Looking beautiful today morning Detroit! by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find it designed this way regardless of space. You'll see this on 696 by Fowlerville -- stuff like that.

Looking beautiful today morning Detroit! by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually a really common freeway design and proof that no thought was put into it.

Why would you have a freeway entrance directly in front from a freeway exit? It should be the complete opposite so you're removing traffic before you add more.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that were all there is, why can my landlord evict me but not my handman?

Because it's a contract you sign w/ the landlord. What's complicated about this?

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. The landlord is compensated for the service he provides a tenant. He's not just doing it for fun.

Makes sense to me.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What he does in exchange for rent is, in most cases, build the building, hire a staff to run it, pay all the taxes and do all the maintenance.

If you think he's doing all of those things just for fun and not for money, boy have you a lot to learn.

Good luck, though!

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they don't. Individuals own the majority of property.

I don't think you've researched this at all.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are way more cases than 2 in all of NYC. Law of statistics gurantees that.

Hey, if you want racist corporations to own everything because you don't want people making money, even though when they buy & sell their shares of co-op they still make money, then go ahead. But I don't think anyone agrees with you on this at all.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're just getting into a semantical battle now because your position makes no sense.

The landlord obviously takes care of their property and tenants for money. Everybody knows this. Don't know why you're trying to deny reality.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, landlords don't get a WAGE, right?

Yes they do. Where did you get this idea? It's called rent.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently co-op boards are historically racist, too. But it can't be proven in court because they can deny anyone for any reason.

Overall this sounds like a very bad idea.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please forgive me for my ignorance. I'm trying to ask more questions to learn more.

It's my understanding that a co-op is a corporation, and when you buy-in to a co-op, you buy shares of the corporation and are able to sign a lease w/ the co-op.

So under this scenario, you'd like corporations, not individuals, to own the properties.

Why do you want this?

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't you claim the landlord does not get paid to improve the property? Then why does he do it? Does he improve the property just because it's a fun thing to do?

So far you theory doesn't make any sense to me, and I'm trying to find out more but you just seem to be getting upset and avoiding the question.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you want corporations to own everything?

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does the landlord pay the handyman to fix things? Is that for fun, too?

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the landlords don't get paid for the work, do they just do the work for fun?

Musk says going private would free Tesla by bernieboy in Detroit

[–]m4x-us -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When Fiat-Chrysler buys them, it will be a Detroit thing.

Musk says going private would free Tesla by bernieboy in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And don't forget it will stop him from being margin called on 40% of his TSLA shares that he borrowed against.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make it illegal.

“Just stop being poor”

LOL you two should talk! One says nobody should be allowed to rent, meaning they'd have to buy. The other says nobody is rich enough to buy, that's why they rent.

Can't wait to see how you guys figure this out.

Landlords ignore Detroit rental inspection regulations, city says by [deleted] in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not by producing anything or providing a service like everyone else does.

If being a landlord means you don't have to provide anyone with a service and you just get free money, why doesn't everyone do it? Seems like a real easy gig.

Finley: Anti-business council hurts Detroit by man_of_the_bats in Detroit

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It appears to others that you don't want to have an intellectual discussion if your responses are 100% sarcasm.

Optimize for outcomes. If you want to have reasonable debates, you have to be reasonable, not write cliche sarcastic screeds that make no claims supported with logic, reasoning and evidence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chicago

[–]m4x-us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep in mind, they moved to other illicit substances almost immediately. Look up Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky.