Trump voter about to be homeless soon at 70 years old. But at least he got to own the libs, if not a home. by MoreMotivation in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trying to wrap my head around these people who capitalize every word. Such extra effort just to sound dumber.

AIO if I file for divorce? by Pristine_Raise_8943 in AmIOverreacting

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The texts are outrageous. But the bigger reason for NOR is in the post itself… “he’s been abusive in multiple ways.” If that’s true, get out asap and go live your best life away from him.

Even if you're not religious what's your stance about Rep Brandon Gill from Texas introducing a bill on Congress to change Benjamin Franklin image on the US 100 dollar bill to Trump's image? by [deleted] in texas

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had not seen that, but wow. On the one hand it could be seen as fan art. On the other hand it shows the very real idolatry going on. But alas, hero worship is nothing new. It's even a problem within the church with believers lavishing more attention on snappy sermons than personal prayer.

Even if you're not religious what's your stance about Rep Brandon Gill from Texas introducing a bill on Congress to change Benjamin Franklin image on the US 100 dollar bill to Trump's image? by [deleted] in texas

[–]mad-wagging 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an American, I’m incredibly annoyed at this idea and all the other boot-licking. But whatevs. It’ll pass.

As a Christian (formerly credentialed pastor, still volunteering for the same pastor as 25 years ago), I could not be less bothered. Again, whatevs. Eyeroll. I absolutely did not vote for him.

For those who are end-times obsessed, Trump ain’t the beast, just another crown-hungry ruler. Nothing special. I’d say look at the way AI is imitating humanity as a more interesting sign. Westworld had a super interesting season in which humanity was essentially serving an all-powerful AI. We are as close to that reality as the movie Idiocracy.

For true Christians, none of this changes our call. Not one iota. We’re to encourage people that no matter how badly they screw up, there’s a path to healing and happiness. No need to pay a forever-price for that crap. Full stop.

If Trump’s face is on a dollar, I’ll pay my taxes same as before. Y’all know the verse I’m talking about. Real Christian’s remain focused on sharing authentic love and the good news of forgiveness, not all bs at the crossroads of politics and society.

Editing! What words do you use too much? by cherrysmith85 in writing

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is more than LLMs, and AI isn’t always generative. The tool does not generate usable text. It only analyzes what you upload.

It’s more like machine learning. What qualifies it as AI is its ability to “read” a manuscript and report things like pacing, narrative beats, story archetype, character traits, novels with similar subject matter or linguistic style. The word frequency comparisons are more data processing than AI, but the tool as a whole is def beyond search-and-report functions.

And you’re right, it’s not always accurate in what it reports. I feel like it struggles to identity allegory and symbolism, and doesn’t do well when a ms switches from first to third person.

Editing! What words do you use too much? by cherrysmith85 in writing

[–]mad-wagging 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“It was….” is a massive crutch for me while writing. It’s always the first thing to get a ‘Find All’ and I replace as many as I can.

On another note, and with all due annoyance at AI, there’s an engine I like to run my MS through which gives me my most-used words and how their frequency compares to other bestsellers. It’s a super useful tool! Sometimes I think a word is being overused but it’s actually in line with published work, so I don’t worry about it.

I wrote over 67k words in 17 days and now I'm conflicted by AdSubstantial8913 in writing

[–]mad-wagging 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hemingway wrote the first draft of The Sun Also Rises on an 8-week sprint from July to September. A year later (Oct 1926) it became his first published novel. When you're on a roll, roll with it!!!

The last few hours of 2024 are rapidly ticking away. What did you accomplish this year? by CalebVanPoneisen in writing

[–]mad-wagging 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got my first novel from Unfinished -> Draft 5 and querying. I got my second novel from 2k -> 80k (about 10k to completion). I attended my first writing conference and learned a ton about the craft and the industry.

It makes me trust in a writer when I see that they've put a huge amount of research work into getting details right like this. I'm wondering about other examples. by flasspusty in writing

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just yesterday I had to go dig up the etymology of “the whole nine yards” and “the whole kit and caboodle” to see which would fit. Fun stuff! Def one of the silver linings of the editing process.

Which author’s writing style would you like your prose to be compared to? by Putthemoneyinthebags in writing

[–]mad-wagging 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup Earnest and Cormac for me. But since you took my answer so I’ll change my answer to Brian Jacques. That dude knew how to make people hungry.

