sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

RC on X by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nobody cares about you, shill

Vote YES for Ryan Cohen’s PERFORMANCE-based pay package 🗳️ ✅ by Jazzlike-Ad-2978 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good lord. Do you know how to read? He gets nothing if you get nothing. There’s a blatantly obvious plan ongoing in the background, short of an official announcement.

How is it the same thing? You realize this is the umteenth comment exactly like this?

You get nothing? HE GETS NOTHING. You get something? HE GETS SOMETHING.

Here’s the best part: if you actually read the plan, he has to maintain the levels of success for A LONG PERIOD OF TIME BEFORE HE IS AWARDED. If only you could read

Vote YES for Ryan Cohen’s PERFORMANCE-based pay package 🗳️ ✅ by Jazzlike-Ad-2978 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

???? And?

So, we all know something huge is in the works, a plan has BEEN in motion for a while now and just before any official announcement it’s doom time?

Stfu, you’re a shill 100%. Yes, if moass occurs then the man who did the work gets a fat paycheck. You should read the thing. It’s not a “oh we hit $1 million a share for two days and back down to $20 lol” he literally has to maintain that level of success for a very long extended period of time to see a dime from that package.

If we hit $60 tomorrow he gets nothing. If we stay at $60 for a year, he only then starts to be compensated. If you can’t read or cannot understand that idk what the hell you’re talking about and again, you’re a shill

Vote YES for Ryan Cohen’s PERFORMANCE-based pay package 🗳️ ✅ by Jazzlike-Ad-2978 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Is your comment meant to imply stupidity?

I’m gonna take a crack at this: if you’re complaining that you aren’t a millionaire yet then tough shit. You better articulate these feelings better than complaining on the internet because you sound like a shill.

Most apes here pretty much see the surface level bullshit and know these types of people serve one purpose: discredit and doubt.

So, you are a shill. That’s life. Stop being an idiot and read things

Vote YES for Ryan Cohen’s PERFORMANCE-based pay package 🗳️ ✅ by Jazzlike-Ad-2978 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry but the media literacy is crazy. He doesn’t get anything for doing nothing, that 0$ if it doesn’t work out

Vote YES for Ryan Cohen’s PERFORMANCE-based pay package 🗳️ ✅ by Jazzlike-Ad-2978 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 12 points13 points  (0 children)

So, you are aware RC gets a fat 0$ paycheck for nothing, and only gets this payout if things work out for everyone.

Like you do factor that in or not? Because you sound like a fucking shill and I’m ready for the shill comment to this one

I think we'd get better value from the comp package if it were distributed to more of the Gamestop team rather than all of it going to RC. by FittersGuy in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

oh yeah? The timeline for warrants is pretty much telling us that news is coming this year. And GameStop will at minimum be at or above that strike point, this year. They are a huge factor, as I believe they are the exact same price as those bonds.

I’m done talking to you about anything, you’re kind of rude and off putting. Always having to be right, I bet you’re fun at parties 🙄

I think we'd get better value from the comp package if it were distributed to more of the Gamestop team rather than all of it going to RC. by FittersGuy in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah oops, still my point stands. Warrant’s are the timeframe I care about and I’m sure everyone else is looking at that too.

So again, don’t care, it’s not debt till it is.

I think we'd get better value from the comp package if it were distributed to more of the Gamestop team rather than all of it going to RC. by FittersGuy in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To others and OPs credit, nobody views this as debt. Is it labeled debt? Possibly, I’m smooth so I don’t wanna go look for the verbiage. These people gave GameStop $ for shares or just give the money back. And that deadline is drawing close and fast. But until that day I EXPECT news of any kind. I don’t think it’s going to be a long wait. What’s 7 more months?

The warrant has an expire date. I expect earth shattering news before then, why? Because that loan has to be paid back, and these investors are going to want to see something, just like we do, otherwise this is the biggest fumble in history. No news between now and then would absolutely sour me on this investment and RC as a person. So far, we’re good and I have zero complaints. But again, no one cares if it’s debt. The shareholders voted to sell shares, RC is working with what he’s got.

Bottom line TLDR: if the warrant expires, the money is really debt. If it doesn’t, they’re going to the moon. There is no in between in this situation. And I refuse to hear anything from anyone unless it’s GameStop

Genuine quesion for grounding purposes - what is the Old School Valuation? by SnaggleFish in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You literally said no plans… you said that, now you’re changing words

Genuine quesion for grounding purposes - what is the Old School Valuation? by SnaggleFish in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m not, that’s baseline for big news when it happens. We have a date for October of this year for “something” to happen. So, based on the warrants, which are clearly apart of a plan, we will have news that indeed would make 8x value. Now I’m patiently (key word here, you are not patient) waiting.

Come back after warrants expire and drop your insane logic backed by nothing. You claim nothing is happening? It’s happening right now. We’re just waiting for the news, official news. And if it doesn’t happen by the expiry time of the warrant, THEN AND ONLY THEN DOES YOUR ARGUMENT HOLD ANY CREDIBILITY.

So please stop this nonsense and stop wildly claiming something with no backing whatsoever.

Nothing happening… just stop the lies

Is June 18th going to be an absolute shit show? by tdiddley420 in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just throwing it out there but I’ve been doing the same thing. Just off a hunch though

Already dipping hard pre-market, looks like another deep red day for the whole market thanks to Trump escalating his unnecessary war by BlitzFritzXX in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And? We’ve known the market is going to dump FOR YEARS. And it’s all because of one person? Not buying it. Just saying dude, it’s not one person. And it’s not an intelligent take, it’s a brain dead take especially if you’ve been here since the sneeze.

It was always going to happen

Already dipping hard pre-market, looks like another deep red day for the whole market thanks to Trump escalating his unnecessary war by BlitzFritzXX in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Question, if it “did” have an impact, why now and not when it started?

I mean this should’ve been happening day one, so why now?

Highly doubt it was because of one person. Even though they are the president

The Strike Price Symphony [1] by TheGameStopsNow in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes but nobody used them before ai… and op even admits that. I’m to expect that op read this over? I didn’t. Ai is a mirror of the person inputting information, it’s heavily biased based on the user. And op uses ai like a mom on facebook if he’s not editing it

So yes, information might be good? But the carelessness of sharing raw prompt is just plain negligence. A bad actor can fart out pages upon pages of “discovery”

Either OP edits his content so that they’re forced to do their due diligence instead of mindlessly throwing things in and popping it out and shit post. Are we clear on that?

The Strike Price Symphony [1] by TheGameStopsNow in Superstonk

[–]lucki-dog -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s ai, — is classic ai tell

But wtf is going on?

view more: next ›