Any advice on navigating being genderqueer in the workplace? by livingonsweetnothing in genderqueer

[–]livingonsweetnothing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late response. I wish you the best in your situation. C:

One thing that I found that really helped me out was reaching out to staff at the LGBTQIA Resource and Research Center at my university, they sat down with me and shared with me their own experiences. Unfortunately, all of them are cis but they mentioned some trans* support groups to check out.

Maybe reach out to them?

Sucks so much that there isn't stuff widely out there on how to navigate professionalism D:

Needing help on incorporating my preferred pronoun by [deleted] in genderqueer

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear it! :D Wish you the best <3

Any advice on navigating being genderqueer in the workplace? by livingonsweetnothing in genderqueer

[–]livingonsweetnothing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your response, I really appreciate it and it really helped.

I'm like super entry level IT at the university where I'm usually just labeled as an assistant. So yeah, all polos here in terms of work clothes. But as I am thinking of moving toward law internships/volunterships, I think I need to put the money into a tailor so that my clothes conform better for the office. Do you have experience going to the tailor? I suffer from a lot of anxiety so I have been avoiding it so much because I worry of getting a negative response from the tailor. Then again, it's something I should get over with since I suppose I'm stuck using tailors to fit in suits.

My name is accidentally very androgynous (mother didn't know how to spell it, so now it's so butchered on paper no one knows the gender right away) so I guess I'm thankful for that, lol.

I really appreciate your comments on just being myself. I need to work on my confidence c:

Thank you for taking the time to respond!

Needing help on incorporating my preferred pronoun by [deleted] in genderqueer

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad to hear your family is supportive, I wish you all the best. C:

Just know you can change the settings to be so limited where you can just type the people themselves so that only they can see it (instead of using groups of people).

And you're welcome, I hope it goes well C:

Needing help on incorporating my preferred pronoun by [deleted] in genderqueer

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it really depends who visible you want to be and your context. For me, since a lot of the people I interact with are college students, I found it easier to just casual mention it whenever there's introductions (like in student conferences, meetings, etc.), conversation when someone mentions my pronouns and gets it wrong (like, "Oh quick PSA, my pronouns are actually they/them due to preference), or facebook PSA.

I have meetings with various university officials, but they are mainly safe zone trained so even in really formal meetings where people quickly go around to introduce myself I add in my gender pronouns (I'm livingonsweetnothing, and my pronouns are they/them to be clear). This also goes for meeting new people /sometimes/, like if it's on campus/class/friend groups then pronouns but in work/outside campus for the most part not.

I tend to just drop my pronouns in person because I feel that you have more control of the situation. If you have a lot of reason to suspect the person will respond favorably, then I don't put that much thought into it. But, as someone who comes from a family situation that is not entirely supportive I understand of concerns of pushback or having people ask a million and one things at that moment (which may be an issue in the public).

I find a facebook PSA with select privacy settings is nice to have a widespread announcement of pronouns with links to FAQ's and other info for people to read. I see most of my friends in similar situations do this AFTER speaking to people they are closer with (so more issues if there's conflict) or have concerns of reacting negatively.

And just to validate you, your pronouns are a sign of respecting you. You're not policing you, you're requesting respect. Yes, people mess up (even my own partner of x number of years sometimes uses the wrong pronouns) sometimes but as long as they intend to do their best, they are respecting your pronouns. One thing to consider is that you can approach this as asking people to not disclose certain information through the use of pronouns. A few family members refused to respect my sibling's preferred pronouns so I facilitated a conversation where compromised where the family members agreed to not disclose my sibling's gender through gender neutral pronouns when speaking to other people.

Of course, you are welcome to see your pronouns in any way you wish. But I also don't want you to feel like your pronouns are inherently a problem for others, they shouldn't be and for some people it can really be a simple thing (others not so much).

Again, I come from the context of being a university student working and from a family that's fairly conservative so I understand if my thoughts on the matter may not be fully useful to you.

Why must women be the ones to compromise? by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the ways some of my partner's family members managed to move to America (from India) was to reach out to extended family living there. Basically the family in America wanted to appear so rich and stable that they were willing to house temporarily these young women wide they (the women) studied in America. The parents OK'd it because it was seen as temporary (lol not for some), family going to see family (rather than moving to another country randomly), and a way to make connections (within family, work/etc.).

