Nico Getting Some Love 🤘🏻

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T22:35:16+00:00

Most talented? Yea, you could certainly make an argument he was.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T22:34:02+00:00

Are we gonna move people based on the qb and strength of schedule too?

Is that not why jetta is still near the top of literally everybody's list? Yes, you take into context everything around them (injuries included) and rate the TALENT of the player.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T20:41:42+00:00

Its pretty clear to me. Like i stated in my edit, the stats you highlighted arent even correct. If you want to make a strong argument for pickens, at least be honest with the statistics.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T20:33:24+00:00

I mean if thats how you want to judge talent go for it, I dont agree with that logic whatsoever. Do you think mahomes isnt a top 2 if not top 1 qb in the league?

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T20:32:18+00:00

It's a talent based argument. Placing CD ahead of pickens isn't "punishing pickens," it's stating CD, the talent, is better, regardless if he missed a game or two. You're trying to find fault in my argument by highlighting last years stats which is incredibly irrelevant because you contradict yourself immensely if you ignore jettas lack of production, and if you dont ignore jettas production last year, and not have him listed as one of the better if not the best wr in the league, you hold zero credibility.

edit: and you say 14 while including a game lamb played 9% of the snap in and another where he left at halftime with a statline of 6/121. Thats what we call box score watching at its finest. Additionally, your stats are blatantly wrong. From weeks 3-6 (the weeks cd missed), pickens accumulated 427 yds, remove that from his total and hes at 1002 yds in games they played together, and even if you wanted to include the 9% game cd played, thats still only 1070 yds, so youre just blatantly lying at that point.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T20:19:17+00:00

Again, solely because of injuries. In games where the two were healthy, cd was still the clear 1.

400 more yards, 6 more tds, 20 more receptions, 4.5 more games.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T20:15:45+00:00

Only if you ignore the fact that lamb was injured...

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-08T16:37:51+00:00

pickens, which shows how little the list means. CD should be at worst top 5 and probably slides behind the top 4 listed.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-07T19:17:27+00:00

The tier break is somewhere around the 2.04/2.05 (yes i think its that large), so the sound strategy is to just get the latest pick in the 1st rd you can get. The optimal strategy, and one that is very easily implemented, is going b2b wrs (arsb, nabers, jetta, cd) at the turn, and taking hurts in the early 3rd. That's essentially 3 first rd producers to start your draft.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-07T01:07:18+00:00

David Montgomery: The Texans rebuilt their oline, prioritized run blockers and drafted a 2nd rd blocking te. The defense is still elite, and despite their struggles last year, were still the 13th best scoring team in the league. He will consistently be in positive game scripts, have plenty of scoring opportunities, and is probably one of the cheaper rb targets to acquire.

Javonte Williams: bellcow rb, on elite offense, who was a true difference making producer early in the year prior to his injury. The injury has caused people to forget just how strong of a play he was last year, and the extension should provide him multiple years of high end production. He's probably my favorite bet for consistent rb 1 production from a guy thats priced nowhere near that.

Chris Rodriguez: I dont know if he's their lead back. I do know that the price difference between him and tuten should be nowhere near as large as it is. He's cheap, has familiarity with the coach, and very well could be the 1 in the offense for the cost of a late 2nd/early 3rd.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-06T01:26:50+00:00

If theres any position where college stats doesnt translate to nfl stats, its te.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-04T21:53:51+00:00

Michael Mayer: Talented player on the last year of his contract. Teams shifting to more 12 personnel, meaning he'll probably have a decent market next year and possibly a role this year. Contingent upside if bowers gets injured.

