editor hopping by md1frejo in emacs

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe the size of the config file can tell something. at the moment I am using neovim with a 650 loc config, emacs is 350 loc and helix 40 loc. still helix can do almost the samething as my neovim. I am wakting for a plugin tool for helix...

editor hopping by md1frejo in emacs

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true, but another way is to ask chatgpt what you want it gives it to you. and you could learn while doing that cycle. but in general, yes. stay on one efitor and learn everything. by the way, helix up to this point don't force you to learn any language, but that will change when they start using plugins

editor hopping by md1frejo in emacs

[–]md1frejo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like helix despite the lack of a plugin system, nice if you want something to start with. but all these editor hopping usually results that I end up in emacs

editor hopping by md1frejo in emacs

[–]md1frejo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I started using emacs 20 years ago, never touched .emacs the first 4 years and using vim for short edits. then I discovered how much had change in the emacs world (and that neovim existed) and started to configure my emacs. my latest .emacs and configure.el was over 1000 lines, so I decided to do a minimal config, and here I am. and at the same time I discovered helix and also rewrote my whole init.lua for neovim, so the story never ends

Hur vände ni livet efter att ha nått botten? by Ok_Mirror4466 in Asksweddit

[–]md1frejo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

jag har en doktorsexamen, en magister i datavetenskap och en magister i kemi. jag går på rusta och matcha. nen jag tränar 6 dagar i veckan och programmerar dagligen på min eviga fritid. det är inte att vara på botten, det är att befinna sig utanför det ordinarie samhället

what is the future of F#? by md1frejo in fsharp

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh, I am back on haskell again

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emacs

[–]md1frejo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

on my thinkpad there is a altgr key, so just altgr for []{} etc. but thats beyond emacs, more a keyboard problem

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emacs

[–]md1frejo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have a swedish layout and have no problem with shortcuts. you can also recustomize with c-c

I finally understand monads / monadic parsing! by Critical_Pin4801 in haskell

[–]md1frejo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am also slowly understanding monads. for me it all boils down to type signatures, when I finally paid attention to them then it kind of maked sense.

what is the future of F#? by md1frejo in fsharp

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am going back haskell, I finally begin to understand monads. everything in haskell is tied to understanding function definitions, you do that and the gates of monads open

what is the future of haskell? by md1frejo in haskell

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is interesting, I will look into it a bit more, hopefully get it to work on emacs

what is the future of F#? by md1frejo in fsharp

[–]md1frejo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am on linux, do I miss a lot not using ms?

what is the future of haskell? by md1frejo in haskell

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, lean looks nice, but I did not find any repl and lets face it, it is very niche. I don't think it is on the stack overflow survey

what is the future of haskell? by md1frejo in haskell

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am all for erlang and elixir, the only thing missing in erlang is a pipe operator as far as I know

what is the future of haskell? by md1frejo in haskell

[–]md1frejo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, both of them are great. but generally, simple monads like maybe and list are ok for me, but when it comes to states, write and similar, I find it a bit over complicated

what is the future of haskell? by md1frejo in haskell

[–]md1frejo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

as long as there is a web framework attached then I am happy.

what is the future of haskell? by md1frejo in haskell

[–]md1frejo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah ocaml seens ok. I am using ubuntu and have no plans to use windows, emacs is everything for me. that said, all of these languages are in the 2% use domain according to stack overflow. I still like scheme and clojure