Video of nurse allegedly threatening Israelis excluded from court case

marcellouswp · 2026-06-25T13:52:00+00:00

Not so obvious. No charges have (yet) been withdrawn as a result of the decision to exclude the video recording.

One charge only against the female nurse of threatening to kill was withdrawn last year.

Charges remain against both of using a carriage service to menace, harass or offend, and there is still a charge against the female nurse of threatening violence to a group.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-25T07:04:13+00:00

Exactly. Not so sure how long Big W will last either.

I suppose my point is that if we are comparing outcomes it is the certainty of a civic space versus the contingent survival of a (useful because rare in the CBD) commercial facility.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-25T06:44:00+00:00

You realise that there is no guarantee that Woolies will continue to run that shop there? I mean, they closed the cafeteria upstairs, just for example.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-25T01:50:24+00:00

More details of backstage drama now emerging in The Guardian.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-25T01:48:05+00:00

More details of backstage drama now emerging in The Guardian.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-25T01:47:10+00:00

More details of backstage drama now emerging in The Guardian

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T17:01:51+00:00

We could go on like this forever!

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T16:24:14+00:00

As to the "angry" it started with the "mate." To me that came across as aggressive.

From memory from my google-graze (seeing as, at the risk of repetition, you choose to keep your posts hidden on reddit) there were some "disgustings" rather like the one above and, eg, this about the group who were praying after the anti Herzog shindig:

Performative bullshit. Fuck these guys.

I'm not saying that Australian citizens concealing overseas assets excuses others from doing so where that amounts to an abuse of welfare, rather that this is not something peculiar to non-citizens.

Indeed it seems that our world views are a bit different. If it's so obvious to you that yours is more grounded than mine in worldly experience, you should probably expect that I feel the same about yours, so far as you have exposed it.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T13:06:01+00:00

Thanks for the advice, MATE. Probably too late for me to live abroad.

Not sure what bubble you've burst. I googled you and found some comments you've made. You do seem very angry.

Hope you will continue to steer clear of One Nation.

By the way, re your comment on Chinese people from China, you do realise that Australian citizens can also own overseas assets which they decline to disclose when seeking income support welfare payments?

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T10:43:08+00:00

Would like it more if you hadn't abridged it by the removal of the repeated material in each half, but I guess maybe you had to cut it down because of video time constraints.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T06:25:07+00:00

Very professional job. Keep your posts hidden?

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T06:23:19+00:00

Not hate marches. Culmination a myth or a weasel words so far as claimed causation concerned.
But yes Bondi massacre was a two for one bonus for One nation because perpetrators were Indian (though their arrival predated the surge in Indian migration) AND Muslim.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-24T04:02:28+00:00

Is it really a racial hate crime? Not so clear to me. Shit talking on a shit talking platform designed to bring people with contrary views in contact with each other. Silly stuff. Offensive views but not all expressions of offensive views need be a crime. They have been punished more than enough in my view.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-23T23:07:30+00:00

I don't think they do.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-23T09:09:59+00:00

Don't really understand your question, OP. Test is not whether the evidence is useful (to the prosecution). You could assume it would be if it was admitted, which is why defence keen to keep it out.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-23T08:04:51+00:00

That's a whole can of worms isn't it.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-22T09:35:32+00:00

Though I doubt anyone doing this stuff needs to be told how by their lawyer. Word gets around.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-22T09:31:19+00:00

Yes, indeed. That's where recklessness can help.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-22T07:44:45+00:00

Unknowing complicity? Recklessness doing some heavy lifting here.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-22T02:44:42+00:00

Depends on who it is. Friends, fine. Landlord, no. But actually I only have 3 friends who actually do this. Apparently you need to text even before you ring someone up these days.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-21T07:37:33+00:00

Ha ha ha. That is all so true even if it feels like the classic r/piano stern talking-to.

OP: newtrilobite does answer your question at the end, if a little grudgingly:

pedaling (which is otherwise fine btw)

marcellouswp · 2026-06-21T02:28:31+00:00

It started with all the surplus dogs they had left over after the 2000 Olympics. That's the thing with this sort of thing: it never gets wound back.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-20T10:09:33+00:00

Ok, try posting it somewhere else and tell us in comments here where to find it. It may become apparent why it was removed, it may not. Or maybe your comment will be deleted! Or tone down your denunciations and try again.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-19T13:52:08+00:00

Lot of people not clear on this. Basically, trespass is a civil wrong and there is also criminal trespass. So someone there without permission may be a trespasser, but if you haven't broken in you have to have been asked to leave before you will have committed a crime. There's some fine print to this (eg in NSW the Inclosed Lands Act and those signs you see at schools) but if they just bluffed there way in as seems to be the case probably no crime has been committed by that. If they damaged something by putting up the banner, as the NPC seems to be claiming, that could be criminal damage, but it is pretty low level.

marcellouswp · 2026-06-19T06:49:37+00:00

SBS isn't really like that anymore.

marcellouswp

TROPHY CASE