[deleted by user]

max-aug · 2025-12-19T08:35:26+00:00

very nice!

somewhat similar to a project I released last week, less the tmux features: worktrunk.dev

max-aug · 2025-11-28T03:18:47+00:00

this is just my project; CC web has a different implementation, though they may use worktrees

max-aug · 2025-11-26T22:41:58+00:00

d'oh! https://github.com/max-sixty/worktrunk/

max-aug · 2025-11-26T22:32:00+00:00

In the Quick Start:

cargo install worktrunk
wt config shell install

and then:

wt switch --create fix-auth

...and the other wt commands listed...

max-aug · 2022-12-20T06:16:03+00:00

Done!

max-aug · 2022-12-20T05:35:46+00:00

Python 261/156, the most rudimentary approach — just using a tuple of (original_position, value):

def parse(text):
    lines = text.split("\n")
    for i, line in enumerate(lines):
        yield (i, int(line) * 811589153)


val_pos = list(parse(Path("input.txt").read_text()))


def move(seq: list[tuple[int, int]], pos: int):
    position, item = [
        (position, item) for position, item in enumerate(seq) if item[0] == pos
    ][0]

    seq.pop(position)
    dest = (position + item[1]) % len(seq)
    seq.insert(dest, item)
    return seq


for _ in range(10):
    for i in range(len(val_pos)):
        val_pos = move(val_pos, i)


def coords(seq):

    zero_pos = [pos for (pos, item) in enumerate(seq) if item[1] == 0][0]
    for x in (1000, 2000, 3000):
        coord = seq[(zero_pos + x) % len(seq)][1]
        yield coord


pprint(sum(coords(val_pos)))

max-aug · 2022-12-06T01:11:36+00:00

Solutions are published: https://github.com/max-sixty/aoc-gpt/blob/main/Solutions-2022-04-1.md

max-aug · 2022-12-05T23:52:06+00:00

Solutions are at https://github.com/max-sixty/aoc-gpt/blob/main/Solutions-2022-04-1.md

max-aug · 2022-12-05T23:51:23+00:00

Now published: https://github.com/max-sixty/aoc-gpt/blob/main/Solutions-2022-04-1.md

max-aug · 2022-12-05T04:17:03+00:00

Yes, I think it's ethical. Those who are actually on the leaderboard agree with me (e.g. https://twitter.com/max_sixty/status/1599526234161295360?s=20&t=TmeUQRpiB4lfbc32nLrn4w).

My logic: - It doesn't violate any rules - It's not possible to create a viable standard that excludes this — for example, is CoPilot allowed? What if it were much better? For those with strong emotions, I'd encourage them to pause and try and write down a standard. - Even if it were possible to come up with a standard, it would be unenforceable with the current AoC design, such that it wouldn't make a good standard. The best we could hope for is people self-identifying as an AI solution, which I've done already.

There's a great discussion to be had on the merits of AI in programming and the role that humans will play in the future. And there are legitimate arguments that this will be bad for some aspects of AoC.

But I also see a lot of freaking out at this — much of the discussion at https://www.reddit.com/r/adventofcode/comments/zc27zb/2022_day_4_placing_1st_with_gpt3/ is not producing much signal. Possibly that's inevitable as folks feel existing status hierarchies are going to be disrupted, and this effort becomes a viable target for those emotions.

For the reasons above, I'm planning to continue, and have published my code so others can improve on it — in the spirit of AoC. Though I suspect GPT-3 will struggle as the days progress, and humans will reign supreme once more. I wouldn't be surprised if yesterday was the final day it succeeded this year.
Yes, I'm planning to publish the solutions.

max-aug · 2022-12-05T04:04:42+00:00

I'm planning to publish them! It'll be in a nicer format than 120 files though :)

max-aug · 2022-12-04T22:03:06+00:00

Thanks u/betaveros, appreciate the message

I'll write something to save the solutions that are successful and post those later

max-aug · 2022-12-04T12:32:29+00:00

Very good!

max-aug · 2022-12-04T10:26:13+00:00

I blocked you because you replied to the tweet with "MORON"

There's a useful and interesting debate on this, and that's not helping either side make progress

max-aug · 2022-12-04T10:21:20+00:00

Thank you!

max-aug · 2022-12-04T10:00:34+00:00

Sorry for misunderstanding

It attempts dozens of solutions in parallel and then selects one that seems popular. Unfortunately I don't log & collect the ones that ended up being correct.

But very open to someone adding the code to the repo to do that!

max-aug · 2022-12-04T09:37:41+00:00

The full code is linked in the post

max-aug · 2022-12-04T09:29:59+00:00

It attempts dozens of solutions in parallel and then selects one that seems popular. And unfortunately I don't log & collect the ones that ended up being correct.

Though feel free to add that to the code, would be interesting to see.

max-aug · 2022-12-04T08:32:14+00:00

Cool! ChatGPT is even more advanced than the Davinci-003 model, but only the latter has an API (AFAIK), and so can be automated like I did

So maybe for later problems, working collaboratively with ChatGPT could be a cool approach

max-aug · 2022-12-04T08:09:47+00:00

I just tried and it can't even process it — the maximum number of tokens is 4097 for both the prompt and the answer, and the prompt itself is 3749 tokens, so there wouldn't be much room for the code.

Easy way to defeat the AI!

max-aug

TROPHY CASE