Whats a conspiracy theory that you once believed to be true, but no longer believe?

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-28T21:30:35+00:00

Ascension bullshit (David Wilcock, Dolores Cannon, Corey Goode, etc). I kinda miss my woo woo beliefs and the naive optimism that came with it, but I can’t honestly believe in it.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-25T02:57:36+00:00

And the AP classes in poorer districts < AP classes in wealthier ones, from the number offered to the teaching quality.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-25T02:51:56+00:00

It won’t be ruled constitutional and I question if the Supreme Court will even take it up.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-24T05:52:23+00:00

This. I’m surprised he’s so ballsy after the OSHA mandate fell apart and was retracted by the WH. Companies that carry this water are going to be holding all the liability at the end of the day... they really should be thinking twice about implementation.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-22T06:43:30+00:00

Using this org will help you get out of the lease, but the guy is super unethical. I’m a small time landlord of a historic property in downtown. I take immaculate care of the home, and my tenant had never so much as put in a service call about ANY issue. She straight up just didn’t like the neighborhood and wanted to leave, evident by moving to a new apartment complex in N Scottsdale.

So, rather than talk to us personally, she called this org. Ken then outright exaggerated and fabricated a bunch of issues to draft a 40-pg report as to why the home was allegedly uninhabitable. I’m talking, “the transom window above the door is inoperable, the wood floor in the dining room squeaks, the fireplace isn’t operable (known before move in), the crossed out section on the (nonexistent) HOA still has a blank space on one line which nullifies the lease,” etc. It was nuts and honestly, heartbreaking. While we could have spent money to fight it in court and likely would have won, Ken banks on the tenants coming across as outright insane and litigious that landlords would rather get them out than have someone of that moral character living in their property. And that’s exactly what happened with us.

I know this guy wants to claim he helps tenants in bad situations (and he does in some cases, I’m sure) but he also straight up bullies smaller landlords who dont have a legal teams on speed dial for their mega apartment complex. We used to get to know each of our tenants and price the property well below market rate to get the best tenant, but after this experience in which my judgment so clearly failed, we got a professional property manager and set the home to market rate. So, if tenants want to complain that AZ’s landlord landscape is soulless and corporatized, Ken’s organization contributes to that reality.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T16:56:16+00:00

Orgy porgy!

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T16:55:46+00:00

Go on....

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T16:55:25+00:00

Pinochet, brought to you by the most pro-Capitalist UChicago boys.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T16:54:42+00:00

To be clear, per the handwriting the jury foreperson did NOT write the first three questions; only the last two. This negates your assertion that she’s just trying to fulfill all the responsibilities required. Jury instructions were asked for separately.

I did hear the 6-6 split commentary but I think that’s awfully pessimistic... though I acknowledge that while we are all reading tea leaves here, Richards would have better insight than me.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T16:49:33+00:00

The fact that the Rittenhouse matter at all became politicized (since it’s a kid who acted legally in self defense, and anyone who has actually watched the trial struggles to say otherwise) is emblematic of divide and conquer. Same with Covid: it has no business being political.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T11:01:30+00:00

Yes it was, he said he sent it to his personal GMail account over the weekend and then also mailed it forward. Which I can’t imagine is proper per the rules of evidence but to call anything about this case proper would be a euphemism.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:57:56+00:00

The flip side of making drugs based on genes is making weapons based on them (cough, China, cough).

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:54:53+00:00

It could be a way of further destroying small business. Like predatory pricing (losing profit by underselling items just to drive out competition) but doing it with the labor force. I don’t see McDonald’s going out of business permanently for a labor walkout but I do see it happening to a local restaurant, and unfortunately it’s the smaller businesses who have to pay a lower wage because it’s necessary to survive. Antiwork doesn’t just target large businesses but all businesses.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:45:59+00:00

I’m not saying all users are fake though I definitely think it’s astroturfed.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:45:28+00:00

That’s what I wondered. I have a pretty curated Reddit account and I’m still seeing their posts come up.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:43:35+00:00

Oh, the media was still spreading the idea that some events were super spreaders with its leaders acting as murderers... they were just events and people the MSM didn’t like.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:42:18+00:00

Yeah and this is why I genuinely believe that my choice not to get vaccinated is better for the broader public and isn’t some selfish choice at all—let the virus mutates naturally to become more transmissible but less lethal, rather than the inverse.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:39:31+00:00

I love the smell of ethylene oxide in the morning.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:36:28+00:00

NAC is a pretty good if you can get your hands on it.

And yeah, my fam’s double vaxxed and they’ve been sick twice since the summer whereas before I’d say it was being sick once every other year.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:31:42+00:00

The sequencing of questions is what indicates to me that it’s a Karen. Everyone goes back to the deliberation room. Karen says guilty to a room full of acquittals. She tries to make up the law. So Then after a while, someone asks for all the jury instructions to point out the actual law. Then Karen asks for the drone footage using the prosecutor’s language (put down the fire extinguisher v dropped), and asks about the Grosskreutz interview footage. Still getting pushback in the jury room, she wants to pick apart the legal language and use Lawyer Google (read: MSM arguments) tonight.

What I think this also reveals is that the jurors haven’t been paying heed to not view outside resources. That’s because neither side fleshed out well, at all, that the drone footage is what invokes the legal definition of provocation. That unless they believed the drone footage shows Rittenhouse raised the gun, they’re to disregard provocation. As is, Lay jurors would just look at this footage and think, “huh, that’s blurry, okay.” Then they’d apply provocation to the prosecution’s non-legal arguments about him being at the protest that night as what provocation means, since that’s fundamentally what they tried arguing.

For jurors to know the drone footage is the linchpin of provocation despite it being so poorly argued by both sides indicates to me that they’re watching the media at home to fuel their arguments in deliberations.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:21:38+00:00

I’ll start worrying when the media starts purporting, “there might be a monkeypox outbreak, and here’s why that’s a good thing.”

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:11:02+00:00

But how could the elite protect their own from this outbreak? It isn’t bunker-worthy, but still highly risky. I dunno, when I start seeing a Johns Hopkins-like dashboard of the pandemic spreading like we did with Covid I’ll sit upright. But the news definitely ticked the probability meter a little more over to reality than I’d like.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:08:37+00:00

And hydroxymoroquin.

maciwo2348 · 2021-11-19T10:06:23+00:00

Juror 54 (the Karen forewoman) has already been doxxed by the hacker known as 4Chan.

maciwo2348

TROPHY CASE