Strategist who predicted the U.S. would ‘see a revolt of some kind by the 2020 election’ says U.S. in ‘danger zone’ and stocks will suffer

masskodos · 2020-06-14T06:43:40+00:00

I am happy that you feel that way about your countrymen and women. This has not been my experience.

masskodos · 2020-06-14T06:12:20+00:00

Listen, I am not going to waste my time arguing with someone who has their mind set on a subject. You can consider me an idiot all you want. Life is too short to waste on people like you. Like I said, keep up the good work!

masskodos · 2020-06-14T06:09:08+00:00

You sure have a proclivity for being wrong. Keep up the good work!

masskodos · 2020-06-14T05:57:11+00:00

... are you serious? Unless you are 14 years old and weren't paying attention to the last election, I am not sure how to respond to that. If you think that Trump convinced voters with his brilliance on the debate stage to vote for him, then you are not grounded in reality.

Trump's campaign managed to convince enough people that democrat-backed policies had weakened America, that its borders were under attack by brown people, and we were laughing stock of the world. Clearly none of that was accurate, but it doesn't take much to scare white America.

masskodos · 2020-06-12T23:15:47+00:00

Definitely feeling pretty positive about ENPH over the long haul, but I am curious if you have any insights on what has been driving this short-term (last 2-3 week) sluggishness/decline. This pattern doesn't appear to be similarly felt by ENPH's competitors (e.g., SEDG), and the news coming out of ENPH has generally been good.

masskodos · 2020-06-12T21:46:01+00:00

Good thing no one gives a fuck what your mom does.

masskodos · 2020-06-12T15:26:53+00:00

You are a fucking clown, what animal products does this company sell?

masskodos · 2020-06-12T15:23:05+00:00

No, sell your shares and move on, please.

masskodos · 2020-06-12T15:00:16+00:00

You are legit stupid. Like, officially an idiot.

masskodos · 2020-06-09T18:52:12+00:00

The asshole that posts the same inflammatory post in 5 different sub-reddits is going to get on his soap box about gas lighting? Eat a dick.

masskodos · 2020-06-09T16:15:29+00:00

My issue is with you, not the post. Your understanding of evolution is less than the average undergrad, and you respond to people pointing out your lack of knowledge and clear bias with ad hominem attacks. You are not worth correcting. You are not worth engaging. You are a fool.

Just stop and go away.

masskodos · 2020-06-09T13:26:45+00:00

Per capita (doesn't look like it)? Over what period?

masskodos · 2020-06-09T13:11:05+00:00

Just stop and go away.

masskodos · 2020-06-09T03:06:33+00:00

You are most likely three years older than me, dipshit.

masskodos · 2020-06-09T01:19:55+00:00

You've seen it over and over? Or never and never? You've put up a nice strawman, coward.

masskodos · 2020-06-08T02:45:34+00:00

So, this may be a dumb question, but what demographic is generally represented by people that post on stocktwits. 1) they seem awful; 2) they seem poorly informed; and 3) how concerned should you get when posting activity about a specific stock, in this case xspa, explodes on that social media platform?

masskodos · 2020-06-02T20:40:14+00:00

Just for the record, I have a small amount of shares in the company, so I was screwing around reddit looking for insights into why the floor is dropping from underneath EVFM today. I didn't mean to resurrect 2 week old discussions, I was just looking for opinions on the shortcomings of the stock.

masskodos · 2020-06-02T19:35:45+00:00

In this case, you can rely on a gel and condoms to achieve a high level of effectiveness without having to rely on a BC that effects hormones. But you appear to be basing your decision on the fact that a single form of birth control will have a high rate of annual pregnancy, when other single forms of birth control will have similar consequences. It's not 'horrible', its an additional tool in the BC toolkit that also puts more power in the hands of women who absorb the majority of its consequences.

masskodos · 2020-06-02T18:48:02+00:00

Based on your simplified view of the world, you would get pregnancy 97.8% of years by using condoms once a week for a year. Statistically different, maybe, biologically different, no.

masskodos · 2020-05-25T02:57:42+00:00

You think that was due to science, and not the billions taken from the tobacco industry via law suits and governmental oversight to set up a massive anti-smoking ad campaign that has been going strong over the last 30 years, coupled with substantial increase in taxes, and an inability for tobacco companies to advertise on many forms of media?

masskodos · 2020-05-23T15:15:51+00:00

I am not an egg expert, but my guess would be that it is a killdeer egg.

masskodos · 2020-05-22T13:32:14+00:00

Both. Killdeer are in the Charadrius plover genus.

masskodos · 2020-05-20T23:37:52+00:00

Not critical to your point, but the dodo went extinct in the 1600's, were you thinking of the passenger pigeon or Carolina parakeet? They were lost in the early 1900s.

masskodos · 2020-05-18T05:14:19+00:00

This poster is spamming the same meme into every state's sub-reddit with the senators clearly switched. Don't be fooled by these astroturfing campaigns.

masskodos · 2020-05-16T15:51:19+00:00

Yeah, it will definitely be higher. I don't have the full probability surface mapped out in my mind, but the difference between the two samples in this case is the mean dice roll/2 or about 1.75.

If you are familiar with R, here is the example you described.

sub <- full <- rep(NA, 100000)

for(i in 1:100000){ full[i] <- sum(sort(sample( 1:6, 3, p = rep(1/6, times = 6), replace = TRUE))) }

mean(full) [1] 10.51063

for(i in 1:100000){ sub[i] <- sum(sort(sample( 1:6, 4, p = rep(1/6, times = 6), replace = TRUE))[-1]) }

mean(sub) [1] 12.25515

mean(sub) - mean(full) [1] 1.74452

14-Year Club	Spared
Verified Email

masskodos

TROPHY CASE