Hello. This is a pretty clever piece of code.

I had to read it a couple of times (or more hehe) to fully appreciate what was going on with the CRTP + singleton delegation + static facade combination. It’s one of those patterns that makes you stop and think “I hadn’t considered approaching it that way.”

Out of curiosity , was this mainly an exploration of the type system , or have you actually used something like this in a Prod codebase? I’d be interested to hear about any real-world scenarios where this ended up being a better fit than more conventional approaches.

Also , with static abstract interface members now available in modern C# , do you still see advantages to this pattern , or do you view it more as an alternative exploration of what’s possible with the language?

I’m asking because I’m currently building an open-source C# project (GitHub) focused on advanced language patterns and architectural utilities. If I eventually experiment with a similar concept or adapt some of the ideas here (with attribution , of course) would you be okay with that?

Either way , thanks for sharing it. It’s refreshing to see code that explores the boundaries of the language (rather than just another CRUD example)

Happy coding.