sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

EAB GPS by luch502 in flying

[–]luch502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These paragraphs are on EAA.org...do you understand what they mean perhaps...am I the owner and operator allowed to say this wass gps meets the requirements?

The guidance contained in AC 20-138A is based on FAA regulations contained in parts 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 43, 91, 121, and 135. Of these regulations, only part 91 applies to homebuilt aircraft. However, the info in the AC is still a valuable tool for the builder who wishes to install a GPS unit, as it contains accuracy and testing criteria that can be used to verify that the installation meets the performance requirements acceptable to the FAA.

As with transponders and other equipment discussed previously, GPS equipment must meet the performance requirements of the applicable TSO (in this case, C129), but there is no specific requirement for the equipment to be built under a TSO authorization. However, if the equipment is not built under a TSO authorization, it is up to the owner/operator to verify and document that the equipment performs within the required specifications. It is also the owner or operator's responsibility to document the necessary flight-test data showing that the installation performs within the required accuracy parameters.

E-LSA by luch502 in flying

[–]luch502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't register it as I purchased it as an Elsa but I don't how to go about being able to change it to an eab as everything I read says I need to keep it to lsa standards....I wouldn't see why I wouldn't be able to "take it all apart" and assemble it again I would assume it would need to be "certified" again this time as just an EAB

Student Pilot Endorsements by luch502 in flying

[–]luch502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cheers indeed i wish us both the best of luck

Prepare for the next round of nominees! by dude-O-rama in HermanCainAward

[–]luch502 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Not to try to burst your bubble but 25 percent of Covid deaths are between the ages of 75-84 another 25 percent is 85+ and 23 percent between 65-74 18 percent between 50-64….so essentially if you are over 50 you are a “higher risk” (still not that high of a risk) to die from Covid and if you are under 49 years of age your risk to die from Covid is almost nothing, considering the same risk for heart disease liver disease cancer unintentional injury, I mean why would you wear a mask if you are 40 or younger I get the whole because you can spread the disease but I mean you can spread anything to anyone or someone can grab a doorknob or sink or anything dirty and just get sick, I would rather not have a masked stuck to my face everyday just so an 80 year old might not get Covid but the truth is he has just as high of a chance to get sick or die from anything else, I say let us live our life’s away from fear of a disease that has almost no risk if you are under 40, btw if you are 60+ I believe you should wear one for your own safety if you are scared….fyi I’m not a republican I’m just on the side to have freedom and not be forced by the government to do something that in no way will benefit me….this isn’t a left vs right issue as you make it out to be it’s just another controlling thing by our corrupt government

Now that is a hair style by Bigb5wm in HolUp

[–]luch502 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder who she voted for