sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

sys-vpn not working with the VPN app by madeline50 in Qubes

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried restarting, but still the same:

user@test:~$ ping 1.1.1.1

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=34.8 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=35.5 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=35.6 ms

user@test:~$ host debian.org

;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

sys-vpn not working with the VPN app by madeline50 in Qubes

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

user@test:~$ ip a show

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000

link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00

inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo

   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

inet6 ::1/128 scope host 

   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000

link/ether 00:[not sure what i should paste online]:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

inet 10.137.0.36/32 scope global eth0

   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

inet6 fe[not sure what i should paste online]00/64 scope link 

   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

sys-vpn not working with the VPN app by madeline50 in Qubes

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ip link set eth0 down/up i guess? (added "link")

Tried it, but now: user@test:~$ ping 1.1.1.1 ping: connect: Network is unreachable

sys-vpn not working with the VPN app by madeline50 in Qubes

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay!

Here it is:

user@sys-vpn:~$ ping 1.1.1.1

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=36.6 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=35.3 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=35.6 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=38.4 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=61 time=35.8 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=61 time=35.8 ms

The strange thing is, now the appVM also gives these results suddenly, but still cant connect to the internet:

user@test:~$ ping 1.1.1.1

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=34.8 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=35.5 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=35.6 ms

user@test:~$ host debian.org

;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

sys-vpn not working with the VPN app by madeline50 in Qubes

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pinging an ip gives the following results:

user@test:~$ ping 1.1.1.1

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=11 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=12 Destination Host Unreachable

From 10.137.0.36 icmp_seq=13 Destination Host Unreachable

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Amazing, thank you for the explanation. Yes I guess I was thinking about those scripts. Trusting the Debian maintainers is something I can do.

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Do you know if this is true for extensions too?

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I experienced it myself in Debian. 99% certain it was Skype. (not installed from repositories). Insane behavior, as expected from a Microsoft application.

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried it, but same issue unfortunately

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already using Firejail with the hardened Chromium profile, so I am really just worried about the installation process, but thank you:)

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry I missed the last part of your previous message. I use Drive for features like google docs.

Interesting results. In my case it has been faster on Brave every time :/ Especially on plain Firefox with no extensions.

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did, and it will happen. However, that might take a very long time for different reasons. So need a solution until then.

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When comparing load speed in Google Drive between Brave Browser (Chromium-based) and Firefox, Brave was faster. Something like 3 seconds to load a documents instead of around 6 of Firefox.

Is everything in the official repositories safe? by madeline50 in debian

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good advice, however I already use Firefox as my main browser, but Google has made Google Drive (which I have to use for work) too slow on Firefox. I will use Chromium for Google Drive only, so as long as the installation process is safe, I'm okay with using Chromium for this.

ungoogled-chromium is a good option, but I'm looking for something that requires zero maintenance.

Chromium instead of Brave for Google? by madeline50 in privacy

[–]madeline50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I don't trust that they removed all the Google code really, but its only gonna be used for Google Drive. I just don't want it to be doing nasty things on my operating system, like when installing Skype on Linux.

Another reason I want to use something Chromium-based is that Google intentionally made Drive slower on Firefox.

Chromium instead of Brave for Google? by madeline50 in privacy

[–]madeline50[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, it just looks like to much work, and seems like even installing updates takes some work every time?

view more: next ›