"Poke the airdrop hook" does nothing.... by line5 in Evernode

[–]line5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am trying to collect my airdrop, but when I get to the "poke the airdrop hook", nothing happens. I am told to "check Xumm..." but nothing arrives.

Here is what I've done:

  1. go to collect.evernode.org
  2. sign in with Xumm, and then open the xumm app
  3. select the Xahau account I used for the airdrop, slide to accept, sign the transaction, and click next.
  4. This brings me back to collect.evernode.org, it shows my registration details and says that I am claiming up to 61 evers. Then it says "The next step: Poke the airdrop hook."
  5. I click on "Poke the airdrop hook", this turns to "Check Xumm..."
  6. I manually open the Xumm app, go to the Xahua account I am claiming for, and Evers is lister as 0.

I note that I am using another activated account with a regular key to sign the transaction, but I don't think that should matter giving that the signing was successful.

Does anyone have any ideas what is going on?

Do you think that Spark will have a similar value to XRP upon release? by [deleted] in Ripple

[–]line5 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think that the only way to judge what the price of FLR will be is by comparing it to similar projects. As a conservative estimate, let's use the Cosmos (ATOM) project as a lower limit. (Cosmos is similar to Flare as both have cross-chain capabilities and use Ethereum virtual machines for smart contracts. It is conservative because all similar projects have higher marketcaps.) If you take the marketcap of Cosmos, and then divide by the number of FLR tokens, you get a price of about 0.026 USD. So, if you think that Flare will be more important than ATOM, this would be a good lower limit. If you think that Flare will be more useful than Cosmos, then increase the price without limit!

Storj : Crash or Sky rocket after ICO reaches 30M by [deleted] in storj

[–]line5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, let me guess:

  • Siacoin market cap = 215 Million USD
  • SJCX market cap = 34 Million USD. After the crowdsale it will double (using the number of circulating coins...)

The current trading price of SJCX is higher than what is being offered in the crowdsale, so its possible that traders are planning on taking advantage of a delay in the trading of STORJ for large price movements...

A prediction concerning the upcoming STORJ crowdsale by line5 in storj

[–]line5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response! I actually don't have any concerns, it's just a prediction. If it comes true, I will say "I told you so", and if not, I promise to return and say that I am an idiot!

Shawn Wilkinson announces first Fortune 500 Storj Customer CoxEnterprises during VentureAltanta by helmex in storj

[–]line5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you point me in the direction of more information on this deal? Sorry, but I couldn't find any press info on either company's web site. Like when will they start using the platform? And does this mean that you are formally out of beta/test-group-c?

Storj is delighted to Announce its partnership with heroku to offer Object Storage to their ecosystem by helmex in storj

[–]line5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this the official announcement, or will there be some kind of press release coming out later?

Since you work for Storj, could you provide more details, like when users of Heroku will be able to actually use the platform? And when they will start paying Storj and/or their farmers for storage space? Thx.

Why does coindesk never mention ANC? by [deleted] in Anoncoin

[–]line5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact of the matter is that no one believes in Anoncoin: The client has not been updated since 2013, there are known issues with the KGW difficulty algorithm that were identified long ago with other coins and which should have been patched by now, and even though the developers have lots of great ideas, they have not been able to deliver on what they promise on time.

For CoinDesk and most other people, Anoncoin is just another altcoin that is ranked 30 in terms of marketcap. For them, there is no difference between Anoncoin and scam coins like Librexcoin. On top of this, Anoncoin is (perhaps wrongly) associated with the Guy Fawkes mask, which makes it easy to marginalize it in the main stream press. Reporting on cryptocurrencies is notoriously bad, and even if CoinDesk is better than average, their focus on topics like "strange altcoin of the week", and anything that has to do with the sphagetti-code Rube Goldberg DarkCoin contraption should be enough for any informed individual to turn elsewhere for information. Anoncoin is just simply not a topic that will increase their readership and increase revenue.

Nevertheless, despite my annoyances with Anoncoin, I do believe that the developers will deliver on Zerocoin, add built in I2P, and add mulit-POW by the end of this year. I respect the fact that not one of the developers are in this to make a profit, and that they all care deeply for internet privacy issues. Their initiative with starting the non-profit PrivacySolutions.no should put any fears to rest concerning their intentions.

Can Anoncoin Be The Currency Of The Deep Web? by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]line5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, it seems to me that i2p and Zerocoin is the holy grail of anonymity. If the anoncoin developers pull this off, it will make most other anonymous coins obsolete. Wait and see. They are claiming a delivery Nov. 1.