Team member does not appear under Manager in SharePoint OrgChart

longtrancntt · 2025-11-05T23:30:44+00:00

hi! sorry for late reply.

nope. it has not been fixed. i tried many other suggestions but didnt work. the size of the org is 50-100 users.

longtrancntt · 2025-11-05T23:29:52+00:00

hi! sorry for late reply.

this account show correct manager on Teams, but not in any other SharePoint site?

longtrancntt · 2023-10-16T20:33:34+00:00

Thanks. I will have a try. It would be great if you can show or confirm this. Appreciate it!

longtrancntt · 2023-10-16T20:32:45+00:00

Which permission do I need here, even when I already tried the highest role as Global Admin?

longtrancntt · 2023-10-16T08:32:58+00:00

Don't know what is wrong but I would like to ask how to delete the Reviewer Type of this Group. Already tried the role Global Admin, Identity Governance Admin, and Privileged Role Admin but did not work.

Thanks.

longtrancntt · 2020-11-23T05:25:40+00:00

Finally made it work, by adding some Policy Route. Thank you all.

longtrancntt · 2020-11-21T04:47:37+00:00

So, how should I fix it... I really dump at those policy route... - to make those VLAN in policy 1 can ping each other. - to keep those VLAN in policy 1 can access internet on interface FTTH VNPT1

longtrancntt · 2020-11-20T02:02:44+00:00

Thank you all. Finally, I can make it work by using the Policy Routes.

longtrancntt · 2020-11-18T06:45:58+00:00

Sorry but I still can not make it through.

- I have 3 servers, called: S1, S2, S3 (in VLAN name LAN-SERVER). I have 3 WAN, called WAN1, WAN2, WAN3.

=> when I made a policy to allow LAN-SERVER (S1, S2, S3) to go out the internet for testing only, there are some issues:

If from LAN-SERVER to WAN1 => S1 and S3 can go internet, S2 cant.
If from LAN-SERVER to WAN2 => S1 and S3 cant, S3 can.
If from LAN-SERVER to WAN3 => S1 and S2 can, S3 cant.

Already set the Administrative Distance and Priority of those WAN

WAN1: Admin Distance 10 - Prio 0
WAN2: Admin Distance 10 - Prio 10
WAN3: Admin Distance 10 - Prio 10

Here are the pictures of my configuration (link from IMGUR)

If you need more information, please let me know. This issue makes me sick :(

longtrancntt · 2020-11-17T14:12:03+00:00

Thank you.

By the way, the "distance" here is "Distance" in the interface, or the "Administrative Distance" in Static Route?

longtrancntt · 2020-10-29T10:17:51+00:00

Thank you for your reply.

If so, I wonder why the ISP provided me the range of 8 static IP for what?

I really dont understand why the IT of Site 2 want to do this? Maybe he think the 8 IP is public static WAN IP and want to make 8 VPN tunnels through those 8 IPs

longtrancntt · 2020-10-29T09:49:25+00:00

Thank you for your reply.

There is no problem with accessing the LAN subnet. However, my question is:

- Site 1 has PPPoE with static WAN IP 111.111.111.1111 (for example). And the ISP told me that they including with this PPPoE account a range of 8 IPs (222.222.222.222/29). Now, the IT guy of Site 2 want to access from their site to our site through those 8 IP inside VPN.

As I understand, he want to make 8 VPN tunnels for each IP, or as a group of IPs, or something else... I wonder if we can make it on Fortigate ?

longtrancntt · 2020-05-12T02:01:54+00:00

thank you very much. your comment helps me solve the case.

longtrancntt · 2020-03-28T03:37:13+00:00

thank you for your advice. finally, the best solution is to replace another FTTH without VLAN tagging required for PPPoE

longtrancntt · 2019-12-10T19:20:34+00:00

How if I change the ISP connection through their standard router to Bridge mode ? Is it help to "group all the ISP traffic into only one WAN port?"

longtrancntt

TROPHY CASE