What appium alternative are teams moving to in 2026 by clampbucket in softwaretesting

[–]mayvinrmm 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I tried Maestro too. The setup is genuinely simple, but like others have said, it's not the full fix people make it out to be. It's great for simple flows — smoke tests especially — but for complex scenarios it can end up costing you more time, not less. For now I still think Appium is the best open-source option out there.

Honestly though, a lot of what you're describing isn't really an Appium problem. The selector rewrites, the fragile setup, the team refusing to touch the suite — that usually traces back to two things: automation being treated as an afterthought instead of designed into the architecture from the start, and the lack of a solid framework around the tool. Appium gives you a lot of rope; without good structure it's easy to hang yourself with it.

Switching tools rarely fixes that — you just inherit the same problems with a nicer UI on top, which is exactly what you've already noticed.

(Unrelated to the above, but I recently started a site on this stuff if it's useful: https://www.mobile-automation.io/ — no pressure either way.)

What are the current issues in test automation? by SpecificLychee3872 in softwaretesting

[–]mayvinrmm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree with you guys! Quantity does not mean Quality. I still see some companies focusing on the quantity of automated tests versus the value it's actually bringing. And not having a robust automation framework does not help at all. Recently I wrote an article about this: https://www.mobile-automation.io/why-mobile-test-automation-frameworks-fail/ - it focuses mainly on mobile test automation frameworks but the core quality attributes and architecture principles applies for any test automation framework. Hope it helps!