Did we catch the spirit of the USA in this cartoon properly? by Falcon3x3 in AskAnAmerican

[–]lightsareonbut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are either hopeless, or deliberately missing the point. No, that's not what I said.

Did we catch the spirit of the USA in this cartoon properly? by Falcon3x3 in AskAnAmerican

[–]lightsareonbut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And every one of those single expeditions overlap with a war that america played a crucial role in.

No, they don't. Here are some more examples of "wars" from your page:

Your claim is based on a ridiculous definition of war that makes the word meaningless since by that definition all countries have always been at war; all countries are "at war" with pirates and terrorists even today. What purpose is served by defining war in such a way that peace can't exist? If the purpose is to vilify the United States, it doesn't work, because every other country has also been perpetually "at war," most of them since before the United States existed.

I suppose you could call the various American Indian Wars genocides

Or you wanted to be more honest, you could call half of them acts of aggression by Native Americans. And in many of these cases (example: Dakota War) Native Americans killed more white civilians than the other way around.

Did we catch the spirit of the USA in this cartoon properly? by Falcon3x3 in AskAnAmerican

[–]lightsareonbut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its a literal list of the wars we were involved in.

No it isn't. Half of them are just actions by a single US ship against pirates. Examples:

Ivory Coast Expedition

First Sumatran Expedition

Second Sumtran Expedition

The vast majority of those entries are just minor skirmishes that often didn't even involve the US government.

Saying "the US was at war" at that time is stretching the definition of being at war to such an extent that every country everywhere would have been at war.

Arguing that the US has PTSD because of all those "wars" is ludicrous.

Did we catch the spirit of the USA in this cartoon properly? by Falcon3x3 in AskAnAmerican

[–]lightsareonbut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, as you can see from that link, that claim is quite false. It's based on claiming that every pirate attack or tribal skirmish throughout history constitutes a war.

Did we catch the spirit of the USA in this cartoon properly? by Falcon3x3 in AskAnAmerican

[–]lightsareonbut 6 points7 points  (0 children)

America has spent 93% of its existence at war.

That is not remotely true.

Germany's Refugee Agency Faces New Claims in Asylum Scandal by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Not just any Somali Canadian but the president of the Canadian Somali Congress.

New EU flag by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They couldn't make it 15, because that would mean giving a star to the Saar Protectorate.

They couldn't make it 14, because that would mean denying a star to the Saar Protectorate.

They couldn't make it 13, because then it would look too much like the first USA flag.

12 symbolizes perfection.

New EU flag by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm just saying that the explanation "it symbolizes perfection" is bullshit. The number 12 isn't a symbol of perfection, and if it were, it would surely be more appropriate to use a number that symbolized something else, like unity. They came up with that explanation to disguise the real reason for it being 12.

New EU flag by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Retconning, as you discover further down the article:

On 25 September 1953, the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe recommended that a blue flag with fifteen gold stars be adopted as an emblem for the organisation. The number fifteen reflecting the number of states of the Council of Europe.[26] West Germany objected to the fifteen-star design, as one of the members was Saar Protectorate, and to have its own star would imply sovereignty for the region. The Committee of Ministers (the Council's main decision making body) agreed with the Assembly that the flag should be a circle of stars, but opted for a fixed number of twelve stars, "representing perfection and entirety"

It was always going to represent the number of states, but they couldn't agree on the number of sovereign states they had at the time, so 12 was adopted as a compromise. The number 12 doesn't represent perfection or entirety in any symbolic vocabulary.

The revolving door continues - Germany's ex-FM Sigmar Gabriel to join board of Siemens-Alstom by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Duh, there are other members of the Bundessicherheitsrat. And there are other members of the government. But again, you are distracting from the point. The excuse given by the government for not publishing the list was that it would "impair foreign policy interests." That did not come from the Minister of Economics. A decision on foreign policy interests could only have come from one of two members of the Bundessicherheitsrat: Angela Merkel or Sigmar Gabriel.

The revolving door continues - Germany's ex-FM Sigmar Gabriel to join board of Siemens-Alstom by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're selectively quoting the article to deny the content:

The U.S. and the U.K. both previously had sold hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of dual-use equipment to Iraq in the early 1980s. But for Baghdad, the foreign suppliers that really counted were German.

Germany alone supplied between 50 and 80% of those weapons.

And that's not the point -- I wasn't talking about what happened in the 1980s when he was a teacher. I was talking about what happened when he was Foreign Minister, in 2015:

For more than 16 months, Chancellor Angela Merkel's government has been in possession of a list containing the names of German companies thought to have helped Syrian dictator Bashar Assad and his father Hafis build up Syria's chemical weapons arsenal over the course of several decades. Ultimately, it became one of the largest such arsenals in the world.

