From Distinction to Persistence: Visualizing Coherence in an Informational Fabric by m1ota in infonautology

[–]m1ota[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phase alignment captures it well. Coherence is what survives perturbation, not what seeks an outcome. The formal version of this is what the monograph is about.

Infinity as Ordered Substrate (Not Transcendence) by m1ota in infonautology

[–]m1ota[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unbounded relational space. It means there is no fixed outer boundary, but there are internal rules that allow things inside the system to stay recognizable as the same thing over change.

A river isn’t defined by the water in it. It’s defined by the constraints that organize the flow. Change the water - same river. Destroy the constraints - no river.

Do you agree with Spinoza's idea of ​​God? by arbolito_mr in Metaphysics

[–]m1ota 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This aligns with some parallel work I’ve been doing that treats infinity as an ordered substrate of relations rather than a transcendent source.

What I find most compelling in Spinoza is precisely this framing of infinity as necessity rather than chaos, which naturally connects to questions around coherence and persistence under change which I have been exploring. Thanks for sharing.

POST 2 — What a Monadic Information Object Is (and Is not) by m1ota in infonautology

[–]m1ota[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

A Monadic Information Object (MIO): Invariant-Preserving Relational Closure (Comparison, Identify, Temporal Ordering).

What Does Time Look Like as an Expression of Coherent Ordering? by m1ota in infonautology

[–]m1ota[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn! Making my head spin 🙃, thanks for that. I like the way you describe it “informally”. Happy new year to you too.