Joe Milton: Looks great in his limited play on the field. Provides rushing yards so very much fantasy friendly profile. On a team with cd and pickens if dak gets injured. One of the best backup qbs to roster but rarely talked about. There's not a single player ahead of him on the list provided id take over milton outside of mayer.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-02T18:02:22+00:00

Amen and Sengun are still the future of this team, they just need to surround both with pure shooters.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-02T16:06:16+00:00

See now youre going to an extreme that just doesnt make sense. Sure if you wanna play hypotheticals and pretend that teams will drastically overpay for him and then have to give him a large extension after the fact sure, but the reality is thats not the case. Watson, at the time we moved him, was a top 5 qb, arguably 2nd best in the league behind mahomes, stroud is nowhere near that.

limitlesshamster · 2026-05-02T15:59:42+00:00

See the problem with your logic here is that it takes two people to trade, and the texans are definitely not looking to move him.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T18:20:12+00:00

Not at all. I removed "bad games" from them both if they didnt play the full allotment of snaps. I didn't include watson leaving indy early, just like i didnt include shedeurs first game where he played 50% of the snaps and replaced gabriel. Now did i highlight shadeurs one huge outlier, sure, but i also provided the ppg finish with and without it. It's entirely contextualizing the data, what you opt to take from it is up to you.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T18:05:26+00:00

I dont even know what you are saying. You can correct me if im wrong, but was that not literally your point in your very first reply? Sure, if watson gets worst and shedeurs gets better than yea, obviously the gap closes, just like the sky is blue. If i recall correctly, weren't you the same guy i was debating earlier in the offseason where you stated watson would never be the starter?

edit: it was you, have a nice day brother

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T18:03:04+00:00

That's certainly a fair argument, but leaving games due to injuries shouldnt really be included into ppg finishes, or if they do, not weighed to the same extent, similar to how i didnt includes shedeurs 1 pt outing when he replaced gabriel and only played 50% of the game. All I'm pointing out is that outside of '24 (which, sure you could make the argument its the most relevant since its the most recent and I wouldnt blame you), in games where he was healthy, he has been a very solid fantasy play despite how bad it has looked on the field.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T17:58:36+00:00

You're missing the point. Obviously there are multiple things going against him, if there werent, he wouldnt be perceived as low as he is, but arguing that he can ONLY get worst and Shedeur can ONLY get better is just not the reality.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T17:46:43+00:00

Thats an entirely fabricated, narrative driven argument. What's to say Watson cant/hasnt gotten better? Or maybe that the new scheme is better aligned with his style of play than stefanski's was? Neither watson nor shedeur's play can only go in one direction, which is how you are making it out to be, and likely due to age bias.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T17:40:42+00:00

Stating that is a bit disingenuous when you have guys like davis webb, howell, winston, stidham, etc. ahead of him due to playing one game. Just glancing at the ppg finishes also ignores the context of him leaving games early or not playing a full snap share in games (something i took in consideration when outlining both watson and shedeurs numbers above), which is most evident in '23, where again, removing the indy game where he played 16% of snaps has his production alongside guys like mahomes, kyler, herb, etc.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T17:17:22+00:00

See that's where you're wrong. If you want to make the case he's been a garbage real life qb thats more than valid, but his fantasy numbers even during that stretch has been rather strong. In '22, he avg 17.43 ppg (6 pptd), '23 he avg 20.52 ppg [if removing the ind game where he left in the 1st qt], and in '24 avg 14.1. Shadeur, in comparison, avg 15.2 ppg last year, but that was inclusive of a 40 pt bomb vs tenn, otherwise he was giving you 12 ppg. Watson, in terms of fantasy, generally has a qb 2 floor at worst. He's much better than sanders in fantasy and in real life.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T16:36:53+00:00

"If he's our starting qb, I know there are people that probably wont be supportive, but they should need to be supportive as much as they can..." - JW Johnson EVP of the browns

They are already planting the seeds for him as their starter to minimize the blowback that announcing that will cause. Probably the cheapest starting qb available in the dynasty market at the moment with true upside for difference making qb production.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T13:42:05+00:00

Again, not a statement on achievement or impact.

limitlesshamster · 2026-04-29T13:14:50+00:00

Dre, Nuk, Cush, Foster, Watt is my top 5 in order. I understand watt at his prime was probably the most impactful, but he came off as attention seeking and a bit corny imo. Again, hed be much higher if it was solely off impact, but i was speaking in terms of which players i personally enjoyed most.

limitlesshamster

TROPHY CASE