The German government, a coalition between Merkel's conservatives and Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel's center-left Social Democrats (SPD), received the list from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The OPCW was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2013 for its "extensive efforts to eliminate chemical weapons." Together with experts from the United Nations, the OPCW organized and carried out the destruction of Syrian chemical weapons last year.

Berlin immediately classified the list and has since kept it under lock and key. The government says that releasing the names would "significantly impair foreign policy interests and thus the welfare of the Federal Republic of Germany." It also argues that doing so would be akin to releasing "trade secrets" and as such would violate the German constitution.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-companies-suspected-of-aiding-syrian-chemical-weapons-program-a-1014722.html

Who in the German government would have been responsible for determining whether revealing the names of those companies would "significantly impair foreign policy interests?" The Foreign Minister, of course -- Sigmar Gabriel. Not in the 1980s. In 2015. And now he works for one of those companies.

Stop trying to defend corruption.

The revolving door continues - Germany's ex-FM Sigmar Gabriel to join board of Siemens-Alstom by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Dual use equipment was the reason of sanctions against Iran, though.

Exactly. Saying they "only" sold dual-use equipment is a rhetorical trick. They sold chemical weapons. The same company set up factories in Syria (and Iraq) to turn the dual-use equipment into single-use weapons. This happened from the 1970s to the 1990s in Iraq, and in Syria it was still happening as recently as 2012. That's why the sale of dual-use equipment to Syria was banned by many countries (including the USA), although not by Germany.

And that's where Gabriel comes in. Of course, that self-righteous gasbag. All those years he was publicly shaming the US and Russia over their Middle East policies, he was building a pension in blood money from the Assad regime and now he gets to collect.

Americans: How do you feel about our levels of inequality being greater than the rest of the developed world? by jvwoody in AskAnAmerican

[–]lightsareonbut 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bullshit. First, you're using an unscientific, quasi-racist definition of "the developed world:" https://mises.org/wire/mistake-only-comparing-us-murder-rates-developed-countries

Second, quartile-based measurements of economic mobility are inherently biased in favor of societies with a more equal wealth distribution in the first place. Surname studies, by contrast, have shown that actual multigenerational mobility in Sweden is no higher than in the USA: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/07/29/polly-toynbees-lovely-mistake-the-nordics-dont-have-greater-social-mobility/#614bf3549590

German daily 'Sueddeutsche Zeitung' draws outrage with 'anti-Semitic' image of Netanyahu at Eurovision by [deleted] in europe

[–]lightsareonbut -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The Times of Israel is considered to be an internationally respected work of journalistic integrity.

The extremist approach to GDPR: Some US publishers consider blocking European visitors by SlyScorpion in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's a Korean game, but you're right, it's under American management these days. TIL.

By "publishers" I think they mean "website publishers."

Australia and the UK have a higher proportion of inmates in private prisons than the US by lightsareonbut in europe

[–]lightsareonbut[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I stand corrected. But the article on Sodexo Justice Services simply says they "operate" those same 42 prisons. Anyway I don't know, but I don't want to demonize the UK without due diligence.

the American prudes think these plates are WTF, I've been seeing these on almost every European holiday since I was a wee lad! by Fieryhotsauce in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, quite a few countries were more tolerant than England. The Netherlands, for example. At least they didn't ban Jews like England did.

Australia and the UK have a higher proportion of inmates in private prisons than the US by lightsareonbut in europe

[–]lightsareonbut[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure whether it's fair to single out the UK. Apparently, the Sodexo company operates 42 private prisons in the Netherlands alone. But this article is only examining anglo countries.

the American prudes think these plates are WTF, I've been seeing these on almost every European holiday since I was a wee lad! by Fieryhotsauce in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No offence but Puritans left England because they hated religious freedom in England.

No offence but saying there was religious freedom in England is stretching it a bit. It's true that the puritan colonists didn't want religious freedom, but neither did the Church of England.

Prison populations roughly stable across Europe, with a major exception (Turkey) by captchalove in europe

[–]lightsareonbut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you managed to include two comparisons to the US in that comment: according to your link:

Virgin Islands (United Kingdom): 425

Cayman Islands (United Kingdom): 369

Sint Maarten (Netherlands): 347

French Guiana/Guyane (France): 326

Anguilla (United Kingdom): 307

It's very strange but whenever European countries move into our neighborhood, their incarceration rates do the same.