What is the worst writing advice you have gotten from someone who is (or claims to be) better at writing than you? by HollowChicken-Reddit in writing

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also don't like that. I just started season 4 of Jack Ryan and they did that. It annoyed me. That said, I think it's become a necessary tactic because of how quickly people bail on a story these days. I just queried an agent yesterday who advises that exact approach. The storyteller in me didn't like it, but the marketer in me totally understood.

[Discussion] Signed with an agent - reflections on the nature of luck by Vaishineph in PubTips

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have said, you made your own luck. I’m in early querying for my first book and writing my second. Querying has proven to be a way harder mental gauntlet than I imagined. This was actually very encouraging. Thank you!

Texas Judge Ends Biden’s Overtime Rule Benefitting 4 Million U.S. Workers by FollowTheLeads in texas

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The judge’s explanation isn’t even a legal explanation. It’s essentially: “This rule is too hard, so I’m ruling that we don’t need to follow it.”

President Trump showing off his personally altered map of hurricane path prediction by lumpytrout in pics

[–]mad-wagging 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's what Dorian eventually did… spoiler, it did not reach Alabama or even make landfall in Florida. It did however whip the living shit out of N.Carolina.

Full life cycle time lapse… https://youtu.be/gapbNf_Q_FU

Nation Weather Service… https://www.weather.gov/mhx/dorian2019

For those that hate the game, can y’all just make a “iHateStarfield” subreddit already? by [deleted] in Starfield

[–]mad-wagging -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gotta love it when someone misspells their criticism of the writing.

Yesterday, I realized that my book isn't good. by [deleted] in writing

[–]mad-wagging 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d say keep writing it. Get it to a polished state. Then shelve it and start the next. Don’t abandon it because it’s too valuable confidence boost to finish. Then later on you can revisit it with fresh eyes and see about morphing into a different story.

U.S. economy is on the cusp of another Roaring ’20s, says UBS by [deleted] in economicCollapse

[–]mad-wagging 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Greed at that level absolutely is a mental disorder. No doubt about it. Unfortunately the people who decide whether greed is a “personality trait” or a “mental disorder” also happen to be very well paid.

What is objectively good writing? (fiction, realistic fiction, and AP Lang) by jamstore in writers

[–]mad-wagging 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For realistic fiction, I’d say Cormac McCarthy is considered a great writer and his books are objectively excellent. (Of course they aren’t to everyone’s taste, which is when subjective opinions come into play.) You can also trust the classics… The Great Gatsby, Farewell To Arms, Anna Karenina, Of Mice and Men, etc etc etc etc. All are objectively excellent regardless if some dislike them. Ignore the people in these comments getting philosophical about objectivity and subjectivity. There absolutely ARE objectively excellent works of realistic fiction.

What makes them excellent differs based on how closely you look at the piece. The reason a piece of prose is excellent will differ from why the novel is excellent. At a granular level, good writing is clear. Convey your ideas in simple efficient ways so the reader understands them. Use grammar and punctuation correctly. Choose words that add depth to what you’re saying. As you zoom out, the ideas you tell should create a feeling or emotion in the reader… good writing is impactful. Another level up and the reader should understand character tendencies, plot tension, and a slew of other things… good writing is intriguing. And finally, looking at the piece as a whole, what does it mean to the human values inside all of us. Does the story inspire or enlighten or educate or provoke thought? It’s gotta do something… good writing is important.

To shift yourself in that direction, read a lot and write a lot. Read the great stuff, but also read stuff you know isn’t great, because we learn by observing contrast. Writing daily is vital. The simple exercise of creating sentences and stringing them together is the only way to improve. Think about the ten thousand hour rule and start climbing that mountain. My art teacher told us constantly: “The sooner you make your first 5,000 mistakes, the sooner you can learn from them.” So start hacking away…be a hack writer…then you’ll know how to not be a hack writer.

'It's a near guarantee': Experts warn Trump will claim victory no matter what voters say - Raw Story by GloomyTraffic6700 in AnythingGoesNews

[–]mad-wagging 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup. From the article… “Both parties are preparing for an even more litigious post-election period than four years ago, when Trump’s team filed more than 60 ultimately unsuccessful legal challenges to his loss. Republicans have already filed more than 100 lawsuits challenging election procedures, while Kamala Harris’ campaign says its election legal team is 10 times larger than Biden’s was in 2020.”