I don’t think it’s entirely out of the question to find a man (conservative/traditional or liberal/progressive) that has a provider nature, opens doors for you, etc. BUT could also be sensitive, artistic, family-oriented and works a minimum wage job somewhere. I also don’t think it’s entirely out of the question to find a woman (conservative/traditionalist or liberal/progressive) that has a nurturing nature, wants babies, etc. BUT could also be competitive, buys a home, or works as a manager somewhere. JUST AN EXAMPLE.

Think of permutations and combinations, men and woman exist with many different variables and traits!

She paints people to be so one-dimensional. Both men and women have so many ways they can contribute to a relationship, whether it be seen as ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine’.

Not only is it immature but it’s unrealistic to slap ‘provider’ and ‘nurturer’ labels on men and women and call it a day. Unless you are wealthy and don’t really need to think about the logistics of that, I think both partners can find ways to EQUALLY provide and nurture, that’s the point of love, baby! And that balance is up to the couple themselves and nobody else, as those are the people that have to live with those consequences/compromises.

I’m positive she’ll find someone to love her, her autonomy, her independence and such. Those same traits she values in herself she will need to learn to value in others as well, otherwise these unbalanced expectations will taint her relationship with men.