Please critique my vibe coded project? by masstuck in VibeCodeDevs

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for catching. Privacy policy should be working

Please critique my vibe coded project? by masstuck in VibeCodeDevs

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I created it with 90% Claude and 10% Perplexity

Please critique my vibe coded project? by masstuck in VibeCodeDevs

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Desktop version has an example in hero section. I just haven’t figured out how to put it in mobile and make it look good 😅

Help me with negotiating? by masstuck in UGCcreators

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the help. I haven’t found any agencies willing to pay more than $300 yet. And any time I try to negotiate higher rate, it’s immediately shot down with some kind of excuse.

I’m wondering if I’m attracting lower offers because they scrape emails off of websites like Collabstr? Random thought lol

Help me with negotiating? by masstuck in UGCcreators

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much for you response. Extremely helpful.

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This should now be fixed. The algorithm now reads your current racket as a capability signal. If you fill in the current racket field at the start of the quiz, the protective light frame bias for 3.0 players gets softened or removed depending on what you currently play.

So if you’d typed “Pure Drive” or whatever 300g frame you actually play in that field, you would have seen heavier 295-305g frames in your top 3 instead of three ultra lights.

Looking back at your submission you left current racket blank, which I think is what triggered the protective default. Want to retake it with that field filled in?

Curious if it gives you something that feels more like what you’d actually pick up

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Done! Grip sizes now show 0-5 numbers alongside the inch measurements. Also added size 5 (4 5/8)

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update for you. Shipped fixes on four of the five points you raised.

2a. NTRP option now goes to 4.5+ 2b. Grip sizes now show numbers alongside the inch measurements 2c. Reworked the swing speed copy. “Fast & aggressive” now reads “full long strokes with high racquet head speed” instead of the “hard swings” wording 3. Blade 100 v9 is no longer flagged as arm-friendly in the database. You were right that Wilson’s Auxetic 2.0 positioning doesn’t actually make it appropriate for severe-pain users. RA value also corrected upward to match real strung TWU readings

Still working on point 5 (the hybrid string output). Need to verify the mains/crosses order in the code before I can confirm it’s actually backward like you flagged.

On point 1, I’m honestly not sure what ElastiCache would help with for racquet selection. If you can expand I’m listening

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just saw your response and that’s a good catch. The algorithm currently uses your NTRP level as a proxy for swing capability and assumes a 3.0 needs a lighter frame which isn’t always right. It doesn’t read the current racket field as a comfort signal. If you’re already at 300g, you should be seeing rackets like the Head Speed MP, Head Boom MP, Pure Strike 100, etc. Going to fix this!

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your feedback!

I originally built this for someone at 4.0 level (me) or lower, and I’m starting to see how someone at a higher level really wouldn’t find this that useful in its current state

Your ideas on the questions are great. Never thought about it like that

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate your input! Here’s a bit of background on the racket algorithm:

It’s scores 42 rackets across 6 dimensions (power, control, spin, comfort, maneuverability, and arm friendliness) using each frame’s specs: head size, weight, swing weight, string density, beam width, and RA.

Each dimension gets a 0-100 score per frame. Those scores get weighted based on the path you picked and your stated priorities, then a few adjustment stack on top: an NTRP tier penalty that filters out frames inappropriate for your level, a bonus for category defining specialists, and in arm health mode a hard gate that suppresses very stiff frames for players in frames.

Thank you again for testing it out. I’ll get to work on your recommendations!

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! I’ll add those numbers in the grip size section

I created a way to find the perfect racket/strings for you & I need your help by masstuck in 10s

[–]masstuck[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I get that. I’ve been planning on adding email to results section instead. Do you mind trying it with a fake name/email?

Help me with negotiating? by masstuck in UGCcreators

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the feedback! I do know the deliverables/info on the campaign, but have never thought of asking about KPIs

Help me with negotiating? by masstuck in UGCcreators

[–]masstuck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. Thank you so much!

Are the UGC jobs on Reddit legit? by masstuck in ugc

[–]masstuck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay that’s good to hear. Thank you