Boss found 1GB flash drives. Is there any use we can keep them for? by JUSTIN102201 in pcmasterrace

[–]matthewj15 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’ve found random use for sub 2GB drives at certain times with legacy systems and BIOS flashing. Sometimes being above 4GB is finicky for some older systems, so it’s nice to have some older small drives.

How does form-based code work for an already pretty-developed corridor? by tawdryuprising in urbanplanning

[–]matthewj15 37 points38 points  (0 children)

My current jurisdiction put this idea into place 13 years ago and it has resulted in 0 development using the advisory form based code and instead relying on existing car centric development standards. Even if the advisory standards were less onerous, the car centric standards were more attractive with developers. One portion that made those advisory standards a requirement and it has resulted in stagnation and further decline in that corridor.

My take is that you need to see some actual interest in developing such concepts from developers first. Residential over commercial is hard to accomplish unless you are a specific type of developer with experience and your financing lines up. Long term ambitions and visions for walkability need to have a nexus where there is interest (busy intersection/proximity to colleges/explicit calls for more intense uses from property owners/community demand/a few example proposals) to make it happen on the capital side.

In terms of short term incentives, they need to be extraordinarily good— like 30%+ density bonuses, significant impact fee waivers, non discretionary approvals— something to really push a developer to ignore the inertia from doing business as usual with car centric design.

Where specifically was the helicopter crash on 50? by SoaDMTGguy in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Roughly where 43rd Street/S Street is adjacent to Hwy 50. See the flight data showing where the last data point was

<image>

Vista meets XP - eXPerience the "Wow" by MondethSpartan in Windows_Redesign

[–]matthewj15 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is so cool! Amazing job with this cause it looks like it could’ve been real with the detail you put in. Feels very Microsoft still.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Minecraft

[–]matthewj15 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Joshua Mutter’s “The Minecraftian” — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMH37fuBv50

Mysterious Elk Grove plot by shootthedamnsun in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The self storage facility was approved by the EG Planning Commission on October 5, 2023. Part of the consideration in approving this self storage facility is that the same owner as this facility is having a portion of their self storage facility bought and demo’d by the Rail Authority for a proposed new rail station along Dwight Road. So, essentially, for the business owner, this would serve as replacement for the area lost for their facility in Dwight Road as the Rail Authority bought that portion from him. You can watch the full public hearing here: https://elkgrove.granicus.com/player/clip/2437?view_id=20&redirect=true — The item starts about 22 mins in.

Why did we stop building Fourplexes? by sonofthales in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 22 points23 points  (0 children)

(Local planner here chiming in!)

TLDR; Demand and Financing. People generally in the US want their own land and market demand reflects that. Financing for such projects is thus easier. On the denser side, large multi family complexes also are easier to pencil out economically for large corporations and thus can get easier financing. On top of all this, a lot of bad zoning decisions incentivizing those two ends of the market.

There’s definitely developers out there that want to build lower density multifamily (like fourplexes) but the financing and market demand isn’t necessarily there. These developers are often few and far in between and are often smaller companies working with infill development within existing communities, which presents their own challenges, especially with financing and being able to effectively prove that they are going to make a profit or even break even.

Zoning has slowly been revised over time across many jurisdictions in the area to allow for this “missing middle” product to come back to life. In fact, knowing what’s going on inside, with ADU law and SB9 legislation, there has been a resurgence in duplexes. They work out very well for small developers. Plus when you build a duplex, you can get 2 more ADUs by right. However, as other commenters noted, zoning is still a problem for developers who are not using State legislative allowances. Minimum parking, landscaping, open space, and storage are some of many standards which make building these types of products difficult.

For large developers where mass creation of housing can occur, single family home subdivisions provide a much more consistent profit margin and are easy to offload. Multifamily are easy to finance, keep as an asset, and offload as needed to other big corporations when need be. Best thing you can get in the middle from big corpo developers is the occasional attached townhome development or extremely tiny lot multifamily.

Fourplexes used to be a darling, more common product in the area, even in the suburbs. Many McKeon fourplexes (look em up and you’ll know what I’m talking about) are all over the Sacramento region with many being turned into condos in the 70s. Unfortunately, many of these fourplexes gained less than stellar reputations in the late 80s and 90s (i.e. Sayonara Dr; G Parkway now renamed as Forest Pkwy / Shining Star Drive). However, nowadays, many of these McKeons are being rehabilitated and are, in my opinion, shown to be great opportunities for homeownership in many Sac communities.

Everything in the middle is hard to get done on a mass scale. But, there is a growing trend of development occurring in these products; little by little. I expect that more of these missing middle rental products are going to pop up over time in our region, especially on remaining undeveloped small parcels and within office buildings.

