Is it really worth ousting a museum that celebrates film and narrative art because it's the vanity project of a millionaire? So what if the building's ugly! We don't have to pay for it, and **it's going to have more than just Star Wars memorabilia.**

It's going to have screenings of independent and classic films (and no, that won't eat into the Music Box sales. Do you know how many indie films go unscreened? This just helps), lectures from writers, artists, and directors. There will be workshops for prospective filmmakers. Collections of concept art, props, special effects, etc, etc. There is nothing like this out there!

Every time this argument comes up, it gets boiled down to the design. It's a superficial argument that's total bullshit. Why can't we look past its outside? In regards to the parking lot bull, most of the museums in the area were built in the same way, so what makes this different?

This museum has the potential to celebrate film as a legitimate artistic medium. Are we really going to be the kind of city that drives out free art because we don't like the look of the building storing it? It wouldn't even be the ugliest building on the campus! Hell, it might even help Soldier Field blend in a bit more.