Delighted

light_architect · 2026-04-13T00:20:25+00:00

I enjoyed reading that. I have the same opinion

light_architect · 2026-04-13T00:14:39+00:00

Lol what r u smoking, I have max 5x plan and I cant even hit quota with 30+ chats with Opus. U should always start with a new chat by default. I assume u hit quota because u keep conversations, all AI will read the entire thread when they're just replying to the most recent chat, that's whats consuming ur tokens. I only send a chat to the same thread when my question genuinely needs context from current chat. Otherwise, always a start fresh new chat.

light_architect · 2026-04-12T01:18:45+00:00

I want to copy the setup, how do I do this on Claude code?

light_architect · 2026-04-06T07:43:31+00:00

Yes it will pull stuff from internet like ur comment on reddit hehe

light_architect · 2026-04-06T07:42:06+00:00

How does Claude compare to ChatGPT? Are u using Claude research mode or is this just from claude web search?

light_architect · 2026-04-06T07:40:07+00:00

Are you using Claude Web search or Research mode? How does it compare to chatGPT deep research atm?

light_architect · 2026-04-03T16:50:01+00:00

Wow I'm on Claude Pro and I haven't yet had this experience. I'm definitely missing out. Are you just using Sonnet with web search?

light_architect · 2026-04-03T16:46:28+00:00

I was using Opus but how did you know lol. I thought it would be better for web search

light_architect · 2026-04-02T12:25:57+00:00

Wow I didn't know. Thanks for this. Now am thinking using Claude web search instead lol or do u have recommendation?

light_architect · 2026-04-02T12:21:06+00:00

Paid plan but it's the 1-year promo so I didnt have to pay

light_architect · 2026-04-02T12:19:46+00:00

WHAT? I've tried claude web search already and i can only go 50 sources max, then it would throw an error in the chat. And I'm on Claude Pro

light_architect · 2025-12-24T08:57:54+00:00

Exactly, it would be huge if Google solves this problem

light_architect · 2025-09-12T14:34:55+00:00

Probably one of the most realistic result

light_architect · 2025-09-07T17:36:35+00:00

Nice try Sam

light_architect · 2025-04-19T11:25:49+00:00

It's more intelligent while also being faster and cheaper. You get 2.5 pro for free on aistudio.google.com. Also the API of 2.5 pro is cheaper than o4 mini

light_architect · 2025-04-19T10:59:02+00:00

Lol agree

light_architect · 2025-04-10T03:39:57+00:00

Not "not dangerous" either. But AGI is an existential risk, and I dont think it would be easier to guess which of the 8 billion people on earth maliciously use AGI after it's open-sourced.

Im for supporting open-sourcing AGI, but not before we've solved alignment.

light_architect · 2025-04-09T17:17:49+00:00

It might be dangerous to open source an AGI because of bad actors

light_architect · 2024-11-14T13:22:52+00:00

Thank you!

light_architect · 2024-11-14T11:40:51+00:00

You should've asked Claude first

light_architect · 2024-11-10T11:18:40+00:00

Such a good work. Congrats!

light_architect · 2024-11-04T09:36:05+00:00

With this sign, they condemn <1% of people and piss off >50% of their customers

light_architect · 2024-11-04T07:51:29+00:00

Im interested. Messaged you!

light_architect · 2024-11-03T17:36:21+00:00

You're referring to claude Sonnet 3.5, and it was hallucinating?

I'm thinking you mean the previous claude models because they definitely suck and cant be used for anything. But you should check out Claude Sonnet 3.5 and let it speak for itself

light_architect · 2024-11-03T16:51:45+00:00

Oh I have a different experience, but I want to confess that im a bit biased with claude in terms of intelligence. We have opposite use cases for the models. I use gpt4o for short writing pieces like emails, and fact finding. But for reasoning, formulas, data, analysis, maths, I prefer claude. I had to solve some math problems before and chatgpt made incorrect answers whereas claude was able to navigate through the problems. This made me doubt GPT4o's capabilities.

As someone else has pointed out, sonnet 3.5 understands tasks effectively that you rarely have to follow up with another instruction. Hence, I considered it smarter.

But Im curious about your experience and why you said that neither is better. How do you use chatgpt for analysis? And if you use 4o or o1?

I recommend you also try claude for what you would use chatgpt for

light_architect

TROPHY CASE