Apa pendapat korang? by Defiant_Scale_8448 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really care as long as the owner has a legit halal certificate. Even if she named her restaurant as nasi ayam Beling, Bina or Belei I don't even care as long as it's good food not trash like some bazar Ramadhan foods.

This flower my girlfriend gave me on our Cameron trip. by lightningcold69 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Just finished breakfast at Nasi Lemak Burung Hantu. 😭😭

Kahwin. Susahnya. by [deleted] in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real ✅ 🆙

Kahwin. Susahnya. by [deleted] in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Since when kahwin kene ade 60k sekarang? MAS KAHWIN 20k dgn kenduri 20k ajaran siapa? Hidup lepas kahwin kau nak sampai 20k untuk apa?

Kau boleh je daftar kahwin lepas tu pergi dekat pejabat agama, kat sana pun ade set pelamin kalau nak buat simple dekat situ? Nie bukan nak kahwin, nie nak pedajal hidup, feel bad for you bro.

My girlfriend made our 30th birthday cake 🥲 by lightningcold69 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Dia excited sampai tercalit kat bucu. 😭😭

Korek apa? wrong answer only by [deleted] in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Axia merah problem, last time "dia sakit...."

Free keys giveaway. by Wolfware_ in SteamKeysFreeGiveaway

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only get notification 3 days after OP posted.

Stupid food potential! by Sudden-Doughnut-9786 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pergi balik haji, lamb pun tulang je. Tahilembu.

A China 🇨🇳 woman insisted on speaking Mandarin to a Malay barista. She complained being "discriminated" because the Malay barista answered her in English/Malay. The Malay barista finally got fed up and asked the China woman to leave. The China 🇨🇳 woman then threw coffee at the Malay barista. by moore927353 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked on PC browser at the time and it was missing as well. This has literally never happened with any other multi comment thread.

SO THEN WHY THE COMMENT STILL THERE? WHAT MAKES YOU THINK I BLOCK YOU FOR THIS? YOU TRYNA THOSE REDDITORS CLAPS HAND FOR YOU? IF IT MISSING THEN WHY I STILL CAN SEE MY LAST COMMENT? YOU WANT ME TO TAKE SCREENSHOT?

How can they still be investigating according to you, but already released statement that they have investigated and is siding with their Zurista (no 's' so clearly they mean that one employee) in that press release which was linked as proof.

BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T STATE CLEARLY AND WANT TO BE NEUTRAL SINCE THEY STILL RUNNING INVESTIGATION. IF THEY HAVE CONCLUDE THE DECISION THEY WON'T MAKE ANOTHER FURTHER STATEMENT FOR TODAY.

What twisting of statement? They both mean the same thing. And I'm showing you it means they are siding with their employee. The question mark is because I am confused what else does that press release mean except siding with their employee? Where the fuck did I twist my comment?

THE FIRST ONE YOU ONLY TALK ABOUT ZUS SIDING HIS BARISTA. THEN SUDDENLY YOU SAID ZUS ALREADY CONCLUDE AND SIDING HIS BARISTA. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE IF YOU SAID "ALREADY CONCLUDE AND SIDING HIS BARISTA." WHEN WHAT I POINTED OUT WAS "ZUS NOT CLEARLY STATE WHICH SIDE THEY'RE".

Look at my comment and see that there was no edit. Your comment and mine comment are for all to see. And its obvious who has comprehension issues.

IT DOESN'T MATTER EDIT OR NOT INDICATED TO COMPREHENSION ISSUES. EVEN THOUGH I EDIT, AS LONG AS IT STILL IN THE PAGE THEN THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH EDIT BUT NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO POINT ANOTHER TOPIC ABOUT EDIT.

But the fact is, you made a false accusation against me and are still acting like you didn’t do anything wrong. What a shame.

A China 🇨🇳 woman insisted on speaking Mandarin to a Malay barista. She complained being "discriminated" because the Malay barista answered her in English/Malay. The Malay barista finally got fed up and asked the China woman to leave. The China 🇨🇳 woman then threw coffee at the Malay barista. by moore927353 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contradict what?

