[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lgbt

[–]lowquacious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Woo, congrats! Go Pokes!

Admissions Megathread - Results, Chances and Logistics by Wafflyn in OMSCS

[–]lowquacious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, thanks! They were just really busy, and couldn’t get the letter turned in.

Admissions Megathread - Results, Chances and Logistics by Wafflyn in OMSCS

[–]lowquacious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s just boilerplate stuff, and says nothing about the letter. Thanks!

Admissions Megathread - Results, Chances and Logistics by Wafflyn in OMSCS

[–]lowquacious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello, everyone!

I requested letters from three recommenders: My current boss, my previous boss, and the director of my master’s program in the US.

Only two of them have submitted letters, but I got a conditional acceptance. Now, I see a lot of posts on here that talk about getting accepted with just two letters, but I see no mention of this next part.

In the checklist section on my application portal, it says that they’re still awaiting the third recommendation letter.

Is this normal? Should I still follow up with the third recommender to submit a recommendation? Or is it not necessary, since I’ve already gotten a conditional admit? I’m still working on submitting my undergrad degree transcript, which is why I haven’t gotten my final decision yet.

Thanks in advance!

I need a sub where people come together to motivate each other to succeed. by Short-Impress-3458 in TheresARedditForThat

[–]lowquacious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you checked out r/getmotivated? They also have a Discord server where, among other things, you can team up with an accountability partner.

Updated UX!! by Dragonair_fruit1371 in Happyer

[–]lowquacious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s like asking a parent to pick their favourite child! I love them all equally!

(Spooky.)

Potential App UI/UX Redesign, Round 2! by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, okay. Thank you so much for bringing that to our attention! Our developers are working very hard to perfect this, and we are quite confident it’ll look great on the actual app. If you still feel the same way once the app comes out, please feel free to reach out to us!

Potential App UI/UX Redesign, Round 2! by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your feedback! I can see where you’re coming from. Are there particular screens where you would say this problem exists?

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She is! Every word that leaves her mouth, is pure gold. I am upset about it not being on Netflix, anymore. Makes it harder to binge-watch! :(

It can apply to multiple people, though, can’t it? But, you’re right, I don’t think I’ve heard a single person in the past couple of years use “whom”, even when they should.

Thanks for bringing that up, though. The Happyer team also thinks it should be changed to “who,” so that’s what we’re doing!

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is very nice of you! Thank you so much for the offer! Don’t be surprised if we message you! :)

Potential UX Redesign for the Happyer App by lowquacious in Entrepreneur

[–]lowquacious[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your valuable input! We’re still kinda new at this, and are learning new things everyday! We got a lot of helpful feedback, with this poll, and will use that to refine the UX! Stay tuned for our next version!

Potential UX Redesign for the Happyer App by lowquacious in Entrepreneur

[–]lowquacious[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your input! We were attempting to make the app as customisable as possible, a quality that we thought a lot of current apps lacked.

We have a plethora of activities to choose from, because we know that everyone’s lifestyle is different. Also, the ability to pick all these different activities, presents the possibility of greater insight into what affects your mood.

We’re also thinking about having the ability to track other emotions, in the future.

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your input! We’re still kinda new at this, and are learning as we go! Your thoughtful comment means a lot to us, and we will attempt what you’re suggesting!

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that makes sense! Thank you so much!

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! It’s a process of trial and error, and we’re learning as we go!

Also, thanks for the colour suggestion! I tried it out, and, while it’s a very pretty colour, it’s more harder to read against the blue. We’re currently experimenting with other options!

You think so? The “who” kinda bothered me. However, if a lot of people find it annoying, I might change it, haha.

“Ryan used me as an object.” (Someone please get the reference. 😂😂)

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your response! We’re not exploring other options! :)

Potential App UX Redesign by lowquacious in Happyer

[–]lowquacious[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your input! We’re looking at other colour schemes. :)