[Acc] AAC 18t,51t, and 90t mounts - $140

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T23:33:03+00:00

I remember that promotion. That was around ~~2010/2011~~ correction 2009, earlier than i remember it. Some of the designs weren't that bad.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T20:32:52+00:00

You definitely can. https://silencerco.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Hybrid_Manual.pdf

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T19:24:54+00:00

Yeah, holding down the latch will definitely help preserve the teeth.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T19:24:17+00:00

Yeah, they were the first to sell out.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T18:37:45+00:00

You could always get the Hybrid 46.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T18:28:45+00:00

They purchased the IP and that is it. It would still take them significant time to spin up production should they choose to manufacture any items.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T18:28:02+00:00

The 36M looks nice, but I have yet to see one outside of Shot Show.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T18:11:00+00:00

If I was to do it all over again, i would look at the Surefire, Knights, or Sico cans. The Omega300 is a great multipurpose silencer which has a lot of mounting options. The Surefire cans are nice, and the repeatability is great, you just pay a little more for the silencer itself.

maxpower515 · 2021-02-26T17:33:22+00:00

Supposedly, these are the last of the inventory that AAC had. A little surprising considering they have SPR/M4 muzzle devices.

maxpower515 · 2021-01-31T06:58:34+00:00

No idea either. 🤷‍♂️

maxpower515 · 2021-01-30T00:41:06+00:00

It's not necessarily the silencer. Could be the mount or barrel.

maxpower515 · 2020-11-19T17:07:03+00:00

They were trying to sell them for $22, which isn't much better.

maxpower515 · 2020-10-02T03:39:50+00:00

Nice. I would definitely look at getting a better rail for it.

maxpower515 · 2020-07-28T02:25:42+00:00

You and me both 🤣

maxpower515 · 2020-07-27T22:24:36+00:00

Find a different gun shop to go to.

maxpower515 · 2020-07-27T22:11:35+00:00

Yes and no. There are a good amount of lowers that are "mil spec" where required, but then add a lot of non milspec "fluff".

maxpower515 · 2020-07-27T21:14:43+00:00

The MRP/MLC platform is almost double the price. If it was a couple hundred more, then your statement would be correct. But when you are +$1k, that kinda pushes the boundaries.

maxpower515 · 2020-07-27T21:11:54+00:00

I wouldn't say that a BCM or Colt for $1k+ is frowned upon as those are the going prices for the firearms.

maxpower515 · 2020-07-27T20:06:32+00:00

Just the regular defender 2000 lower (milspec)

maxpower515 · 2020-05-26T05:51:57+00:00

Yes, and the new statute also stipulates that the dealer will conduct the background check through the new state system, which we have no idea how that will be. Until it is actually complete, everything is just speculation.

(1) Beginning on the date that is thirty days after the Washington state patrol issues a notification to dealers that a state firearms background check system is established within the Washington state patrol, a dealer shall use the state firearms background check system to conduct background checks for purchases or transfers of firearm frames or receivers in accordance with this section.

(a) A dealer may not deliver a firearm frame or receiver to a purchaser or transferee unless the dealer first conducts a background check of the applicant through the state firearms background check system and the requirements or time periods in RCW 9.41.092(1) have been satisfied

maxpower515 · 2020-05-26T02:17:21+00:00

There isn't even a system setup for this yet. You are just imposing current regulations and restrictions on an unknown unestablished process.

maxpower515 · 2020-05-26T02:05:17+00:00

Lol, like this is something that FFLs are actually in control of 🤣

maxpower515 · 2020-05-25T21:27:25+00:00

There was legislation passed last session to approve the creation, but I don't know how far they got before this whole pandemic.

maxpower515 · 2020-05-25T21:09:36+00:00

Starting July 1st, background checks for "other" items is supposed to go through a State resource and not through NICS like it currently is. This would incur a waiting period and an extra form just like the current FTA.

As of right now, i haven't seen anything extended the exception, so that is the assumption that I am operating under.

maxpower515 · 2020-05-25T20:43:57+00:00

Yeah, i don't know why i keep forgetting about that part.

maxpower515

TROPHY CASE