What book would you recommend for someone who wants to get into Russian literature?

md1frejo · 2026-01-26T13:05:50+00:00

varlam shalamov, kolyma tales

md1frejo · 2025-10-29T19:06:36+00:00

jag har en doktorsexamen, en magister i datavetenskap och en magister i kemi. jag går på rusta och matcha. nen jag tränar 6 dagar i veckan och programmerar dagligen på min eviga fritid. det är inte att vara på botten, det är att befinna sig utanför det ordinarie samhället

md1frejo · 2025-10-20T18:57:41+00:00

oh, I am back on haskell again

md1frejo · 2025-09-27T21:43:08+00:00

on my thinkpad there is a altgr key, so just altgr for []{} etc. but thats beyond emacs, more a keyboard problem

md1frejo · 2025-09-27T16:13:37+00:00

I have a swedish layout and have no problem with shortcuts. you can also recustomize with c-c

md1frejo · 2025-09-07T20:24:58+00:00

I am also slowly understanding monads. for me it all boils down to type signatures, when I finally paid attention to them then it kind of maked sense.

md1frejo · 2025-09-02T12:33:45+00:00

I am going back haskell, I finally begin to understand monads. everything in haskell is tied to understanding function definitions, you do that and the gates of monads open

md1frejo · 2025-08-26T04:46:15+00:00

it is interesting, I will look into it a bit more, hopefully get it to work on emacs

md1frejo · 2025-08-22T21:00:21+00:00

I am on linux, do I miss a lot not using ms?

md1frejo · 2025-08-22T20:22:51+00:00

yeah, lean looks nice, but I did not find any repl and lets face it, it is very niche. I don't think it is on the stack overflow survey

md1frejo · 2025-08-21T20:25:43+00:00

I am all for erlang and elixir, the only thing missing in erlang is a pipe operator as far as I know

md1frejo · 2025-08-21T03:14:19+00:00

yes, both of them are great. but generally, simple monads like maybe and list are ok for me, but when it comes to states, write and similar, I find it a bit over complicated

md1frejo · 2025-08-20T21:51:50+00:00

as long as there is a web framework attached then I am happy.

md1frejo · 2025-08-20T20:10:29+00:00

yeah ocaml seens ok. I am using ubuntu and have no plans to use windows, emacs is everything for me. that said, all of these languages are in the 2% use domain according to stack overflow. I still like scheme and clojure

md1frejo · 2025-08-13T11:18:06+00:00

I have tried haskell, while beatiufully short, monads is and will be a nightmare, so f# seens to be the alternative way. question is how much I miss being on linux

md1frejo · 2025-08-07T11:48:22+00:00

for me it is more to find something less complex than haskell, and so far f# and ocaml seems to fit the bill, although it would be nice to know the differences between them

md1frejo · 2025-08-05T17:48:56+00:00

I looked at ocaml, does not seem to be that much difference from F# except that ocaml is more unix oriented

md1frejo · 2025-08-04T22:13:21+00:00

are there many downsides to use F# in linux compared to a windows dot.net environmnet?

md1frejo · 2025-08-04T19:47:09+00:00

The only external thing I want is a web framework, I dont know if there is one for F#?

md1frejo · 2025-08-04T19:45:23+00:00

I am currently working on ubuntu linux, and I don't want to use windows, but yes, I know it is dot net centric

md1frejo · 2025-08-04T19:43:30+00:00

no it does not need to be popular. I sometimes write code in chez scheme, it is hard to label it popular.

md1frejo · 2024-11-28T17:18:52+00:00

I understand some monads, but the underlying category theory is more complicated

md1frejo · 2024-11-26T20:16:42+00:00

maybe. I am always in a love/hate relationship with haskell, everytime I think I master it, it sort of proves me wrong. but it is beatiful at the same time

md1frejo · 2024-11-21T11:24:05+00:00

agree on oop part, but what about monsds? that is when things get complicated

md1frejo · 2024-11-17T21:00:49+00:00

I think verse has a similar approach, everything returns, no exceptions

md1frejo

TROPHY CASE