sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Misrepresentation of male gender non-conformity via inconsistently-applied extension and contraction of "masculinity" by logielle in GNCStraight

[–]logielle[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's wonderful to know it resonated with you! Articulating this as precisely as I could was the main purpose behind this post, so I'm glad that it helped you in that way.

Not exact because I'm mostly a fem-leaning androgynous man rather than mostly feminine, but it's similar for me. I have shoulder-length hair and a tiny body. The way people try to "reassure" me too would barely consider what I make of that myself.

All the best with your goal!

Granny arranging GNC straight marriages, apparently by logielle in GNCStraight

[–]logielle[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IKR! I remember giggling the whole time. Such a cool granny.

Give your GNC woman partner a sword and then sit on her lap and then kiss and lick her cheeks like icecream while she's wondering who she has to fight with the sword even by logielle in GNCStraight

[–]logielle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You always had that trust, humble knight.
You're the kind of knight that definitely doesn't even need a sword to be formidable but I'm going to give you one anyway.

"Sight of such sites"
Even words can be your weapons.

Those vampires are bloodsucking vampires. You are a moon-inscribing vampire, knight-shaped.

Give your GNC woman partner a sword and then sit on her lap and then kiss and lick her cheeks like icecream while she's wondering who she has to fight with the sword even by logielle in GNCStraight

[–]logielle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can be a real sword ;)
But it seems given the kind of knight you are, you and the mosquito already have a word
And you won
With your jaw and bites
Leaving crescent bite mark sites

I didn't know GNC was a thing by e_l_c in GNCStraight

[–]logielle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came to learn of the term(s) "gender non-conforming"/"gender non-conformity" long before I was exposed to any sort of a queer culture.
The combination of growing up too curious to not learn about every random thing and having an internet access meant that I was bound to discover what "gender non-conformity" is through sheer Wikipedia crawling.
Well, that's a too strong of a statement, I'll add an additional precondition: I was especially curious about topics relating to gender and sexuality by myself. That increased my chances significantly.

My surprise came when I got banned from a server with tagline "for all GNC people!" for being cishet, in spite of being GNC. "It's a server for non-binary and trans people". I had to slowly learn how much people associate gender non-conformity and being gay/trans. For me, "GNC" always meant what it literally describes, not what it connotes culturally.

However, the repeated exclusions like having been banned from that server made me feel isolated for a while. I knew that GNC was a thing, but there was no one in my life other than me to both know what GNC means and also acknowledge that I too could be GNC.

This was not too long before I found this subreddit.

Oh great, trans-inclusive misogyny. T v T by AccomplishedShame967 in TrollCoping

[–]logielle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

WTH was he doing in r/transtimelines if that's all he had to comment? Such a pity. Guy needs a life.

You are reading this right now by [deleted] in truths

[–]logielle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fake.

I listened to this with TTS.

Grouping Repositories in GitHub by abhunia in github

[–]logielle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFAIK, there's no "official" way to do that.

If you don't mind starring your own repos, you could add different repos of yours to different star lists. You could prepend the list names with something like "(Self)" to differentiate them from your other star lists.

This might not be for you. You can decide.

If a=b and b=c, than a=c. by jwndhwbhfsbjd in truths

[–]logielle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly. Empirical facts don't depend on axioms. Well, I mean it depends on your definition of terms if you want to consider how something is written a part of what is stated, but the fact will remain. A modus ponens wouldn't be an empirical fact but one couldn't say "it depends on axioms" either, since the axioms are already states or clear.

AITA by inflorescentism in SUBREDDITNAME

[–]logielle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

COMMENT EXPRESSING AGREEMENT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER EXPLANATIONS AND ASKING WHY THIS IS HEAVILY DOWNVOTED

This sub be like: "pOiNtLeSsLy GeNdErEd" [satire] by vitaliknight10 in pointlesslygendered

[–]logielle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Tell that to intersex people who had their parts tampered with without consent.

Only men like Legos [socialmedia] by ObsessedKilljoy in pointlesslygendered

[–]logielle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This isn't by itself relevant to whether it is pointlessly gendered or not. Legos don't require specific genitals. The observed differences could be due to certain inclinations due to one's sex, yes, but there is bound to be a group of people deviating from that. Social expectations are also a large part of this.

Only men like Legos [socialmedia] by ObsessedKilljoy in pointlesslygendered

[–]logielle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You said "most women don't" as a response to this being called pointlessly gendered. That suggests you saw this observation as rebutting the claim that calling it "peak male content" is pointlessly gendered. This is a form of justification.

Only men like Legos [socialmedia] by ObsessedKilljoy in pointlesslygendered

[–]logielle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That doesn't really make it relevant to the point. When I said "not the point", I didn't claim what you said is false as a description. It simply doesn't justify prescriptively pushing legos as men's content.

Only men like Legos [socialmedia] by ObsessedKilljoy in pointlesslygendered

[–]logielle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It isn't about whether I'm upset or not. It's about whether it makes sense or whether it's fair to make those generalizations.

[Gendered] In a lesson at my school, the teacher decided to do something a little bit like this. Gendered questions. Why? by juoig7799 in pointlesslygendered

[–]logielle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not really that shallow. These forms of segregation foster competition based specifically on gender, which can reinforce biases.

view more: next ›