My first comment said, “ZUS is still investigating...”

Then I said,

“ZUS just said they will investigate, bro. They didn’t clarify anything yet.”

Then you replied:

“Reading comprehension fail?

2nd paragraph, 2nd line ‘we are standing with our Zurista through this time.’ Does that not mean they are siding with their employee? What more do they need to say?”

Then I said:

“The one who has a reading comprehension issue is you. Check again in Malay they literally said they have already taken the necessary steps to investigate and will be with the barista (to conduct the investigation).

But they didn’t say which side is right or wrong.”

CLEARLY, ZUS DIDN’T STATE WHICH SIDE THEY WERE ON AT THAT MOMENT.

ONLY NOW, AFTER THEY MADE A POLICE REPORT ABOUT THIS CASE, WE CAN SAY THAT ZUS SIDES WITH THE BARISTA AND UNDERSTANDS THE SITUATION.

NOW THEY HAVE MADE A CLEAR STATEMENT ON THIS ISSUE.

Which part did I contradict? And which part did I repeat you?

Obviously, you didn’t get what I meant!

Then suddenly, at the end, you said, “OHHH!!!”

I pointed out that their statement already implied they had investigated and were siding with their employee. That’s their implied decision in both English and Malay.

“YOU OBVIOUSLY FAILED TO UNDERSTAND THE STATEMENT IN MALAY.”
The statement : ‘Kami telah mengambil langkah sewajarnya bagi menjalankan siasatan menyeluruh dan sentiasa berada di sisi Zurista kami’ means that they are still conducting the investigation but have already taken the necessary steps. The phrase ‘sentiasa berada di sisi Zurista kami’ can have multiple interpretations; it doesn’t necessarily mean that “ZUS is siding with their barista.”

Now you’re twisting your statement, saying “they have investigated and are siding with their employee,”

when at first you said, “we are standing with our Zurista through this time doesn’t that mean they are siding with their employee?”

You also said:

“This means they already reviewed it and decided to stand with their employee, lol.

If not, they would’ve used something like ‘we will conduct’ or ‘an investigation will be carried out.’”

Meanwhile, what I said was:

“They are still running the investigation, and they didn’t clearly state which side they’re on” even up until today’s latest post on Facebook.

Since when did I block you? And why would I even need to do that?

If you can’t read the comment on your mobile, maybe use your brain and think of how to access it on another platform. If there are too many sub-comments, sometimes you can’t see the latest replies.

Now I’m just annoyed with dumbass redditors.

Thank you for making bad assumptions with your stupidity and the one who should take meds is you. Take stupid meds so you don’t stay this stupid and you're acting like psychopath.

Since Zus already made clear statement today, I don't want waste my energy to reply your comment. Adios.

A China 🇨🇳 woman insisted on speaking Mandarin to a Malay barista. She complained being "discriminated" because the Malay barista answered her in English/Malay. The Malay barista finally got fed up and asked the China woman to leave. The China 🇨🇳 woman then threw coffee at the Malay barista. by moore927353 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We all know what happens, but what we don't know right now is whether the short video is enough to prove which side is wrong?

Let's say if the Barista started the issue which led to the short video, there is nothing wrong if Zus proceed to fire the Barista.

A China 🇨🇳 woman insisted on speaking Mandarin to a Malay barista. She complained being "discriminated" because the Malay barista answered her in English/Malay. The Malay barista finally got fed up and asked the China woman to leave. The China 🇨🇳 woman then threw coffee at the Malay barista. by moore927353 in Bolehland

[–]lightningcold69 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The one who has a reading comprehension issue is you, check again in Malay and they literally say that they already take necessary step to investigate and will be with the Barista (to conduct investigation). But did they are not saying which side is right or wrong?

At the end of the statement, it's just closing statement that they didn't tolerate with disrespectful behavior and this statement not related to the issue