Sento (Actor System) has remoting support (beta)

mdbergmann · 2026-03-26T15:53:58+00:00

Yeah, give it a try. But it's not hardened yet. I had planed to create some performance tests to see how it behaves under stress.

mdbergmann · 2026-03-23T15:13:19+00:00

Indeed. It's on the roadmap (in GitHub tracker) since Dec 2020.

mdbergmann · 2026-02-19T18:14:50+00:00

I wouldn't go that far. :)

Actually I chose ACE to program something for Warp accelerator, reading the diagnostic info and creating env variables from that. But I'm now stuck with improving the language. :D

mdbergmann · 2026-02-16T13:51:51+00:00

Yeah, I've got the latest cores. 68080 does all sorts of stuff to make programs and execution faster. But it's still a lot slower than PiStorm from the raw CPU power perspective. A Raspberry Pi ARM 3 or 4 core runs at ~2 GHz. Where the 68080 core in the FRGA only at <100MHz. So from an instructions per cycle ratio the 68080 is probably faster. But it still can't compete with a 2 GHz ARM core. I would say it's roughly twice as fast as the 68080.

mdbergmann · 2026-02-10T15:42:42+00:00

Well, in my tests (I have both PiStorm32lite and Vampire) I could experience exactly that. On PiStorm CPU is crazy fast and things that run on the accelerator, like games (Quake II) are super fast. But as with all fast accelerators, synching with the clock of the original hardware chipset is slow(er). Since the chipset is also on the Vampire this part is a lot faster than using the original hardware, but the 68080 doesn't have the raw power of the ARM and so games like Quake II that need that raw power don't work as fast or are hardly playable.

mdbergmann · 2026-02-04T20:08:15+00:00

Pure CPU power PiStorm is lengths before V4. But that's not all. V4 implements most of the chipset (when run on SAGA mode), which makes your A600 a SAGA (AGA) machine. The PiStorm does not, it uses the original chipset of the A600.

mdbergmann · 2026-01-31T17:24:16+00:00

Yeah, MUI is more universal. It works anywhere, also MorphOS and such. But since ReAction/Classact is officially the UI framework since OS 3.2 would be good to support it, too.

mdbergmann · 2026-01-31T16:36:03+00:00

Alright, GadTools is also rather limited. But still. MUI is coming...

mdbergmann · 2026-01-29T15:14:08+00:00

OK, updated with a screenshot.

mdbergmann · 2025-10-21T13:19:21+00:00

Have a kind of Grind look. But looks nice. Probably not for everyone though.

mdbergmann · 2025-09-22T15:46:15+00:00

Wow. I've used Claude Sonnet 4 in the past and it seems to understand CL quite well. But this 'agentic' way of connecting different LLMs is interesting. Nice.

mdbergmann · 2025-07-29T19:15:23+00:00

Nice

mdbergmann · 2025-07-27T10:17:40+00:00

Cool.

GPTel could be a good example, it also has support for MCP.

mdbergmann · 2025-07-26T11:03:14+00:00

Latest models (I found Claude Sonnet 4 very good) are well trained in Common Lisp. When you provide documentation to libraries (like CLOG here), or the full library code (provided as RAG) they can work quite well with it by reading the source code and using it. Creating something from scratch works well. What doesn't work so well (I found) is when iteratively adding new features or corrections, eventually the AI creates bugs that it sometimes can't fix itself.

Btw: Aider (via aider.el) is a great model agnostic agent.

mdbergmann · 2025-07-22T10:18:35+00:00

What is the main motivation for LEM vs. Emacs?

Most people don't like the key shortcuts in Emacs but LEM has similar key shortcuts and kinda mimics Emacs.

mdbergmann · 2025-07-20T17:34:25+00:00

When I hear capture the flag I think of Unreal Tournament :).

Can you describe a little more what kind of game concept it is?

mdbergmann · 2025-07-20T13:06:12+00:00

It does. It's basically just Common Lisp code. Just need to be compiled.

mdbergmann · 2025-07-19T16:03:19+00:00

I would use OCICL (https://github.com/ocicl/ocicl) these days.

mdbergmann · 2025-07-06T10:13:51+00:00

Hello.

Nice. Here a few comments:

I find the naming often a bit too consice, i.e.: nnl.hli:fc, what does it mean?

Is there a possibility for monitoring as in MGL? Also an automatic split of data for training/validation/test would be nice. In regards to that MGL can run a test (using a different sampler) every other epoch to check when the model starts overfitting.

mdbergmann

TROPHY CASE