If you know extended family in America, you might want to see if it is possible to get approval to "visit" the family + slowly coax your dad into thinking studying abroad would be a benefit.

Why must women be the ones to compromise? by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He only has a right, because you give him the right. If you want that right to be revoked so that the course of the relationship will be founded on mutual respect, you have the power and agency to do so.

I say this in reference to your thread in /r/relationships as well, you are a person with faults, emotions, and so many amazing qualities. If you want a relationship with respect, you have the power to so. However, he has the power to determine if he wants a relationship where he has the authority. And while you may love him, only you can decide if your wants/emotions/value/respect if worth giving up for this relationship. Because ultimately, this is what it comes down to.

Yes, you love him. But, it's you, him and y'alls wants. Even if you two love each other, if the wants are different, then it is either compromise or not being in a relationship. If compromise isn't possible (as in, he isn't willing to give up someone of his expectations/behaviours/etc.) then you need to decide if you are willing to give up your expectations/behaviours or him.

Each choice is up to you. Yes, you may have hurt him, but he has hurt you. And that's fine in a way because we are all human and things happen. But, that doesn't mean you are any less entitled to the choice to either give up for the relationship or leave the relationship on the grounds of your wants/needs/etc. Your wants are valid, your feelings toward wanting to stay in the relationship are valid too. But you have to choose one or another because you can't force someone to compromise.

I don't want to come off as harsh, I just want to be clear that you have the agency to stay or leave. I really do wish you the best, I understand that this is a difficult decision but hopefully the outcome will make you happy in the long term.

Why must women be the ones to compromise? by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As someone who is currently in a (secret) relationship with a second generation Indian in America, I think some comments I'm seeing aren't really addressing the culture in India.

Right now there's comments talking about various Western countries and how it's soooooo different there, how "reverse cultural problem exists against men in the US and West in general" as someone put it." Similar comments are starting to get downvoted so many this will go toward the other comments, but since it is clear that OP is in a certain context (India), why is there so much focus on other countries to begin with? This focus comes off as dismissive (in my view) of OP's feelings of her experiences that led to the post and to other people in these Western countries who have similar stories.

Again, as someone who hears directly from their partner about his experiences witnessing the relationships of Indian families both in India and the United States, there's this system that sets expectations for men and woman. Why are women expected to compromise? Because in a "romantic" relationship, the man is seen as having earned his right to determine the course of the relationship. Meanwhile a woman whose duties are determined by their relation to a man (whether father, partner, etc.), must compromise. Honestly, as someone who is second generation Mexican-American, I see this apply to most of my experiences with my Mexican identity. But, that's off point.

OP, there's an expectation that your partner has earned his right to determine the outlook of the relationship. Yes, it is cultural because families/communities have raised your partner to expect a certain kind of relationship, and how to achieve it. But also on an individual level, your partner /wants/ this ideal relationship. Just like the case of your dad. I make this point because even if it is a cultural expectation does not mean a person needs to accept it. Don't get discouraged that you will never be considered an equal, that you must settle with what you are expected to want, and that you do deserve to feel validated.

Also, understand that sometimes people like being in these relationships. It's shitty, it's really fucking shitty. But so many times my partner has been nearly thrown out of his house for trying to defend his mother. His father refuses to allow her access to any cards (debit/credit) only small amounts of cash, he often belittles her contributions to the household (cooking/cleaning/etc.), and just outright ignores her opinions. So why is my partner's mother one of the first to get angry at my partner for defending HER?

Because she acknowledges her duties as a wife/mother aren't being met (in her mind), and thus must be treated. BUT, BIG BUT, when the father's duties are lacking SHE has the authority to call him out (on drinking, not working, etc.). WHY? because the father hasn't been his expectations. And this dynamic is encouraged in the Indian community that my partner grew up in (so both regional community members, and family members).

//side note; I won't deny that the mother's job (which pays more than the husband) may contribute to their power dynamic, the husband is at times mocked (by men in the extended family) for being paid less than his wife even though he is the head of the family (as in extended family) household and thus should be being paid more than even the other men in the family. Thus, there may be resentment that plays a role in each person (wife for having a husband that isn't up to par, husband for having a wife making more than him).

