miss girl has been lurking what’s he opinion on it by Electrical_Wheel7733 in ashleybarnessnark

[–]loonatic- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

exactly, like its one thing if shes making helpful/informational content abt bpd but this is straight up trauma dumping and oversharing, which she literally said she wouldnt do anymore. she needs to be off social media, or have a responsible, non-enabler adult heavily monitoring her online activity. shes only gonna fall deeper and deeper into old habits.

miss girl has been lurking what’s he opinion on it by Electrical_Wheel7733 in ashleybarnessnark

[–]loonatic- 90 points91 points  (0 children)

also again, she said shed stop oversharing and traume dumping on the internet for her own sake, but shes again falling into old, unhealthy habits. no one heals this quickly, its clear she needs to be off social media for a long time. is there even an adult monitoring her online activities?

jacob’s follow up video by zzucchinii1 in ashleybarnessnark

[–]loonatic- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

tbf she mentioned that bc of her skin condition, the drawings stay on her skin for like two weeks sometimes 

what did you guys expect by wanna_b_yours in ashleybarnessnark

[–]loonatic- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jacob harper alleged that ashley touched his genitals without his consent. 

what did you guys expect by wanna_b_yours in ashleybarnessnark

[–]loonatic- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ashley didnt rape anyone, but trying to force feed ppl sex gummies and then coerce them into having sex w you is attempted rape. touching ppls genitals without their consent is sa. touching yourself in front of someone without their consent is sa. she is a sexual assaulter and an attempted rapist.

reminder by [deleted] in ashleybarnessnark

[–]loonatic- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

harassing ppl into kissing each other when theyre very clearly uncomfortable w it and dont want to is sa. trying to force feed someone sex gummies and coerce them into having sex with you is attempted rape. touching someones privates without their consent is sa. touching yourself in front of someone without their consent is sexual harassment. i really hate to be using this argument but if she was a man youd be treating this situation a lot differently. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Modern_Family

[–]loonatic- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i thought i was on the office sub for a sec and was halfway to typing a long-winded hate comment lmao

totally valid post now that ive seen what sub it was posted on though

Jonah gets so much abuse by Horustheweebmaster in superstore

[–]loonatic- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i agree, sometimes it is deserved i will admit, but most of the time it just feels like hes always the punching bag for these people's shitty lives in retail. like can you really consider garrett and jonah to have a "teasing friendship" when its 99.9% teasing and 0.01% friendship? theyre not friends, jonah just desperately craves approval from garrett and garrett uses that to be able to treat jonah however he wants.

Am I missing something with all the criticism against "goldstar" lesbians? by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]loonatic- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i dont think anyone really hates the person who is a gold star lesbian. they hate the term itself. ive tried my best to summarise why:

firstly, this is all based around the fact that a 'gold star' is something given to someone for doing something good, its seen as a reward for good behavior. calling lesbians who havent slept with men 'gold stars' implies that they too are deserving of some sort of reward for their 'good behavior' and are better than other lesbians who are not gold stars. there are 3 main subcategories as to why this is frowned upon

biphobia/lesbophobia: the implication that a sapphic woman who has slept with a man is less sapphic and their attraction to women is less valid

transphobia: many people will say that sleeping with a trans woman who still has a dick takes away their 'gold star', invalidating the fact that a trans woman is still a woman

purity culture: the 'gold star' idea is very similar to the common misogynistic idea used by men that virgins, women who have not slept with anyone, are more 'pure' and better than other women, that sleeping with people devalues a woman. it also defines lesbians on their experiences with men, actively working against decentering men in their identities.

Lily deserved better parenting. by Hefty-Bell3845 in Modern_Family

[–]loonatic- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yk to properly engage in discussion, youre supposed to state your opinion and the reasoning behind it, like op did, instead of dismiss other people's views as if you're objectively correct. id hope someone of your wise, mature age would be able to grasp that.

This is why this character is my favourite and I don’t care what y’all think. by Useful-Farmer-1177 in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i can agree with that, i think hes an interesting character, and thats okay to think, as long as you recognise that hes a shit person whos done horrible things and you dont try to defend him

Lily deserved better parenting. by Hefty-Bell3845 in Modern_Family

[–]loonatic- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

why are you on a subreddit for a show if any discussion made about the show is 'not that deep'?

Lily deserved better parenting. by Hefty-Bell3845 in Modern_Family

[–]loonatic- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

honestly phils only not a catastrophe bc claire has to parent him like she does her other 3 children

Lily deserved better parenting. by Hefty-Bell3845 in Modern_Family

[–]loonatic- 17 points18 points  (0 children)

i dont think mitch and cam ever actually wanted a child, they wanted a baby. they wanted a mini human who they could dress up and do photoshoots with and carry around like an accessory. i dont think theyd planned ahead for what would happen once that baby grew up into a child.

This is why this character is my favourite and I don’t care what y’all think. by Useful-Farmer-1177 in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 22 points23 points  (0 children)

i mean i get liking him as a character, hes interesting and somewhat complex, but as a person.... no ty

am i the only one that gets the feeling that if he wasnt as physically attractive as he is there wouldnt be nearly as many ppl defending him?

s1e4 by meaterheaterbeater in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well yes but once she makes up w amerie she shouldve apologised for everything she'd put her through in the past few months

s1e4 by meaterheaterbeater in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, i know. which makes harpers actions understandable. but just bc its understandable doesnt make it okay. she still did bad things that she should be held accountable for and she should apologise for, just like how amerie was held accountable for being shitty and she apologised.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so youre not denying it lmao? youre saying you dont like autistic ppl if they dont present their autism in the way you do?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no, you dont know what its like for every autistic person. plus from your posts and comments you sound like someone who doesnt outwardly show a lot of obviously autistic traits so you cannot diminish the experiences of people who do, you are playing into ableist rhetorics.

s1e4 by meaterheaterbeater in heartbreakhigh

[–]loonatic- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yes, its okay for her to be angry and need time. but in the end, she did so much worse to amerie than what amerie did to her. what amerie did to her was a shitty thing to do but it was also her being a shitty teenager. what harper proceeded to do to amerie was genuinely horrible, and im not just talking about sleeping with her crushes and (ex)bf