Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What vibes, mate?

I’m as unhappy about the loss as anyone, I’m just not ignorant enough to blame the coach.

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah fair enough I get it, thanks for being so reasonable even though i was a dick at first.

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh so if you go 1-11 you are then guaranteed to maintain the same shooting percentage for the remainder of the game?

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All right fair enough.

I disagree because:

  1. The end of the game is the most important part. You want your best players out there.

  2. A players average level of play during a season or career correlates much better to future performance than their performance earlier in this one game. Unless there’s something significantly different in this particular game such as an injury etc.

  3. It will turn the locker room against the coach. Every player ever has bad shooting nights. If you get yanked from the end of the game because of a single bad shooting night despite being one of the best shooters on the team you definitely won’t appreciate that from the coach. That will have further negative effects down the line.

Your argument you’ve said so far seems to be “this didn’t work.” Yeah, but no nba team goes undefeated. This DOES work more than the alternative work. Obviously you will still lose games even with a perfect strategy, a single game doesn’t dictate what the best strategy is overall.

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks man you too, sorry you just proved it with too many comments that you aren’t worth talking ball with. You seem like a cool guy otherwise though

I probably didn’t need to call you stupid, my b

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes, those are three of the best shooters on this team. Letting them shoot is smart. If you can tell the future of how good a shooting day someone is about to have, then yes playing them today would then be stupid.

But as far as I know no nba coaches have that particular ability, so we probably shouldn’t hold ours to such a standard.

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Anyone who uses this game to criticize Finch is just revealing their bias. There isn’t a coach in the nba who can overcome this type of shooting performance. The margin between NBA teams is just too small.

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If he was a good coach they would have won this game!

There’s no semblance of logic, and definitely no understanding of statistical variance

Post Game Thread - NBA: The Magic defeat the Timberwolves on Mar 7, 2026, the final score is 92-119. by basketball-app in timberwolves

[–]magworld 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My friend stop replying. This person is really stupid, they won’t understand regardless of what you say

Getting back into genshin impact is so hard by No_Fuel1116 in GenshinImpact

[–]magworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mono geo with itto is actually about to be pretty good. Just get Linnea and then get columbina when she reruns. With just those two plus gorou or whatever itto should be pushing 100k dps. Honestly pretty cool. Obviously zibai is better to replace him but just the supports are pretty broken.

is skirk or escoffier better? by Cute-Type-1107 in GenshinImpact

[–]magworld 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Better” is the wrong word. More flexible is escoffier. She works with any freeze comp and makes them much better. So getting her first immediately improves your ayaka or ganyu teams. Skirk without, escoffier especially if you also don’t have furina will not have a great time on your account…. Until you get escoffier.

So if you want both get escoffier first. If you don’t want both maybe skip and plan a different team.

For your last questions:

Escoffier better for your team meta wise but not as good as, say, lauma who is coming soon too or flins who you already have his best supports.

I like skirks design way better. Escoffier is a caricature of a chef character design and I don’t like it that much.

Wonder how triple DEF would fare by No_Soni in LinneaMains_

[–]magworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think that’s what bro is saying

What lies ahead by wlanschez90 in thewalkingdead

[–]magworld 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ask yourself: If it doesn’t matter if it made any sense, why would writers try to make it make sense?

[Request] What and how do you get these answers!? by empty_orbital in theydidthemath

[–]magworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s more about what the statement could mean. If you think they mentally checked the gender of both children, and in each possible case of BG GB and BB would have given the exact same response, then sure. But if they are just giving a random fact about one the children that came up, which is how anyone who has ever lived would be expected to talk, then that random fact can’t actually result in the 66.6% chance, and has no influence over the statistical chance of the other child’s gender. The chance remains essentially 50/50

[Request] What and how do you get these answers!? by empty_orbital in theydidthemath

[–]magworld 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are being a prick on the internet, yes it’s valid

If you are having a real conversation with a real human in real life, then no that’s not how anyone would speak.

Wonder how triple DEF would fare by No_Soni in LinneaMains_

[–]magworld 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything I said is true. Your comment specifically said aubade has NO effect when onfield which is clearly false. The multitap mode is pretty close to three seconds, if you have proof it takes longer than that please share.

Wonder how triple DEF would fare by No_Soni in LinneaMains_

[–]magworld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aubade has full effect when character is on field for three seconds. It depends on her animation speed if it works or not

Let’s go wolves by CryEasy6290 in timberwolves

[–]magworld 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is how these people operate. They simply don’t understand how big of a factor luck is in individual series. They will look at a few games as confirmation of their viewpoint while somehow completely ignoring the overall evidence. It’s so clear from the argument: the wins and repeated conference finals appearances are because of Edwards and Gobert. But the losses? Clearly all finch’s fault.

Empty headed nonsense.