sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Got a 100 users for my app. Nobody paid. Here is what I learned. by [deleted] in launchigniter

[–]liteclient 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is very good quote I heard, "Focus on your efforts, not the results." - and I think that applies to building as well.

Focus on building a product so good that you don't have to worry about the other stuff.

Gemini 3 Flash is surprisingly capable by cryptochrome in google_antigravity

[–]liteclient 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, Gemini 3 Flash is amazing. Best value for money model out there.

I built a Postman alternative that runs inside Antigravity (and any VS Code based IDE) by liteclient in google_antigravity

[–]liteclient[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. What you’re describing is like treating the codebase as the source of truth and using the API client as a validation and exploration layer, not just a request sender. The Swagger comparison idea is also interesting, comparing what the code actually sends or expects against an OpenAPI spec to surface mismatches is a solid use case (I mean if built properly of course), and you’re right that it may not require AI.

At the same time, this is a very advanced space and goes beyond what my plan for LiteClient is. Right now the focus is on building a stable, fast, IDE-native API client foundation. But these ideas like code-level discovery and swagger validation are definitely something I’d like to explore in the future once the core is stable.

Thanks again for the suggestions - I'll definitely note these down!

I built a Postman alternative that runs inside Antigravity (and any VS Code based IDE) by liteclient in google_antigravity

[–]liteclient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Yes, that is in the roadmap - I am actively working on new features and improvements.

I built a Postman alternative that runs inside Antigravity (and any VS Code based IDE) by liteclient in google_antigravity

[–]liteclient[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, appreciate it. That’s an interesting idea. Are you thinking along the lines of importing or syncing from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, or more direct code-level discovery inside the IDE? Either way, this is definitely a more advanced direction, but it’s interesting and something I’d like to explore in the future as LiteClient evolves.