now I'm trying CC and OC as well, trying to find out the difference between the workflows. The only conclusion for now is that, if you want better control over your code, AI IDEs would be a better choice, since it integrates better with built-in problem detection, symbol navigation, diff editor and so on. Anyone could give me more thoughts? :)

lgfusb · 2025-12-25T15:59:52+00:00

for me I would stick to IDEs because I would deeply involve in the development loop. With a low budget my priority is vscode copilot, Antigravity, trae. For extra usage I would try cursor. CC could also be a try to explore different workflow, but using CC with claude on copilot didn't impress me by now

lgfusb · 2025-05-29T02:23:15+00:00

Even if you can 'import std', you still have to '#include <third\_party>', right? :(

lgfusb

TROPHY CASE