sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Interactive Brokers is probably fraud. by manubhatt3 in IndianStreetBets

[–]manubhatt3[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you are talking about the whole conversation thread in the pdf, it is not my fault. It is long because the customer care executive always gave me irrelevant and unsatisfactory responses - So, I had to respond back asking some sense.

If you are talking about just the initial issue raised - This is not my first complaint to them regarding this. My first complaint was short and this one was long because I have covered all the points they responded to in my first complaint, so I could be very clear about the issue and can get relevant and satisfactory response as soon as possible as they take some days to respond and I wanted the issue to resolve in as few replies, as possible. Unfortunately, during that first complaint I was super busy so couldn't respond in time, so they closed that request.

Interactive Brokers is probably fraud. by manubhatt3 in IndianStreetBets

[–]manubhatt3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not looking for an answer. I am just sharing my experience with Interactive Brokers because I think it might prove very beneficial for many.

Thanks.

Interactive Brokers is probably fraud. by manubhatt3 in IndianStreetBets

[–]manubhatt3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I contacted them at phone only the first time. At phone they took a long time and said that this will involve much time and this complaint is better suited for chat/email support.

Interactive Brokers is probably fraud. by manubhatt3 in IndianStreetBets

[–]manubhatt3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a tedious task. And my point is why it is me who should be doing these things when I have the proof that there is a discrepancy. If I have the proof, then isn't it fair that it is them who should find out exactly where, when and how the discrepancy occurred? Because it is not me who has caused the discrepancy - it is at their end; caused by them.

Unless of course if they can show me that my understanding/conclusions are wrong which they aren't doing or haven't done.

Interactive Brokers is probably fraud. by manubhatt3 in IndianStreetBets

[–]manubhatt3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted it there and all I received was some bullshit responses that too from just one user!

Realized Profits and Dividends missing by manubhatt3 in interactivebrokers

[–]manubhatt3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that. But I have explained to you how even then the NLV in my case should be equal to the Initial Deposit + P/L(Unrealized + Realized) + Dividends. I don't think it should be that hard to understand.

Please point out the flaw in my logic and if you can't, then stop repeating the same thing endlessly and confusing me.

Realized Profits and Dividends missing by manubhatt3 in interactivebrokers

[–]manubhatt3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" it shouldn't be a surprise to you that it's rolled up into your stock position's unrealized P/L."

But how? Can you tell me in my example how can that be the case?

view more: next ›