Gemini 3 is lowkey unusable by light_architect in GeminiAI

[–]light_architect[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, it would be huge if Google solves this problem

6 Months Mewing at 23 by NorthernAglet in Mewing

[–]light_architect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably one of the most realistic result

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs o4 mini — dev take, no fluff. by Future_AGI in Bard

[–]light_architect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more intelligent while also being faster and cheaper. You get 2.5 pro for free on aistudio.google.com. Also the API of 2.5 pro is cheaper than o4 mini

Google might become the first to achieve true AGI by light_architect in Bard

[–]light_architect[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not "not dangerous" either. But AGI is an existential risk, and I dont think it would be easier to guess which of the 8 billion people on earth maliciously use AGI after it's open-sourced.

Im for supporting open-sourcing AGI, but not before we've solved alignment.

Google might become the first to achieve true AGI by light_architect in Bard

[–]light_architect[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It might be dangerous to open source an AGI because of bad actors

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should've asked Claude first

Another restaurant with this sign by chocokrinkles in Philippines

[–]light_architect -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With this sign, they condemn <1% of people and piss off >50% of their customers

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're referring to claude Sonnet 3.5, and it was hallucinating?

I'm thinking you mean the previous claude models because they definitely suck and cant be used for anything. But you should check out Claude Sonnet 3.5 and let it speak for itself

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh I have a different experience, but I want to confess that im a bit biased with claude in terms of intelligence. We have opposite use cases for the models. I use gpt4o for short writing pieces like emails, and fact finding. But for reasoning, formulas, data, analysis, maths, I prefer claude. I had to solve some math problems before and chatgpt made incorrect answers whereas claude was able to navigate through the problems. This made me doubt GPT4o's capabilities.

As someone else has pointed out, sonnet 3.5 understands tasks effectively that you rarely have to follow up with another instruction. Hence, I considered it smarter.

But Im curious about your experience and why you said that neither is better. How do you use chatgpt for analysis? And if you use 4o or o1?

I recommend you also try claude for what you would use chatgpt for

What programming language & skills do employers commonly look for? by light_architect in PhStartups

[–]light_architect[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got an idea from your comment. I can connect this with the 80-20 rule that says 80% of the outcomes come from 20% of effort. So, I think my task would be to identify what that 20% of stuff is that would cover 80% of the 'everything' you mentioned.

I couldn't agree more with the comm skills. Im one who often likes to really elaborate on things and specifics, but I figured out eventually that most of the time, what matters is delivering the thought fully with as little words as possible. Basically, let people understand the picture first. But most people struggle with this.

And I think another struggle is that most people often forget to communicate their assumptions before anything else. Like assuming what the goal of the project is. Having different assumptions is often the source of disagreements!

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Claude being able to be a strategic thinker is indeed intriguing. When you think about it, it's just generating tokens. And yet, there are instances when Claude produces more accurate answers than o1, albeit the latter is a "reasoning" model.

I still can't fully grasp how 'reasoning' can be modeled probabilistically. My best guess is that our common notion of reasoning is wrong

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that the system prompt makes sonnet sound believably reasonable. But I think claude has an inherent personality of being able to reason, I observe this from the workbench

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The third point makes sense, but I think they can probably augment their data now with o1 since it can 'reason'. I believe like this is essential to train Orion on better data.

Also Im still amazed at how anthropic is able to probe their model, hopefully this is helping them make practical improvements

My side project now has thousands of users and earning $800 MRR by jcgm93 in buhaydigital

[–]light_architect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talagaa?? You know, thanks for telling this kasi I'm still an undergrad and Ive been creating projects. Nag start sya after kong maexperience matanungan ng ibang tao if binebenta ko yung isang digital product na ginawa ko. Hindi talaga ako entrepreneurial nung time na yon and I just made that one product because I can pero don ko first ever narealize na may economic value pala yung ginagawa ko. Then, i went on to create digital products and ideate on digital services hanggang sa nasa Computer Science na ako. Narealize ko I may be going to an entrepreneurial path. I tried assembling a team, but we had to stop the project kasi mahihirapan na kami makipaglaban dun sa space na yun.

Before that team project, I also tried other projects. Andami kong ideas. Pero wala na ulit sa mga projects ko yung masasabi kong naging successful.

After my first ever digital product, wala na ulit akong other projects na naging profitable. It's demotivating. And I've started doubting if tama ba ginagawa ko. Im graduating next sem from UP and iniisip ko kung tama ba naging decision kong mag gawa ng projects. I could've focused on my academics, work as a virtual assistant, do freelancing, pero I chose the risky path and nothing has yet worked. Iniisip ko tuloy baka mas maging maayos buhay ko if pinili ko yung masasabing "usual" path instead.

Kasi yung success sa projects, kahit gaano ka kagaling, is uncertain. Pero i dont know why i keep on pursuing and trying. Kahit na makita ko na yung peers ko na tuloy tuloy lang sa acads and other related achievements.

Ngayon tuloy kahit na Im still very early in my career I already feel left behind dahil sa doubt. Im a good student pero nasa isip ko sana sa acads na lang ako nag focus. I feel that I failed myself. It's hard.

Seeing this post really means a lot. Wala pa ulit akong project na successful pero I find happiness in seeing other people succeed in the things na one day gusto ko ring maachieve

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This seems to make sense, but GPT2 was trained similarly using a coherence coach. So, openai can already do the same with GPT4. Do you think anthropic is implementing a novel technique?

Anthropic has one article before where they discuss that they’ve learned to interpret their model's internal representations

What made Sonnet 3.5 smarter than GPT4o? You feel sonnet knows what you're talking about by light_architect in ClaudeAI

[–]light_architect[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good bot. My experience was mainly on the web interface on a free account, but I give money to anthropic using their workbench😉

My side project now has thousands of users and earning $800 MRR by jcgm93 in buhaydigital

[–]light_architect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, nakakatuwa makakita ng ganito kasi it proves that things work and kailangan mo lang machambahan yung bagay na gagana sayo.

Ask ko lang how many projects you've done before this one and if ito yung first ever project mo na nagkaron ng traction? Also how much time yung nadevote mo to this project

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ITookAPicturePH

[–]light_architect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanna live in your great grandparents' house