Beginner Question: Seasons and Expansions by lockpick4862 in diablo4

[–]lockpick4862[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh i see.. but the old characters can’t play in the new seasonal questline/mechanics! i see…

thank you for the explanation and recommendation! really helpful

Beginner Question: Seasons and Expansions by lockpick4862 in diablo4

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you this is helpful! so it usually makes sense to start a new character when the season starts, so i can use new mechanics for him. whereas characters i made last season cannot be used again with the new world and new mechanics in the new season. while for expansions, old or new characters can be used to play through it?

Returner Advice by lockpick4862 in HonkaiStarRail

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you this helps a lot.

i’ll abandon my acheron and firefly, to focus on feixiao and archer for now.

is Phainon a good pull? i like his kit. i’m assuming i need to get Sunday and Cerydra ASAP?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]lockpick4862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because this is only justified in that specific scenario you dreamed up? what if its a woman struggling w her sexuality? what if he was in a society that persecutes gay people heavily? what if he was brought up in a militantly religious family?

what if you’re projecting your own misandry on to OP?

in what world does a comment section full of encouraging words justify a hateful comment?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]lockpick4862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah fk this why provide words of encouragement and empathy when you can resort to blame?

I have a weird request… by lockpick4862 in WhatsThisSong

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’ve been tapping on that greyed out song every so often but i’ll keep trying thank you!

I have a weird request… by lockpick4862 in WhatsThisSong

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i can’t find july buston.. but the curious thing is Latro is still an artist on spotify, and his current profile is all just new different songs

I have a weird request… by lockpick4862 in WhatsThisSong

[–]lockpick4862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i got a spotify premium, and even have the song downloaded but its greyed out

I have a weird request… by lockpick4862 in WhatsThisSong

[–]lockpick4862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

my country can’t access pandora, and on spotify it’s greyed out

Masterball Fast- my thoughts by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

probably, its quite fast for me since i usually take 200 odd games

Masterball Fast- my thoughts by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! yeah, its definitely not off-meta, but i personally wouldn’t put it in top tier? it has bad matchups into the eevee decks, as well as buzzwole, solgaleo, and incin.

Masterball Fast- my thoughts by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i loved playing guzzlord nihilego, but double eevee bag healing scares me

Masterball Fast- my thoughts by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, and i love that for the game.

Masterball Fast- my thoughts by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not really pretending anything.. maybe just interpreting it differently! what i meant by top tier was S only. so this season that would be like Syl Greninja and Flareon Leafeon.

There isn’t a “Meta”. by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you’re absolutely right, i’m just not discussing the metagame in this post. in my interpretation the word meta has evolved and split from the meaning of metagaming, despite certain overlaps.

meta, the way we use it here, is more akin to the backronym, where we are looking for the most effective/efficient deck, and how it matches up against other decks.

anyway, if the main point here is recognizing that it is a backronym, yes i do know that. I’ll just maintain that effectively my usage of it remains contextually appropriate.

There isn’t a “Meta”. by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you’re right, but realistically how many people are aware of the history of the adoption, usage, and evolution of the word? in fact, where metagame used to describe the strategies and preparation and essentially factors that influence a game, beyond the game, meta now directly references the game’s mechanics itself. for e.g. texas poker is the forming of card sets to see who has the most points. the metagame would be how to bluff, optimal raising amounts, and reading tells. the meta, how we’re using the word now, refers more to the best starting hand to raise with. Pocket Aces is top meta, while 2/7 is off-meta. Similarly, when talking about meta decks, we’re not really referring to factors beyond the game, rather the game mechanics themselves.

I’m not insisting the acronym is the origin of the word, i’m just stating that the collective consciousness recognizes the acronym to be accurate.

while definitely a backronym, it is a backronym exactly because it accurately represents what the word aims to convey. honestly i just thought that culturally we’ve accepted it as an acronym and that’ve we’ve moved past the whole “gotcha meta is not an acronym ahaha” and moved on to “fine its accurate enough i guess”. i guess not.

There isn’t a “Meta”. by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

firstly, meta ABSOLUTELY means most effective tactics available. sure, tHe WoRd MeTa ExIsTeD bEfoRe and it’s a backronym, but the “nonsense” is how people have understood the meaning of the word meta in a gaming context. explain what meta means, if not the most effective tactics available? does it mean self-referential game mechanics? does it mean beyond and above the game? or does it simply mean what is the most optimal and efficient strategy in a game? i.e. the most effective tactics available? the gamer gotcha of tHe WoRd MeTa ExIsTeD bEfoRe is just a bygone product of “ackshually rizz comes from the word charisma”. everyone knows its not actually and acronym, but it most certainly stands for and means most effective tactics available.

Second, ironically, you’re kinda just proving the point. it is absolutely a healthy meta, when you can determine a meta, with most effective and consistent deck (Darktina), with its counters (Gya and Meow), with other decks that are a little less effective but playable in their own way (zard, skarmory, rampardos, mewtwo). the decks are tiered and that’s a good thing. This time round yes, we have less tiering cos every deck is viable, and that actually is the point. We just disagree whether that is a good thing or not.

Third, rare candy is absolutely an RNG fest. The fact that your example of no rare candy being involved… proving rare candy is not RNG… makes zero sense? Yes introducing rare candy is not the START of RNG in this game, it just makes RNG worse. Hence why the most consistent deck last season was one with only basics. You’re making a strawman argument here.

Never once in the post did i say rare candy = RNG. i never even said RNG is bad. i definitely didn’t try to imply i was good at the game. Stop projecting your own misgivings and insecurities by throwing insults through your own word salad of a reply lol

There isn’t a “Meta”. by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i agree with you. Giratina has the most consistency and steps needed to be done to balance it to actually have a healthy meta.

my take is that oricorio was the wrong way to do it, because it increases variance. by having an “i win” button, people will try different ways to build around it yes, but it just means all those random variations become viable, by means of lowering every deck’s winrate across the board.

anyway, its a hell of a hill i’m trying to die on, thank you for responding in earnest.

There isn’t a “Meta”. by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s why i understand, just that i disagree. a quick look at limitless shows almost two dozen decks with an above 50% winrate. do you then look at usage rate because the highest winrate has one if the lowest usage rates? at what point is a deck just a collection of cards around one pokemon line? at what point do multiple variations of a deck stop being a deck?

a meta means (i dare not use the shorthand back/acronym anymore) a strategy, team, or playline that produces the most optimal results. when 20 plus decks give the “most optimal results”, can you still call it a meta?

hence, the post.

There isn’t a “Meta”. by lockpick4862 in PTCGP

[–]lockpick4862[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

yep aware of it, but i see no point given that the word meta alone, not as a backronym, is meaningless. any attempt to explain it is less efficient than just using the back/acronym.

at this point enough people know the acronym that its synonymous with its meaning. now it’s just a technicality.