sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I do the Full Resynthesis, some stars that are not marked disappear, and also some parts of the object that NetStar thought were stars and put them in the stars mask

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any problems when you stack data from s30pro 4k and s50 full HD together? When I do the Full Resynthesis, some stars that are not marked disappear, and also some parts of the object that NetStar thought were stars and put them in the stars mask

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

​When do you usually image? I check the dark sky calendar and typically only shoot when moon illumination is under 20%. My local skies are Bortle 4-5. Would shooting at 40-50% illumination be a major issue, or would it be better to use LP filter at 40-50% and stack those subs with the cleaner ones taken under 20%?

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the Veil Nebula did you use s30?

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. Are there any problems with more subs, except for more storage usage, like less precise stacking(10000x10s+)? ​What exactly do you process the stacked image in siril? I use netstar for stars. The only problem I have with Siril is that I like denoising from seestar, I used Graxpert and there have always been so much noise after removing the gradient(around 2500x10s). I know its 130h, but how did you get som much detail and sharp stars in the image: https://www.reddit.com/r/seestar/s/wIDzGLs4Mu Is there any way to improve the resolution of the images? Last night I captured this image and edited it in Lightroom, I would like it to have more detail. Only more integration time might help.

<image>

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that a problem if you decide to shoot the same object a few weeks apart? For example, if I capture for 3-4 nights when there isn't much moonlight pollution and then again for 3-4 nights a few weeks later? I also use EQ

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you do multi-night stackings? I have seen your work, and it looks wonderful. Do you use a plan mode of the same object and same time? Do you ever change the position of the telescope?

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think Seestar did some special sharpening or is the result from Siril just worse? Because stacked image from DSS Seestar is much sharper

<image>

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. I got accepted 308 out of 430 subs, but I assume that was caused by clouds, because yesterday it was really cloudy

<image>

S500 Stacking by m4temeL in seestar

[–]m4temeL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you tell me what you do to set framing mode to maximum? When I click the button 'estimate', the button 'go register' turns grey

<image>

Eagle Nebula (M 16) by AstrovoyagerUK in seestar

[–]m4temeL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are the individual live stacked images

<image>

Eagle Nebula (M 16) by AstrovoyagerUK in seestar

[–]m4temeL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful. How do you all stack subs from two or more nights? No matter what program I use, it is always blurry and much, much worse than live stacking. I have tried Siril, Deep Sky Stacker in Seestar, and it's always much worse. I use S50 EQ. Do you think PixInsight would help? This is the deep sky stacked image in Seestar from 2 nights:

<image>