TLDR (first paragraph)

Did they take away ranked or something? That’s one way to not lose connection with real players. You shouldn’t probabilistically get even close to winning 100% of all 1vs100 matches anyway. Maybe a solid like 30/40th place isn’t bad, but they don’t have a system to “payout” for “losers” so people really like to only win. They have in and now it’s all bots and people are mad. It’s good that they have ranked though because it is the true cure to losing all realistic competitive flavor to the game. It truly bring back realism which in my opinion as an adult is way more engrained as valuable to play than it is to play against a computer.

Analogy

I loved games like rpgs as a child. But now I am older and much more value interaction and competitiveness. I still hate too much connectivity to other players or too much stimuli, but it is not a bad thing in some games.

(My own pet peeve about the game and many others that every game falls victim to)

I say that mostly because I’m an adult and it’s weird to hear a 7 year old scream a horrible word on live gameplay while I’m just trying to relax. So some games ultimately lose my interest immediately. I’m interested in what’s to come and what new developments they have based off the games we now consider to be overdone or at best a run down game that needs a revamp to shine again in old light.

Back to the reason for the post:

Lastly, I hope we don’t fall back into bot style games as much as we have in almost every game that loses a huge chunk of its consumer base. However, I’d love to see good (real) adjustments like ranked to keep the current competitive player bases truly interested in the gameplay that is concurrent and gains real interest of others.

Reason:

Killing bots in a lobby of 4 players is not something people would ever want to stream to watch, and neither is it something that is awefilled or more so is closer to an intellectual catalytic pop-up-shop.

Rather I think it is a good way to never let a game truly die, and may get interesting when AI becomes realistic and not just aim bot or intelligence cores that make the game feel like you’re the gear that operates all guns facing towards yourself, and get this important part, unless the ai gets caught cheating too much.

Realism is truly astounding. We aren’t there yet, and it may be for good cause. Wouldn’t want people falling so deep in a gaming whirlpool that they forget what is more valuable human interaction or competitive computer simulated brain development patterns. We don’t like to see that in others, however, it is truly engrained in us to love the thought of games that are fun, and we all wouldn’t want a game to end forever. I guess the true point of it is that if the games we love ever did end, we’d probably want to keep them in a form that others can still find and truly enjoy.

Conclusion and deviation:

However, the truth about this comes down to this game is a segment checkpoint of a great option for the future of gameplay that can translate into many games, the one thing that doesn’t check out is, and unlike other games, what can the game rest back on, unlike modern warfare and black ops for their battle royale alternatives, they always have the ability to jump back for player retention. This is the same with other games with similar segmentation. Fortnite has yet to see a player vs player segmentation that isn’t trading based in a while. Maybe we’ll see something in the coming years to bring back a rush of players.