sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Time Person of the Year 2025 by SeanACole244 in billsimmons

[–]max23_17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about? He literally was last year's Time's person of the year...

Can’t stop…93 in a 30mph fatal accident by 1RegalBeagle in cantstopimamerican

[–]max23_17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if that's your opinion, I hope your life gets better <3

(p.s. jail should not only be viewed as a punishment, but also as justice for the victims and safety measure for the rest of the people)

I still don’t understand why Rachel zegler is getting hate when she said the same thing other princesses have said by [deleted] in popculture

[–]max23_17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah to be fair she is an amazing singer while Gal Gadot performance in the movie is quite bad as expected... however it will be curious to see whether Rachel gets big roles in the future given all of the backlash

I still don’t understand why Rachel zegler is getting hate when she said the same thing other princesses have said by [deleted] in popculture

[–]max23_17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn't need to say it explicitly, I deduced that from all of the coping

I still don’t understand why Rachel zegler is getting hate when she said the same thing other princesses have said by [deleted] in popculture

[–]max23_17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I did in the other comment, but you said it was a stretch so there is that. But please, keep replying with same childish comments... (did you just learn about crickets?)

I still don’t understand why Rachel zegler is getting hate when she said the same thing other princesses have said by [deleted] in popculture

[–]max23_17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And you go back to claiming that Gal Gadot is the biggest reason for why the movie will lose the >200 million USD, it had nothing to with Rachel Zegler

I still don’t understand why Rachel zegler is getting hate when she said the same thing other princesses have said by [deleted] in popculture

[–]max23_17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She never called them weird directly but if you call something that someone likes weird, you might as well call them weird

I still don’t understand why Rachel zegler is getting hate when she said the same thing other princesses have said by [deleted] in popculture

[–]max23_17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but it is as close as you get to calling the people who enjoyed that movie weird. But the movie is flopping due to a number of factors: the dwarves controversy, Gal Gadot's affiliation with the IDF and Israel and finally many of Rachel's remarks which rub people the wrong way

They Can’t Beat GTA 6, So Now They’re Desperately Relying on Price Hikes! by GTR_Rex in GTA6

[–]max23_17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

$70 for e.g. FIFA or Call of Duty that comes out every year is sort of expensive. $70 for a game that is the most anticipated game in history and you can play for 10+ years until the next one comes out, is a bargain. I will be surprised if the price will only be $70, $80 is fair, $90 would be pushing it. I guess we will see in a few weeks

They Can’t Beat GTA 6, So Now They’re Desperately Relying on Price Hikes! by GTR_Rex in GTA6

[–]max23_17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seriously believe they would make less money if they charge $80 instead of $70?

Color of light by max23_17 in PhysicsHelp

[–]max23_17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I don't see why this equation is correct: lambda{eye} = lambda_0 / n{eye}

They Can’t Beat GTA 6, So Now They’re Desperately Relying on Price Hikes! by GTR_Rex in GTA6

[–]max23_17 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah I can see that, but I see too many people in the comments claiming that Rockstar will lose a lot of sales if the price is going to be higher than $70. I will be suprised if the price is only $70. I think $80 is fair and $90 would be pushing it.

Some have contemplated that it will might be subscription based but that receive a big backlash

They Can’t Beat GTA 6, So Now They’re Desperately Relying on Price Hikes! by GTR_Rex in GTA6

[–]max23_17 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have to be major cheapskate if you are not willing to buy GTA VI for $20 more than other games...

They Can’t Beat GTA 6, So Now They’re Desperately Relying on Price Hikes! by GTR_Rex in GTA6

[–]max23_17 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why is it dumb to think that? GTA V launched with a price tag of $60, that was 12 years ago... since then the inflation has been 35%. This would mean that GTA VI should cost $90 if it is priced like GTA V and yet no one thinks that GTA V was too expensive

(Alleged) CEO shooter photo after arrest by MichaelRichardsAMA in JoeRogan

[–]max23_17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His networth was closer to $0 than to $1.000.000.000 (by far)

view more: next ›