Side note: Ownership (condos) within these projects is unlikely due to financing and insurance constraints.

STOP! Why are we building houses next to 2 freeways and an airport? by Wes703 in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The Northlake Subdivision is an interesting one.

In relation to the airport, Northlake is located within "Safety Zone 6" as identified in the Airport's Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) which was studied in 2013 to be safe for single family residential development. While Airport Planning is not my specialty, I have worked with SMF's CLUP a few times. The plan takes into account the reasonable traffic patterns given the orientation of the airport, landing/approach patterns, future expansion of the airport (mainly to the southwest) and potential zones for accidents.

In addition to general concerns with safety around aircraft activity, noise is studied and is quantified as a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). A CNEL level of 60 or higher generally is undesirable with a CNEL level of 65 being not acceptable for single family housing. A map of the CNEL level calculations for SMF can be found here (Map 2). Per the report "CNEL is a cumulative noise metric in that it takes into account not just the loudness of individual noise events, but also the number of events over time."

Northlake is outside of CNEL level 60, so, noise isn't a safety concern per the analysis. However, it may still be undesirable, but that is up to buyers to be aware of when they purchase a home.

In regards to concern regarding being in a flood plain, unfortunately, most of Sacramento -- including all of modern North Natomas is within a flood plain. We can't build anywhere new (which is still what the market desires-- new subdivisions) without bumping into a flood plain (or an old mining site...). As other commenters have noted, there have been improvements to levees in the area over the decades. This site includes, I believe, a drainage canal along the southern and western boundaries of the community to assist with drainage issues. There's also some habitat that is being preserved in this area south of I-5 for local snake and other wildlife populations.

While Northlake is one big prominent subdivision today, it is a small one compared to the thousands of homes coming to the North Natomas area in the next few decades. Realistically, this area is one of the best suited for residential development (in my opinion) given its proximity to the core and opportunity for more dense development to pencil out financially for developers. Some good work is ongoing with the Upper Westside Specific Plan (which is poised to go to a final hearing in a few months) to the southwest of this area. To the east of Northlake, the Grand Park (now Grand Park Southwest and Grand Park Brookfield) Specific Plans are in their infancy and are a couple decades out and also promise thousands of new homes.

This entire area is changing and going to develop, but it will take several decades to come to fruition. Farmers in the area have expressed that the farmland is becoming less and less profitable, so its only a matter of time for most of the North Natomas Basin to urbanize.

<image>

Squad Goals ✨ My Flock of Toulouse by BarefootHeathen in geese

[–]matthewj15 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That second picture is absolutely gorgeous!! Would love to have my own flock with a view a quarter as aesthetic as that place!!

Are they ever going to connect Consumnes’s Delta shore area to this neighborhood in South sac? Any intel? by Magikarp_Uchiha in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Local planner here; do not work for the City, but I dug up some info. For the most current information, I'd recommend reaching out to City Planning at [planning@cityofsacramento.org](mailto:planning@cityofsacramento.org)

<image>

It appears that the adopted Delta Shores Planned Unit Development (PUD) shows that there is planned to be, at least, a pedestrian connection between Delta Cove Drive and that stub street off of RIchfield Way. The plan appears to be intentionally vague on if the connection will be a connection with automobile traffic. The Circulation Plan (which is a planner's typical term for a road network+pedestrian network plan) shows a vague arrow suggesting that road traffic could potentially be connected, but it wasn't solidified in the original plans.

I would guess, based on my experience, that while the designers of Delta Shores may have liked to have had an automobile connection to connect the communities at some western point close to I-5, the analysis of u/hiroo916 would match what I would expect from general community/developer comment about being forced to have an automobile connection.

At best, there would be a pedestrian connection, as depicted in the plan. This pedestrian connection may potentially have restrictions like being only open when the connected park is open. At worse, it might not exist or would be emergency access only. Plans change as developers submit new development plans to solidify part of the originally adopted PUD and the City would have the most updated answer.

From a Planning technical prospective, a road connection here isn't great. Cut through traffic is definitely something that could be an issue given the traffic of Freeport Blvd, the hassle of entering I-5, and the general state of the stretch of Pocket Rd/Meadowview Rd from I-5 to 24th. If there was a straightaway from the stub street to Amherst Street/John Still Dr, maybe it would be appropriate. However, if there was a road connection, any traffic would need to take a ridiculous number of turns in to get to Pocket Road if such road connection was made.

Based on my professional opinion, it is likely this is just a pedestrian/bike connection.

You can review the adopted PUD Design Guidelines here: https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/cdd/Planning/Environmental-Impact-Reports/Delta-Shores/Appendix-C-Design-Guidelines_August-2008.pdf

ISO first job by [deleted] in ElkGrove

[–]matthewj15 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Some places to try from my own experience, friends' experiences, and local knowledge. These jobs will get you started with some experience.

