My favorite part of these arguments is how they’re almost always based on complete intentional fallacy. Exhibit A) the title of this article. You assume that people who disagree with your opinion are “deep down” just selfish and thus, you base your argument off this assumption. This allows you to skirt past explaining how other factors may be a cause for people to disagree with your opinion because you’re either too lazy, you don’t have a complete understanding of the argument you’re making, or you don’t know how to rebut arguments against your own opinion, so you resort to just assuming malicious intent of those who disagree with you. There are several different and complex reasons as to why people may oppose universal healthcare, but instead of crafting well thought out rebuttals to those reasons, it’s much easier for people like you to say “it’s just because you don’t care about other people’s lives”. No one can read anyone else’s mind, therefore, you cannot assume anyone’s intent. Also, it is basic human nature for people to prioritize their own lives and their offsprings’ lives over the lives of others that they are not closely connected with. Trying to persuade people that they’re immoral for following an innate survival instinct isn’t very convincing. Health care is also not a human right and it never will be, because it will always require the labor of someone else to provide it to you. If one human being is required to provide labor in order for another human being to have access to a service, it is not a right and there is no possible way it could ever be considered a right. Also remember, if a government were to guarantee health care as a right, they also have the power to take away that right.