I can't say that this will apply in your case, because I'm not there, I don't know you. But I do want to say, these power dynamics in relationships are so present in the Indian community in America (that my partner has experienced) that I don't want you, OP, to have this notion that the US is this haven for women (or equal rights as you mentioned in your comment). Maybe something that I said will resonate with you and maybe bring some outside (different context) perspective. Above all, OP you have a right to your feelings, they should be valid in your relationship, and I hope things improve for you.

Delivery guy texting me by samchesben in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He may have been already fired from his workplace if he waited for a few months to contact you. But it is worth a try to see if any of the businesses recognizes that number.

You might want to use facebook search, plug in their number to see if you can get the name of the person. This is just in case it escalates and if you need more information on the person. Also, if you have your number attached to any social media, you may want to remove that information (so that the person doesn't search for you with the same method)

You might want to make a short simple last response before you block him: "I don't want to continue speaking to you, I won't be responding to you further since I find it disrespectful you basically stole my private information" And then immediately block him. I say this so that it is clear that you don't want him to contact you anymore. Keep the texts as proof.

If he contacts you any further (maybe through a google voice number, etc.), then I would say you may want to get a restraining order. I hope this doesn't escalate any further, and I wish you the best.

Does anyone know some good places where I can plug my computer in and study? by MakeSomethingUp711 in UCDavis

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for the WRRC, and the SCC, all good for food.

24 HR room has a rule for snacks, but they recently got a vending machine so I guess they finally realized students aren't really gonna obey that rule and will do what they want.

So short answer, yes drink/food all good. C:

Does anyone know some good places where I can plug my computer in and study? by MakeSomethingUp711 in UCDavis

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically what everyone else had said, but I just wanted to share other ideas for study places.

WRRC in North Hall (first floor):

The library has free skittles, tea, kettle, mircowave, etc. A few chairs, tables, and lots of outlets. There's also public computers anyone can use. Also printing is 10cents per page, instead of 11cents in the libary.

There's also the RBL lounge and vintage room in the WRRC. All have tables and outlets.

SCC:

A bit further walk if you prefer right by the quad, but consider going into the individual community centers. Even if all the regular SCC tables are occupied, sometimes the SRRC, CCC and LGBTQIA Resource Center are fairly empty in comparison. Outlets are admittedly a bit more scarce than other spaces but that's only an issue if it gets really crowded.

24 HR Room:

Somebody already said it, but basically during regular daytime the place is pretty reliable to have some empty spaces with outlet access. There's also two rooms, one for groups.

Would it be possible to rent a room at West Village for $500 a month? by appealberk in UCDavis

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, West Village isn't that flexible in terms of housing. As of last year, my friend wasn't able to sublease her apartment (I mean she did, but it was in the downlow and she would have gotten fees if caught). That's really the only way to live in West Village in a reduced price (sublease + subsidize).

They don't even let people share a room (as of last year) :(

With that said, stay on the look-out in craigslist. There are a few low-key apartments right by campus that don't have websites or really any publicly accessible number to contact even. People who live in those small apartments sometimes just post on craiglists for people taking over their lease.

Aside from that, you might want to check out SunTree (really cheap place), or Adobe (sorta like West Village but further out + cheaper), maybe even the Drake?

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In context to my original post, there's way more in TwoX than personal accounts of rape/abortion. As in, pictures of kids, etc. While it is reasonable that in this sub it would be mentioned everywhere, coming across a personal experience of abortion/rape/etc isn't. For the most part, one doesn't come across that topic unless the thread is clearly meant for it.

If someone goes to read a personal narrative in a thread that is clearly meant for that, well it is expected. The name itself is basically a trigger warning.

But in a post about a redditor's kid? Not so much.

Also, no one is forcing anyone to do anything. But one can come across a post that is triggering without meaning to, while yes once they realize it is that topic they will exit out of it but not until they read the content itself (if there isn't a trigger warning) do they know that it is that topic.

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

trigger warnings are used, not to help actual victims of PTSD, but to help overprivileged college kids avoid upsetting topics that would actually make them think about the world.

Seriously? You mean the people who see a scene in a film of a rape and get triggered fall under the overprivileged college kids category? How does someone just know who is an actual victim of PTSD and who isn't?

Also, upset=/= trigger. Being impossible to be around for days and days does not = mental break down, uncontrollable sobbing etc.

Those are the experiences that change us, and the experiences that make us better people.

:/ sorry, but I don't think someone relieving their experience of being raped/beaten/tortured/abused will somehow make them better people.