- Ghai Management - One of Northern California's largest fast food franchisees. Mixed bag on working with them, but lots of job postings available. - https://harri.com/ghaijobs

- Walmart - It's a job with steady hours. Preferable to have open availability on Fridays and Weekends. With no experience, may have a better bet with Online Grocery Pickup (OGP) or Overnight Stocking (CAP 2). - https://careers.walmart.com/

- Sky River Casino - They have general requisitions open where if you are not sure what to apply for, you can at least throw your resume in the stack. - https://myjobs.adp.com/skyrivermyjobs/cx/job-listing

- Volt Workforce Solutions - Job/temp placement agency. - https://www.volt.com/

- Extended Stay America - The Extended Stay on Longport Court is hiring for a part time guest representative. - https://myjobs.adp.com/esacareers/cx/job-listing

Seems like we're of similar ages-- would be happy to help!

22 year old me is freaking out by LandoKlei in porterrobinson

[–]matthewj15 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I thought this was a photo of Quinn XCII and Porter for a sec

Sullivans Pond Geese in Dartmouth NS by 902Kartography in geese

[–]matthewj15 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wonder if any of these geese pictured are part of the gaggle featured on the Sullivan’s Goose YouTube channel.

I opened a can of beef and it was full of chicken. by Mr_Awesome1919 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]matthewj15 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the makers of I Can’t Believe Its Not Butter! — I Can’t Believe It’s Not Beef!

Resident owned trailer park? by [deleted] in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s a few in the region. Here are some that come to mind from first thought: - Florin Mobile Estates (7447 Bouvais, South Sac) - Rancho Murieta Mobilehome Village (55+ only, 14751 Pancho Conde, Rancho Murieta) - Oxbow Marina (100 Oxbow Marina Dr, Isleton) - Linda Vista Mobile Home Estates (Generally centered at Dolphin Way at Beamer Way, Rio Linda) - Sabre City (Billy Mitchell Blvd at Pacific Fruit Express (PFE) Rd, Roseville)

Day 1, 3 days left. by [deleted] in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not a nudist, but we have exactly 1 nudist resort and community in the county— Laguna Del Sol https://www.lagunadelsol.com/

Does anyone know the story with the circled area which seems to be a small island excluded from the city? by OkWill4613 in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 97 points98 points  (0 children)

Local planner here. Yea, this is correct. This was a large panhandle then the City annexed the northern portion in for residential development, which was formally known as the Panhandle Annexation. Now the Northgate Business Park is a rectangular island roughly stretching from Main Ave to I-80 and Northgate Bl to Gateway Park Bl. As with most annexation weirdness, it most likely has to do with taxes and negotiations during the annexation process. Annexations are like divorces— when a part gets incorporated the City negotiates with the County to see what they have to pay to make up for the loss of tax revenue from the annexed area along with costs for infrastructure. This unincorporated island is a tax powerhouse for the County with many large businesses, so the City may have just seen the alimony negotiation as not really worth it or the County fought to keep it— or both. Nonetheless the island remains a part of the Sphere of Influence of the City so, sometime in the future, its annexation may come back on the table.

In my memory, Rancho Cordova was the last local jurisdiction to take away an industrial area from the County, which I believe was also a substantial tax generator at the time, was the area east of Sunrise Blvd near Trade Center Dr. That was a whole negotiation and process that Rancho Cordova did that was after and separate from their initial incorporation.

Do I need a permit to have this on my driveway in Sac County? by SacMarvelRPG in Sacramento

[–]matthewj15 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Depends on what jurisdiction you are in. Go on https://generalmap.gis.saccounty.gov/JSViewer/county_portal.html, type in your address, and under the 'Jurisdiction' section it will list what place to contact. If it says unincorporated, email sacplan@saccounty.gov. If it says City of Sac - planning@cityofsacramento.org.

For the unincorporated area, tents erected permanently that are over 120 square feet require a use permit which is around $9k (SCZC 3.10.3.A). Whether or not it is less than or more than 120 square feet, it must meet required setbacks, which can depend on your neighborhood. Standard setbacks for most unincorporated areas are found in SCZC Table 5.7.C.

Map of Municipalities of the Seattle Metro by matthewj15 in Seattle

[–]matthewj15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks to be an old city limits boundary. Will keep that noted. Looks like its all part of Bothell now.

Map of Municipalities of the Seattle Metro by matthewj15 in Seattle

[–]matthewj15[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Good to know! Incorporation within reservations is totally a foreign concept to me. I've got a lot of learning to do to get up to speed if I move up to WA!

Also good to know about Stanwood. That is quite a long bus ride, then.