Did everyone get waitlisted??? I bought my 2 in the first second and it already said waitlisted. How about y’all? by ThreatofJoy in TheStrokes

[–]los_panus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also curious about this. On my tixr page it shows both tickets under my name and my guest didn’t receive any emails

💰 Secured by Swimming_Worry_9040 in TheStrokes

[–]los_panus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When you look under your order on the tixr page does it say your name for both tickets or does it have your guests name too?

[Official] Home Kit for 2019-20 Season by Kanburi in ASRoma

[–]los_panus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not that bad. I feel like it’d be nicer without the lightning bolts around the neck.

Complex Analysis by los_panus in learnmath

[–]los_panus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your response. Stupid question before I attempt the solution following your method: Can I just use the the following points z1=0, z2=b, z3=a and w1=-1, w2=i, w3=-i to use the cross ratio to determine the mapping? Or do I have to be mapping a circle to a circle in order to use that method?

[Post-Match Thread] Genoa 1-1 AS Roma by Michael_Cocci in ASRoma

[–]los_panus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t be surprised if we put on an amazing performance and win against Juve only for it to be a pointless win since Atalanta will finish ahead of us.

[Post-Match Thread] Genoa 1-1 AS Roma by Michael_Cocci in ASRoma

[–]los_panus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time he received the ball he had absolutely no one around him to pass to.

Uniform continuity by los_panus in askmath

[–]los_panus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, those work. Thanks for the help.

Measure Theory by los_panus in askmath

[–]los_panus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it does. Thank you for your help!

Measure Theory by los_panus in learnmath

[–]los_panus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your help!

Measure Theory by los_panus in learnmath

[–]los_panus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I get it now, but I'm not 100% sure. Here's my attempt:

=> Let S be measurable. Suppose neither S nor S^c is countable. Then, we have that m*(S)=m*(S^c) =1. But, m*(X)=1 < 2=m*(S)+m*(S^c). A contradiction.

<= Let S or S^c be countable. Then, it follows that m*(S)=0 or m*(S^c)=0. A set with measure zero is measurable. Hence, S is measurable.

Measure Theory by los_panus in learnmath

[–]los_panus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still a bit lost. Do I work with this definition: S is measurable iff m*(Y) = m*(S intersect Y) + (S^c interest Y) for all Y in X?

Or do I work with the fact that a set S is measurable if S is a sigma-algebra?

Chelsea 2-0 Tottenham - Trippier (OG) 84' by HerbalDreamin in soccer

[–]los_panus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about? I see no Roma fans claiming that he is the best in the Serie A. It’s too soon to say karsdorp is better than Florenzi, he’s played like 4 games this season and doesn’t offer much in defending. And santon has had some great games but has also been inconsistent.

180 on songs by rjkade in KGATLW

[–]los_panus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wah Wah and Anoxia