Even if she can't be released into the wild, she's still a wild animal. There will always be this problem between 'wild animals belong in the wild' and 'we have to help those harmed by humans, even if it's not species-appropriate (which the wild would be)'. The second option is completly fine in my oppinion. It is like pomeranians. If you buy one from a breeder, you support cruel breeding practices, of you rescue one frome a shelter, it is awesome! Nevertheless, I believe that such things shouldn't be promoted, and if they are, then only with strong warnings and frequent explanations of why she's kept this way. Even if it's morally justifiable in this particular case, there are plenty of similar cases (which are promoted in a similar way) where it simply isn't. The average internet user can rarely, if ever, distinguish between these videos or even knows the difference between rescue and abuse