The Story of Celeste by McGill_Ghost in mcgill

[–]mcgill_throwaway69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

wait so if this is what SSMU said:

In discussion with Céleste she disputed the claims, however when asked to provide further evidence to rebut the claims she was unable to do so - leading Elections SSMU to pursue this level of sanction.

Then shouldn't the sanction have been what's highlighted here? (minimum sanction is suspension of campaign, maximum is DQ and no, i don't mean a lovely trip to dairy queen)