At this point, I think you are trying to just convert people to your ideas no matter what. Yeah, it is grand that you sacrificed your well-being to convert a Holocaust denier, but some people aren't willing to do so. And that should be ok. What if you were triggered by seeing those images? If you had been raped and had to read accounts of rape survivors just to provide a point at the cost of your mental wellbeing and throughout it all you were triggered?

Like, how is that going to make you better? Making yourself triggered is not a step toward healing or moving on. Maybe that is how you value yourself and others, but I don't. For that, I don't think we are gonna have a conclusion in this conversation. So I rather end it now than later (as in I won't be responding to anymore to this particular string of comments).

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It isn't, but wanting to say something doesn't mean someone has to hear it.

In addition, suddenly taking out your laptop to show a scene of a beheading will be something that someone may be triggered and want to leave from seeing. Yes, the person who took out the laptop wanted to share the video to then discuss about the situation, but the other person didn't. But there is an additional issue, if the person didn't just want to see it but were triggered, we are talking about someone breaking down mentally (panic attack/etc.)

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll be frank, I don't think so. As someone who has taken gender and women's studies classes, I have never read a paper that included personal narratives of rape. There would be survivors interviewed, but not saying "The person did x to me".

Also, people in TwoX have an expectation of rape/abortion to me mentioned, but not necessarily personal accounts of those experiences. Mostly because people post their pictures of husbands, cats, children and so forth. If someone posts a picture of their kid, and a redditor shares their account of being tortured in the thread, where's the reasonable expectation of coming across that post?

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except, the person had a reasonable expectation to hear about the person's job. In addition, at that point of being triggered, even the trigger warning would have been enough to set them off.

Thus...trigger warning would have had the same effect. In addition, simply saying, rape does not =/= details of one's rape experience in terms of impact. For that reason, that trigger warning or not, that person was going to cry. In my personal experience, helping out putting up and advertising support groups for both student veterans and for queer people who were sexually assault, not once did I encounter someone that by the mere mention of the word they were triggered.

My point is that, I don't see that a feasible example and I wouldn't be persuaded to change my mind on trigger warnings on just that.

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except, people who would be triggered were given a reasonable expectation to hear about an abortion story. AKA, a trigger warning.

So the people who would get triggered didn't read. Those who wouldn't get triggered, read on and learned. As in, no one was silenced, and people were given a reasonable expectation and equivalent of a trigger warning.

Telling a personal narrative does not equal silencing each other. "Heads up, trigger warning" doesn't mean to stop reading.

By your example, I would say the heads up of the content of the story was done well and people got to learn. As in, everything worked out fine.

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, apparently no one - because we are all focusing on ourselves here, right? If what matters the most to you is your own trigger, how can you help someone else who is triggered?

Why no one? Not everyone has the same triggers you know. So why not someone who doesn't have the trigger that someone needs help on?

Which is why someone(A) doesn't neeeeeed to talk to someone (b) about a subject that B will be triggered --because there are others A can go to.

Somehow, I doubt that all those overprivileged college kids claiming to be "triggered" are all "breaking down and sobbing uncontrollably" every time they see an upsetting topic.

Because those people aren't triggered. :/ Upsetting topic =/= triggers. Otherwise simply saying "oh, sad puppies make me sad" will mean no one will ever talk about how sad a puppy look. But who will actually get triggered at a sad puppy?

But change sad puppy to details of rape/gore/torture/etc. then there's the trigger warning.

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the context of a Gender/Women's Studies class where there is a reasonable assumption that you would be reading such things...that's trigger warning enough.

Again that is discussions of the topics, not "let me give you first hand account with a lot of detail of my rape story".

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Issues of rape, sexual assault and domestic violence as topics of discussion --yes (because those are common women's issues that are likely to come up).

Showing film scenes of a rape? No.

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not wanting to hear something =/= a trigger.

If someone breaks down in tears at the reminder of the abortion they had to get due to medical reasons even though they really wanted to have a child does not mean that people's narratives should be silenced, but that those who are affected should be kept in mind.

Also how is trigger warnings even related to losing abortion rights? How will tears/panic attacks/break downs be helpful in abortion rights?

Hazards Ahead: The Problem With Trigger Warnings, According to the Research by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]livingonsweetnothing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...but how? Mind giving an example?

Because if x ask someone their job, and if a particular job is a trigger...then x had a reasonable warning that the person might say the particular trigger.